Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  So brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details so first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it ,this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025 so slightly longer than the original tax set up so all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. So I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled so I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
    • Do you also own land the garages on and the private road? Or is it shared freehold with right of access to all freeholders or why?  Dx  
    • I may try cheap plastic bollards (traffic cones) first just to see if they get moved.  I will look into the cost of fixed bollards.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Ref Agency reply to DPA s.12 request-help please


Number6
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4848 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 525
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I did intend to mail it recorded anyway, just thought I'd fax a copy as well to give them a bit more time, kind soul that I am! :)

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent it recorded delivery today.

 

I shall await developments with interest.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, this looks great to me.

One thing that I picked up in Surlybonds postings and where I think Tinkerbelle is coming from is that if you have had credit with an organisation they automatically update the CRA's every month for 6 years, so if you stop them rather than the CRA's then you have achieved the objective and removed the monthly updates. If the contract has ceased then the argument is also that they should stop the processing, which of course they don't. Removing the ability of the CRA's to process the data stops them supplying anyone else and they are going to be a bit shell shocked because nothing like this has ever threatened their existance - and it does BIG TIME :-D .

 

I take the argument that you can use the CRA to your advantage by clearing the historical information but remaining on it sufficiently enough so as not to create a kind of ' black list' - if your not on it you have something to hide approach.

 

They'll find a way of interpreting a 'non shower' you can guarantee.

 

This is going to be very interesting as I think the above letter is well structured to get the answers needed. Good luck and well done

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, this looks great to me.

One thing that I picked up in Surlybonds postings and where I think Tinkerbelle is coming from is that if you have had credit with an organisation they automatically update the CRA's every month for 6 years, so if you stop them rather than the CRA's then you have achieved the objective and removed the monthly updates. If the contract has ceased then the argument is also that they should stop the processing, which of course they don't. Removing the ability of the CRA's to process the data stops them supplying anyone else and they are going to be a bit shell shocked because nothing like this has ever threatened their existance - and it does BIG TIME :-D .

 

I take the argument that you can use the CRA to your advantage by clearing the historical information but remaining on it sufficiently enough so as not to create a kind of ' black list' - if your not on it you have something to hide approach.

 

They'll find a way of interpreting a 'non shower' you can guarantee.

 

This is going to be very interesting as I think the above letter is well structured to get the answers needed. Good luck and well done

 

I do understand the logic of getting the creditor to remove any defaults etc and I agree that that is the way to go for most people.

 

What I'm doing is more by way of an experiment. A) I want to see how easy it is to get the CRA's to sit up and take notice of the fact that they are NOT all-powerful demi-gods and that they have to comply fully with the Data Protection Act. B) I want to see what actually does happen when I apply for credit after having got my data removed.

 

It's obvious from the responses so far from the CRA's that they seem to be self-delusional and assume that they can do what the hell they want; that attitude rubs me up the wrong way and makes me more determined to do something about it.

 

I'll keep you all informed as I go along.

 

Cheers.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

I now have a reply from Callcredit, basically saying bog off.

 

the relevant paragraph is (paraphrased slightly):

 

"The element of the Data Protection Act to which you have referred relates to automated credit decision making, which is carried out by organisations who process credit applications. Our role as CRA is to provide accurate data and products. We do not play any role in the actual acceptance or rejection of credit applications.

 

For our part, we ensure that we take active steps to ensure (?) that the data we provide is accurate. Only if it is innacurate do we take steps to amend or remove the data.

 

Now to me this is buls**t. Section 12(1) of the Data Protection Act states:

 

An individual is entitled at any time, by notice in writing to any data controller, to require the data controller to ensure that no decision taken by or on behalf of the data controller which significantly affects that individual is based solely on the processing by automatic means of personal data in respect of which that individual is the data subject for the purpose of evaluating matters relating to him such as, for example, his performance at work, his creditworthiness, his reliability or his conduct.

 

I interpret this as stating that the CRA has to take steps to ensure that the data is not processed automatically, not just the applicant company.

 

What does the panel think?

