Jump to content


Insolvency on a default CCJ? thoughts please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello quick round up

 

I have a default judgement entered against me and a high court writ to enforce collection of a debt of £10,000.

 

Now I have never signed a credit agreement with this company and I know they can't supply one. I've pin pointed the point they upgraded my trade account to a credit one and have evidence that supports this action on their part as a method to push sales of their stock on me without ever making credit agreements or terms clear.

My business was destroyed by fire so I have no records to calculate if the amount owed is correct at all but I have evidence to suggest its not collectable under the CCA1974.

 

I also have evidence to suggest they had my contact details for 12 months before they took legal action but never contacted me prior to this and only took legal action once I moved house.

I believe I can demonstrate that they may have intentionally obtained judgement by default.

 

Financally I am am unemployed and a full time homemaker with three dependents. I am not married but my partner works and we are in receipt of tax credits.

In the eyes of the law we have little if any disposible income and we have no assests of any sort.

 

So far I have attempted set aside but failed on remission of fees due to incomplete evidence, I am going to try again as soon as I correct that as I can't really afford the court costs.

I have also outlined my defence to the solicators and the claimant and have just recently wrote tot he claimant requesting everything they have on me under data protection.

I have also gone to great lengths to outline how I don't believe they have a case and even if a court rules me liable after seeing all the evidence they would be recieving a token payment or prehaps even full set aside till I can afford to repay.

 

What I'm worried about is if they apply for insolvency, can they do it based on what I've said here? If they can and I know its a complicated issue and anything anyone says is only an opinon but does anyone think they would be successful based on what I have so far?

I have no repayment arrangment in place as all I've done so far is force the bailiffs to return it twice and refused to pay until I see the evidence and informed the solicators of this fact.

 

I'm determined to fight this but I'd like some help over the insolvency prospect as I've basically said to them that I'm never going to admit liability until a court sees the evidence and rules me liable.

 

I do understand their other options and what the outcome of those could be but insolvency is something I need more info on.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I've sent that but no response as yet but they still have weeks to respond

 

 

I'll check back in later as my connection is playing up thanks so far for everyone who has looked at this

Edited by viking657
poor internet connection
Link to post
Share on other sites

all you can do at the moment is wait for the SAR to be complied with ,as for setting aside you need to enter into your defense that the company you are trying to deal with has been unprepared to supply you with the neccessary document ie contract agreement and all data concerning yourself,this should include statements and all mail to and fro they have chosen to ignore the due proccess and you would like to put it to the judge that he make an order for you to receive this information...the default judgement was done without any notice to yourself in order for you to have defended the action..and You were not fully aware of your legal rights at the time is another point

if the account has been passed to a debt collectors then you also send this ..

Letter when account has been passed on whilst agreement request is in dispute

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks patrickq1 I guess I wait to see if they comply with the subjetc access request and incorporate what you have said into my evidence for set aside.

 

Like I said I've already applied once and it was purely the remission of fees that prevented the application from going through and the annoying thing is I know I'm entitled.

It didn't go through as I pay my rent via bank transfer by arrangement with the landlord and so when the courts say this on my bank statements they requested to see the details of that bank account that the money was going to!

Didn't fancy asking the landlord for his account details lol so I've set up a standing order so just need to wait for that to be reflected in my bank statements.

 

You don't have any other ideas as to how to prove to the court this is were that money went without supplying my landlords bank statements by any chance? If that was possible I could reapply straight away

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have any other ideas as to how to prove to the court this is were that money went without supplying my landlords bank statements by any chance? If that was possible I could reapply straight away

 

your own direct debit or bank transfer statements should show where the money has gone also you only need a letter of proof from your landlord that he is in receipt of your payments ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

One small point : in your first post you mention a trade account. If you mean a business account then such accounts aren't covered by the Consumer Credit Act.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello palomino,

 

Thanks for the input very worrying possibility!

 

I was a sole trader not a company or anything. My pro forma account I opened was in my name not the business.

The company in question just simply upgraded my account to credit after 7 months of trading with them without even asking or explaining the terms of such an arrangement.

I never signed any agreement with them and I'm sure they had to have one as other suppliers I used at the time required full credit checks, credit agreements etc etc.

 

I would be grateful if you could expand on what you said Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...