Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

arrow global llc and i , Further help required. - BATTLE CONTINUES


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4798 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

good evening all

well today i recieved some good news, albiet not form arrow global but from LOWELLS but in some ways runs along side this thread as this arrow thing cincerns cap 1 so does this

the wife had a cap 1 account but did SAR and guess what cap 1 could not produce original credit agreement and it is now closed, one down and one to go as this is also a cap one thing with arrow, so bring it on i am ready

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 254
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

recieved yesterday from bc's litigation office that they are to reply to my letters sent to them

 

i originally sent an sar and cca but they never responded so i took to sending them the same letter everyday via recorded and email also stating that the postal order is placed in the original letter and still awaiting cashing i then recieved email stating thankyou for your letters,,,,,,,, lol and we will reply to you by letter at the earliest instance once all information has been collated

a small victory in itself methinks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

hi all

long time no posting on here but nothing to report till today

i have my transfer to southampton, recieved letter from ux cc

today

yesterday recieved letters from BC AND AG

bc stating that

we act as a data processor and not a data controller

we are instructed by arrow global, and if you require docs, please write to them, any data we retain is legally privillaged

and from AG

WE DO NOT ACCEPT WE ARE Creditor as envisaged by above statute

however we are willing to assist in obtaining that which we have been requested we will now process your request for docs from the creditor and will revert in due course

we confirm that all collectiob activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents

how am i doing so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

As soon as I saw the Name Bryan Carter it all clicked into place.

Mr Carter is notorious for filing claims at a 'last known' address and then miraculously discovering your new address days after judgement.

You need to contact the Court that issued the CCJ.(Northampton( and see if you can have a copy of the judgement. Once you know what it is for then you can start a set aside.

Although a charging order is not a good thing, its not the end of the world if one is obtained as once a judgement ios set aside then the charging order can be removed since there is no judgment order to be enforced.

If as you seem to think, it originated from Fredericksons who have failed to reply to CCA requests, then thats a good start as it probably means there is no agreement and thats the first reason to use on a set aside request.

Once you have more information than more precise help will be forthcoming.

Tha last statement saying all collection activity will be ceased baffles me...have they been collecting from you since this judgement has appeared out of the blue.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where ever Carters fingerprints are, take nothing for granted.

Unless you receive confirmation in writing that the hearing is cancelled, attend the Court and I will bet you a pound to a penny that they will still be there hoping to win by default again.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

have already recieved letter from court stating that i have the cancellatino to southampton cc and to apply for a set aside

i think it originally went to ux cc because BC are in weybridge just down the road from ux

now they will have to travel

plus i am now getting all info from AG about cca and sar from cap 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

FINALLY ihave my hearing in southampton

it is on 2-8-10

still have not had any SAR OR CCA either from ag or bc or fi

neither have i recieved anything from cap one

is this agood arguement for court

also looking for other people who have had probs with either of these firms so i can bring it up in court on their practices

all help needed

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bobbydog

 

Glad to hear you have at last got a hearing in Southampton.

 

I'm not surprised that you haven't had anything yet from AG or BC. Some solicitors seem to respond to requests for documentation by filing a witness statement with the documents a few days before the hearing of the application. They should file such statements seven days before the hearing, so they often fax the documents to the court exactly seven days before (usually late in the day), and then send a copy ot you by second class mail, so the documents take a few days longer to get to you. Other solicitors just send the documents to arrive on the day of the hearing, which is what AG did with me. The idea is to leave you in the dark and unprepared for as long as possible. Fortunately, the judge in my case was P##sed off with AG and I eventually won my case.

 

The SAR and the CCA request you have sent are fine but I think you need to be asking for documents using the court's own rules on disclosure [CPR 31]. Problem is you don't know what documents have been supoosedly served on you. The only was you can find out is to visit the Southampton county court and look at the court file to view the papers that will have been sent from Northampton & Uxbridge.

 

If you can get to the court, see if there is a claim form (N1) or other document setting out the Particulars of Claim [POCs] on the file and take a copy. The court can charge you 50p per page for copies with a minimum charge of £5. Get a receipt for all the money laid out including any travel costs and wages lost from attending the court. You are going to be claiming all these back from AG. Once you have the POCs, you will be in a better position to know what documents you should ask AG for.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

as per post *10*

that is exactly the paperwork i have

IS IT enforcable

tried reading thruogh the pages but it got bogged down with a lot of other people wanting help but not having threads of their oown

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bobbydog,

 

I don't think I count as a 'pro' - and postggi is being too modest about his knowledge. IMO, the Capital One 'agreement' and T&Cs sent to you by AG aren't worth the paper they are copied on.

 

You have submitted a witness statement saying you haven't got an agreement etc etc. You must now expect that a rent-a-solicitor will turn up at the court hearing in Southampton and try to argue that the 'agreement' is valid and that your application should be thrown out. So you will have to plan to answer them.

 

Have you visited the Southampton County Court and looked at what is on the file? If not, it would be a wise investment of your time now, if only to make yourself familiar with the location and general layout of the court.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know docman, you are always there at the end of the threads

what i need to know is HOW is this not worth the paper it is written on, this is going to be my arguement in court so i need to get it right

am visiting court friday

what precedences are there to invalidate this paperwork

Link to post
Share on other sites

i cannot just go there and say they arnt worth the paper they are written on

i need help in formalising a step by step plan of action

 

i want to nail these b%%gers once and for all, and to also have the paperwork and plan to help others in this situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

ime doing a letter for another cagger at the moment

 

ill do a rough witness statement for you later tonight

 

i know its a tall order but you need to start to try and understand the cca and enforceability

 

that link i posted

 

is my agreement enforceable usefull is a start

 

try and understand it

 

i know its hard, it took me three years

Link to post
Share on other sites

bobbydog

 

A witness statement from postggi will be a good place to start. You will need to know what is already on the court file before you send the statement anywhere.

 

It may be that there are no documents on the court file at all, in which case your witness statement will have to point out what SHOULD be in an agreement. If the file contains a copy of Capital One's agreement, your statement will have to deal with that and point out where there are deficiencies. I'm sure that between us, postggi and I can come up with a statement that will deal with the specifics.

 

Finally, there could be nothing on file but the rent-a-solicitor turns up on the day with a copy of the Capital One agreement. In this case, you need to have something to speak to, like a kind of script, to get your point across.

 

Firt thing though is to find out what's on the court file.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...