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they might be asking themselves the question " what contract do we have with the customer that gives us the right to process his/her data and supply it to anyone who asks " The DPA forbids it without your permission. They are struggling for words - choking with a bit of luck! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This reply is going to Callcredit:

 

"Dear Mr Ward,

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

I do not agree with your claim that Callcredit is not subject to Part 2 Section 12(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998. The relevant paragraph reads:

 

“An individual is entitled at any time, by notice in writing to any data controller, to require the data controller to ensure that no decision taken by or on behalf of the data controller which significantly affects that individual is based solely on the processing by automatic means of personal data in respect of which that individual is the data subject for the purpose of evaluating matters relating to him such as, for example, his performance at work, his creditworthiness, his reliability or his conduct.”

 

You will note that nowhere does it mention any role in the acceptance or otherwise of credit applications, merely that any Data Controller must ensure that no decision is taken based on automated processing of subject data. This does not refer solely to the prospective lender but to any Data Controller involved in the process and this includes Callcredit.

 

Callcredit is making my subject data available to any applicant via an automated process and without Callcredit holding any contract or other permission from me to store or process it by any means, let alone by an automated process. If you disagree with this statement please send me a true and certified copy of the contract whereby I have agreed that you may hold and process my data. You will of course be aware that breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 is a criminal offence.

 

I repeat my demand that you remove all data relating to me from any of your systems that allow the data to be automatically processed. I will give you a further seven days to conform with this demand following which I will commence legal action to enforce your compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998; this action will incur fees and costs for which you may become liable.

 

I look forward to receiving your confirmation by close of business on 8th September 2006."

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might wanna throw this in for good measure also. It's from the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

Part XII

Supplemental

 

 

General

 

174 Restrictions on disclosure of information.

 

(1) No information obtained under or by virtue of this Act about any individual shall be disclosed without his consent.

 

It then goes on to list some exceptions none of which is a Credit Reference Agency.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

The full list of exceptions can be found in the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which is now in the library.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Tinkerbelle. I have thrown it in.

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

S12 of the DPA doesn't refer to how credit reference agencies produce your credit report, it relates to how lenders use this and other information when deciding whether or not to lend. If a particular lender bases their lending decisions solely on credit scoring then you have the right under S12 to have your application reviewed manually - that is all. In fact, most lenders voluntarily did this before this right was added to our data protection legislation in 1998. So I think you are all barking up the wrong tree. If you're in any doubt I suggest you seek advice from the Office of the Information Commissioner.

 

Of course, if information should be removed from a credit report we will happily check with the provider and remove it.

 

James Jones

Experian

Link to post
Share on other sites

S12 of the Data Protection Act doesn't refer to how credit reference agencies produce your credit report, it relates to how lenders use this and other information when deciding whether or not to lend. If a particular lender bases their lending decisions solely on credit scoring then you have the right under S12 to have your application reviewed manually - that is all. In fact, most lenders voluntarily did this before this right was added to our data protection legislation in 1998. So I think you are all barking up the wrong tree. If you're in any doubt I suggest you seek advice from the Office of the Information Commissioner.

 

Of course, if information should be removed from a credit report we will happily check with the provider and remove it.

 

James Jones

Experian

 

Thank you for your advice.

 

I and others do not agree with your interpretation. A test case via the legal system should settle the matter one way or the other.

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually James, while you're here perhaps you could give us Experian's views on the following?:

 

In what way exactly does Experian, or any other CRA have the right to store and process private personal data? I have no contract with Experian, nor have I issued Experian with any permission to hold or process or pass on my data.

 

So why do you feel you have the right to do so? I am interested in an explanation.

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice.

 

I and others do not agree with your interpretation. A test case via the legal system should settle the matter one way or the other.

 

It might also be expensive for you and others, so you should seriously consider seeking legal advice or, at least, advice from our regulator first.

 

Regards

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually James, while you're here perhaps you could give us Experian's views on the following?:

 

In what way exactly does Experian, or any other CRA have the right to store and process private personal data? I have no contract with Experian, nor have I issued Experian with any permission to hold or process or pass on my data.

 

So why do you feel you have the right to do so? I am interested in an explanation.

 

We are licensed under the Consumer Credit Act to operate a consumer credit reference agency in the UK. So as long as we adhere to the obligations placed upon us by that legislation, by the Data Protection Act and any other relevant legislation we have a right to operate our business. We also go beyond the letter of the law as we are a responsible and reputable business. In fact, we are currently UK business of the year.

