Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA.  I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPCM to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and it is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week.
    • It probably deletes after a certain time. What a shame you did not check at the time. However I have no doubt that there was a PCN envelope under your windscreen wiper  as shown quite clearly on one of the photographs. . It would seem strange that it was placed there empty hence the reason I stated a second Notice was issued [though not necessarily sent. As I said in that letter to IPC that was not what the complaint was about and probably  IPC will ask about that at the same time if they accept you  going direct to IPC for the other matter. It is immaterial how many original PCNs were issued or not issued. You are able to show the two that you have from their sar one of which coincides with the one you received in the post and that is the one that does not agree with the date times of PoFA. Thus breaching not only the Act, but also the IPC  Code of Conduct and the ability of UKPCM to obtain data from the DVLA. So leave that part of the letter as good to go. However as it is as Dave [Thank you Dave!} pointed out that it is UKPCM and not UKPCI have amended the letter and posted it below.
    • Just under half of young savers put away at least 20% of their monthly income, compared to just 12% of 45- to 54-year-olds.View the full article
    • Its based on 10% annual depreciation, divided by 52 weeks and then x the excess number of weeks that they have had the vehicle for, after the agreed initial 3 week repair.
    • LOL LOL LOL Don't need that many to deport a handful of volunteers - at best Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show Cant have hundreds of well paid people in a department deporting a single volunteer when we have an upcoming election to lose now can we - VIPal drenched in riches and departments full of pals well paid for doing nowt will 'sadly soon be history - was rumored to in a text from a soon to be ex-minister texting in from one of his main jobs in a number of industries he will soon be unable to help.   Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Medical Reports for an application/appeal - no longer free!!


ANDYANDFLO
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5087 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Another bit of bad news. GP's & Consultants have decided in my area that they will no longer offer medical reports to be used in ESA applications and appeals free of charge.

 

The decision has been made citing lack of free time and cost. GP's cite too many free reports for patients is causing time loss which is directly leading to quality of care for other patients.

 

They are working to the rules set down by the DWP:

 

A patient has asked for a report to support his appeal after having his Incapacity Benefit withdrawn. Do their GP have to provide a report?

 

No. GPs, as certifying medical practitioners, have a statutory obligation to provide statements of incapacity to patients on their list and certain information to a healthcare professional working for Atos Healthcare on behalf of DWP when requested. However, under their NHS contract there is no requirement for GPs to provide reports or offer an opinion on incapacity for work to anyone else unless requested to do so by Jobcentre Plus.

Claimants should contact Jobcentre Plus or the Appeals Service, where appropriate, if they think that further medical evidence is necessary to support their claim or appeal. They should state clearly their reasons for believing that further evidence is necessary.

If Jobcentre Plus or the Appeals Service consider that further medical evidence is necessary, they will seek it. They will be responsible for paying any fee to the doctor providing the report.

So NHS GPs are under no obligation to provide such evidence to their patients nor to provide it free of charge. If a GP does not agree to provide additional evidence for their patient then it is a private matter to be resolved between the GP and their patient.

 

I am left with two choices, pay for the reports privately or apply to DWP/Tribunal Services for them to obtain them if THEY think they would help me get ESA. They would of course be responsible for the costs.

 

Anybody with any useful ideas where I go to from here? I obviously cannot afford the fees they are charging. And how do I persuade the DWP/Tribunal Services to agree to them if it means over turning their own decisions.

 

I hope this does not become a national situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ANDYANDFLO,

mmm. I'm going to go on semantics here.

You say you have to pay for medical reports. I think thats standard. That said I've never asked my GP for a medical report. In my interpretation thats a physical examination followed up by a written report of some depth.

I've always asked my GP if she would be kind enough to write a letter of support. Three or four so far I think. Never been a problem.

She is succinct I'll give her that. The letters may only be a couple of paragraphs in length but she pulls no punches.

Whilst - bizarrely - I failed at my tribunal the 'medical expert' made special mention of her supporting letter.

Not sure if that adds anything to your dilemma! :)

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ANDYANDFLO,

mmm. I'm going to go on semantics here.

You say you have to pay for medical reports. I think thats standard. That said I've never asked my GP for a medical report. In my interpretation thats a physical examination followed up by a written report of some depth.

I've always asked my GP if she would be kind enough to write a letter of support. Three or four so far I think. Never been a problem.

She is succinct I'll give her that. The letters may only be a couple of paragraphs in length but she pulls no punches.

Whilst - bizarrely - I failed at my tribunal the 'medical expert' made special mention of her supporting letter.

Not sure if that adds anything to your dilemma! :)

Best wishes

Rae

 

Hi thanks

Sorry to have confused the problem. What has happened, well here at least is two fold. The GP will not now give a letter of support/opinion of how illness affects my working life/GP history of visits etc without payment.

Secondly, the Consultants will not give a letter of support/history of illness/how it affects me/prognosis without payment.

 

Yes you are right both used to send these reports free of charge.

Both the GP and the Consultants are saying that this work is not covered by their NHS contract. As such anything other than what they are paid to do will now have to be paid privately

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry a bit more. All of this info has been obtained by the doctors and is already on their files. It's like going to your GP and talking to him/her as a matter of course during an appointment and getting advice/info about your health problem. Now if you want that confirming in writing I will have to pay for it as giving me a letter confirming what is wrong with me is not covered under the GP's contract with the NHS. Likewise the consultants.

I should have made sure that the reports sent to GP from my Consultants were copied to me as well for which I am entitled to receive at the time BUT not at a later date. Confusing yes!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeesh! That sounds like the hypocritic oath!

The only thing I can think of is patience. Until the election dust has settled down then complain loudly and clearly to your MP. It's wrong.

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's awful. In civil law, wouldn't the person or organisation be liable for costs like that if they lost? Although it doesn't help the cash flow of the people needing the letters or reports and I don't know if it will be addressed. I feel we should bombard someone - the DWP? - with emails about this, not sure if it would help, but I would feel better!

 

I can sort of see the doctors' point. They're paid by insurance companies for these letters and given how many people are being let down by the DWP, the work is falling to the doctors to do it for nothing. Which takes us neatly back to Atos and the DWP.....

 

Grrrrrrrrrr. HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not DWP rules; it is what is set down within the NHS, although DWP feature it in their website in their FAQ's. A medical practitioner working for the NHS has never been under obligation to write a report for a patient for incapacity for work at the patient's request, this is private practice and has been the case for as long as I can remember.

 

Some people have been lucky in that their medical practioners will write a report at their request without charge but they are within their rights to refuse as this.

 

You can ask for a copy of your medical records which they do have to provide if you submit an official request for them - these may or may not feature an overview of how your condition affects you though if you have therapy such as OT or physio or the like then your records are more likely to contain this information. The downside is that they can charge you for your medical records.

 

The Appeals Service exists as a justice system. They are not affiliated with DWP and if they feel that you are entitled to the benefit then yes they will revise the decision. It may lift your spirits to know that over half of incapacity and disability decisions are overturned at appeal. This is something that has caused DWP to be heavily criticised in recent years, particularly after the introduction of ESA in 2008. These criticisms led to a review of the ESA descriptors. Some of the descriptors are set to be changed, some for the better but some for the worse. I am not confident in the new descriptors as a whole but there are an improvement to some of them. A tribunal also take a very dim view where a decision has been made in ignorance of a material fact, or where the evidence has not been balanced proportionately. Every Appeal costs the DWP thousands, whether a decision is altered or not so it is not in their interests to allow a case to go to appeal where they can revise the decision in the claimant's favour before it gets to that stage, providing of course that the claimant is entitled.

 

DWP are obligated to revise a decision if there is information which is sufficient in changing the reasoning for the decision. That revision may or may not be to the claimant's benefit though.

 

I would strongly suggest a written letter to DWP and the Appeals Service expressing that you feel your own medical practitioners will be able to provide information which is contradictory to their assessment. Give reasons for this to support your case. The more information you provide, the more likely it is that a report will be requested. Have a look in the sticky's at a thread honeybee set up and use it as a template for your reasonings, inserting your own medical issues into it.

 

Best wishes

Erika

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

GPs charge for supplying copies of medical records. The charge differs from area to area. The charge is down to the claimant and cannot be recovered, even after a successful appeal. CAB advises it may be beneficial to have copy of medical records from the beginning of your claim to the present when applying for and taking part in an appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

why doesn't everyone bog the system down by using the freedom of information and apply using the data protection act for a copy of all data whether written or computer based etc that atos or the dwp have.