 

Of course, one of the fundamental principles of data sharing in the UK is that data can only be shared and stored with the consumer's consent, unless the data is in the public domain already. That is why lenders obtain your consent, (when you apply for credit) to check your credit report, for a record of the check to be retained by the CRA, and for information about any subsequent account you are granted to be shared with other lenders through the CRAs, to promote responsible lending, fight fraud etc.

 

If you really want to wipe data off your credit report (and in my opinion you would be crazy to do so as you would end up with a very, very low credit score making obtaining any sort of credit unnecessarily difficult) you would need to contact the lenders you had previously given consent to share your data to and ask them if you can now withdraw it. I think in practice you'd find they'd say no as it was an element of the legally-binding contract you entered into with them.

 

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

i fail to see how you feel you are beyond the letter of the law irrespective of how many awards you hold. my brother in law holds a consumer credit license but is not above the letter of the law.!! in reality you are i beileve a business like any other company granted a consumer credit license and are bound by the terms of the data protection and consumer credit laws as laid down in those laws, as are we.

"ALWAYS QUOTE ME AS BEING MISQUOTED" :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to remember that Enron was US business of the year for quite a few years...!!!

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

JamesJ

 

On who's authority do you have the right to give my data to anyone else without my explicit permission?

 

If I do give my permission by way of signature on a contract with a financial institution to share my data with third parties such as yourselves, from where do you derive the right to process that data thereafter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman
JamesJ

 

On who's authority do you have the right to give my data to anyone else without my explicit permission?

 

If I do give my permission by way of signature on a contract with a financial institution to share my data with third parties such as yourselves, from where do you derive the right to process that data thereafter?

nice concept
Link to post
Share on other sites

We are licensed under the Consumer Credit Act to operate a consumer credit reference agency in the UK. So as long as we adhere to the obligations placed upon us by that legislation, by the Data Protection Act and any other relevant legislation we have a right to operate our business. We also go beyond the letter of the law as we are a responsible and reputable business. In fact, we are currently UK business of the year.

 

Of course, one of the fundamental principles of data sharing in the UK is that data can only be shared and stored with the consumer's consent, unless the data is in the public domain already. That is why lenders obtain your consent, (when you apply for credit) to check your credit report, for a record of the check to be retained by the CRA, and for information about any subsequent account you are granted to be shared with other lenders through the CRAs, to promote responsible lending, fight fraud etc.

 

If you really want to wipe data off your credit report (and in my opinion you would be crazy to do so as you would end up with a very, very low credit score making obtaining any sort of credit unnecessarily difficult) you would need to contact the lenders you had previously given consent to share your data to and ask them if you can now withdraw it. I think in practice you'd find they'd say no as it was an element of the legally-binding contract you entered into with them.

 

James

 

Perhaps you would like to comment on this quote from one of your competitor CCA's:

 

"it is necessasry for that company to carry out a credit search therefore, as a Credit Reference Agency Equifax must provide this information and cannot prevent any company from accessing your information automatically"

 

Note that they use "must" and "cannot prevent" as though they delusionally see themselves as some sort of quasi-legal or official body which of course they're not, and neither is Experian. You're just data processing companies that sell private information to anyone that wants it and you have no more right than me to act as though you are above the law.

 

Is it not in fact true that you cannot disclose information about any third party without their express consent? I note James that you made no comment to my specific question as to why you think you have permission to disclose my data. A lender may have permission to pass my information to you or anyone else but that does not give Experian or any other CRA the right to pass that information on to anyone else, you need my direct permission for that. Please directly answer that question.

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

bar the exclusions in schedule 2 which are very restrictive...they can only disclose data with your permission..., given when an application is made with a credit company, how are they able to maintain that agreement for the six year period that they use if your agreement is terminated in less than that period? surely your agreement ended there and with it there rights of disclosure?

"ALWAYS QUOTE ME AS BEING MISQUOTED" :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

also when we do agree to allow data to be shared with a credit ref agency i have not read one that defines any 6 year term from completion or default of an agreement...correct me if i am wong? does this not breech your agreement and question the validity of the data you relay?

"ALWAYS QUOTE ME AS BEING MISQUOTED" :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...