 

Do the requests separately and compare the information between the two organisations.

 

they can't claim client confidentiality and once you've got all the data , next time you contact them and they come out with some more crap , ask them where they got the new info from as it doesn't seem to be in the file information received from them.

 

jUST KEEP ASKING FOR UPDATED INFORMATION

 

iT IS YOUR LEGAL RIGHT.

 

The dwp is so inefficient that if they go on strike you'd not even notice.:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got my medical report today and I paid 50 pounds for the 60 pages of the report.

I expect I'd be asked to pay about the same amount for my doctors letter and a consultant's letter.

 

I wonder if there is a way to have a refund for this? From the tribunal to order ATOS to pay for this as they were the ones who have made the mistake :D:D? Yeah, lets charge ATOS they are the rich ones :D:D

 

On another note I am so angry with my doctors when I had a look at the report, there are SO MANY blood test results which were quite bad but I was never informed of them ! Some of them constant alerts for 5 years !! If my doctors have monitored this and followed the dots I might not be so ill today ! But the doctors are overworked and stressed out too and have little time to compare the results with the history.

 

I am so glad for the homeopathic hospital, they were the ones to open my eyes and show me the larger picture.

 

It seems that almost the doctors do not want to let you know how serious your condition is. When I was at my ATOS medical the nurse who examined me got angry that I was TOLD about my results, she said the blood test results should not be explained to me as it ( I quote her) "increases my anxiety"

 

Well, I have been trying to fight with my doctors for years to prove my condition is not mental but physical, now I got the proof but what is good in it when my condition is 90% worse?

 

The point I want to make is that IMO 50% of us would not be in this situation if the doctors were more alert and more interested to treat our conditions long ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got my medical report today and I paid 50 pounds for the 60 pages of the report.

I expect I'd be asked to pay about the same amount for my doctors letter and a consultant's letter.

 

I wonder if there is a way to have a refund for this? From the tribunal to order ATOS to pay for this as they were the ones who have made the mistake :D:D? Yeah, lets charge ATOS they are the rich ones :D:D

 

On another note I am so angry with my doctors when I had a look at the report, there are SO MANY blood test results which were quite bad but I was never informed of them ! Some of them constant alerts for 5 years !! If my doctors have monitored this and followed the dots I might not be so ill today ! But the doctors are overworked and stressed out too and have little time to compare the results with the history.

 

I am so glad for the homeopathic hospital, they were the ones to open my eyes and show me the larger picture.

 

It seems that almost the doctors do not want to let you know how serious your condition is. When I was at my ATOS medical the nurse who examined me got angry that I was TOLD about my results, she said the blood test results should not be explained to me as it ( I quote her) "increases my anxiety"

 

Well, I have been trying to fight with my doctors for years to prove my condition is not mental but physical, now I got the proof but what is good in it when my condition is 90% worse?

 

The point I want to make is that IMO 50% of us would not be in this situation if the doctors were more alert and more interested to treat our conditions long ago.

 

Hi, I too have now received copies of my medical files. They cost me £100 as I am treated at two different hospitals - 330 miles apart!! There is only one way that these could be obtained free of charge and that is by the Tribunal/ATOS/DWP applying for them on your behalf - something that they are obliged to do if you can convince them that evidence exists that can disprove the ATOS report & DWP decision!!! See how far you get with that one I ask??

One of my files goes back to 1994 when one of my illnesses started. I agree it does make sobering reading - there were many instances that my tests were not compared. One of the worse ones was a report from my Psychiatrist in 1996 when he stated that sectioning me under the Mental Health Act would be unnecessary - hey he was ignored and I spent a month locked up in a secure unit!!!

Right I must move on - I have now requested copies of my file from DWP & ATOS. As regards costs, yes, my GP is charging me £125 for a report and copies of their files, and £250 for each of my two Consultants to give an opinion on all of my various illnesses.

All of this to prove ATOS wrong!!! AND the whole ball will start rolling again when I put my claim in for DLA and no doubt a further medical re my ESA claim in time to come!!! Where does it end???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...