Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Marcus will cut the rate on its easy-access savings account to 4.55% from Saturday - can you find better rates elsewhere?View the full article
    • Legal claim alleges Steam's market dominance means consumers are paying too much for video games.View the full article
    • In-person collaboration has been linked to high performance and job satisfaction, but these benefits don't increase with more days spent in the office.View the full article
    • We need to see the actual document from the IAS where it is written - "The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." You can't just type it up yourself. At the hearing in July or August or whenever the judge will have two Witness Statements. One from Bank's director says you never made a second appeal. You say you did make a second appeal and the IAS concluded that payment was made. The judge will immediately twig that either you or the director is lying.  But who? Fail to show the documentation form the IAS and instead just produce something you've typed yourself will make it look like you just made up the appeal and you are lying and you will lose the case. Please let us see what the IAS adjudicator sent.
    • I used to have a retail outlet in London selling my husband's photography.  We also had a co-op with staff so they weren't directly employed by me, but I paid for the other overheads etc.  When my husband died, I carried on as usual for a while but then I became ill and moved quite far away so logistically was becoming very difficult.  I came to an arrangement (verbal) with one of the guys I trusted, that I would send him the images to print and sell as normal, and I wouldn't take any money, as a short term solution until I got back on my feet and worked out the best way to do things. He would pay all the  rent, insurance etc... Over a year later, not able to give things away for free anymore,  I drew up a contract as a wholesale agreement, so I would get everything printed and sent to him and I would invoice his for what he ordered. I noticed form the beginning that he wasn't ordering enough or frequently enough to be making any money, and was suspicious he was doing his own orders on the sly and ordering just enough from me to keep my happy.  I checked with my printer, which I've been with for 20 years, and he sad he wasn't getting orders for my images from anyone else. I emailed a few other printers to ask them to keep a look out for some images but I soon realised this would be impossible to police.  The only option really would be to buy a print from him and check the stamp on the back of it.  I finally managed to get hold of on the prints on sale, and sure enough, he did not order it through me.   In the contract he signed in 2022 it explicitly states that he must destroy all files I had previously sent him etc etc so e is in breach of that.  When I drew up the contract, I was careful to make sure it was legally binding, but before I let rip at him, I need to know where I stand.  The contract is here: PARTIES This WHOLESALE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective as of 30th June, 2022, by and between ############################## The Supplier and the Client, collectively referred to as the "Parties," hereby agree to the following terms: TERMS AND CONDITIONS SALES OF GOODS The Supplier agrees to provide the following goods to the Client (“Goods”): Description of Goods ################################# Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b BOTH PARTIES AGREE: The Client purchases the Goods through the Supplier directly, and agrees to delete/destroy any previously held digital images (Goods) owned by the Supplier, and agrees not to use any such files for monetary gain, outside of this agreement, either directly or through a third party from immediate effect of this agreement. The Client purchases the other materials necessary for resale of the Goods independently of this agreement. The Client shall have exclusive rights for resale of Goods at ###########, and also with permission, as a retailer of the Goods elsewhere, provided that there is no conflict of interest between the Supplier and the Client. The Client is free to decide their own retail prices, for the Goods. The Supplier shall use #####  to provide the printed Goods on Fujifilm Crystal Archive paper, with Lustre finish, and will not use any other Printer unless #### cease to trade, without prior approval from the Client. The Supplier shall not impose restrictions on size or frequency of orders made by the Client. The prices provided by the Supplier shall not increase for a minimum of 3 years, unless the prices of the raw materials rise, in which case the client will be informed immediately. Any discounts/promotional prices of raw materials shall be passed on to the Client by the Supplier, and the invoice will show adjustments for this, as well as credit for return postage of any damaged goods. This agreement can be terminated by the Client without notice; the Supplier must give notice of no less than 90 days, unless the terms of the agreement are breached, in which case, the agreement can be terminated with immediate effect. PAYMENT Orders must be paid for upon receipt of invoice, via Bank transfer: ######### Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b DELIVERY AND INSPECTIONS All orders received by 12.00am (midnight) shall be processed by the Supplier the following working day and delivery of order shall arrive in accordance with the Royal Mail schedule, or DPD, should express delivery be requested. The Client shall be liable for the delivery charge which shall be added to the invoice. The Goods will be delivered to the address specified by the Client. The Client shall be provided with order tracking, and should any problems arise with the ordering system or the couriers (Royal Mail, DPD), the Client shall be informed without delay of any such issues. The Client will inspect the Goods and report any defects or damage to the Goods in transit as soon as possible upon receipt of Goods, and will retain damaged Goods for return to Supplier for refund/replacement. GENERAL PROVISIONS CONFIDENTIALITY The prices of the Goods and other information contained in this Agreement is confidential and will not be disclosed by either party unless with prior written consent of the other party. INDEMNIFICATION The Client indemnifies the Supplier from any claims, liabilities, and expenses made by any third party vendors or customers of the Client. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with UK Law. ACCEPTANCE Both parties understand and accept the wholesale arrangement stipulated under this Agreement. Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Wholesale Agreement as of the day and year set forth above.   Signed by us both electronically.   I haven't broached any of this yet, and I am looking for some advice about what action to take.  The main issue I've got is that he has still go those images.  If I terminate the contract, I will need to know that he no longer has those images and I can't think of a bulletproof way to do this. I'm thinking I might tell him I will continue with the contract but ask for a  sum in damages and say that if I find out he's still doing it down the line I will terminate the contract and sue him for damages. The damages side of things I'm not sure how it would work as he is self employed, and I'm positive he doesn't declare all of his earnings to HMRC, in order to find out how much I have lost, would the court demand to go through his tax self assessments?  I'm not sure how to proceed with this, I don't want to lose that place as an outlet as it is in a prime spot in London, which is why I let him have those images in the first place as I would have had to pull out altogether at that point.  I am regretting it somewhat now though.  Please help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jacobs Bailiffs


Guest Zooman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Zooman

Jacobs Bailiffs enforce liability orders for over 50 Local Authorities throughout England and Wales.

I am going to make a mass complaint to the Local Authority Ombudsman, about Jacobs Bailiffs collecting council tax and the lack of fair treatment it gives the public. I am collecting information about them breaking rules.

if you have had dealing with Jacobs Bailiffs and are willing to make a written statement about your dealings with them I am very interested and the more testimonials the better chance I have of having them blacklisted and their replacement acting in a lawful and fair manner.

I am also interested in any of the following evidence.

  • Letters which have added threats of prison etc in handwritten red ink.
  • Letters that imply that they are going to break into your home when they have no levy.
  • Letters saying they recommend that you go to prison.
  • Charges that exceed that set down is statue.

Please PM me and I will give you my postal address to post them to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ,

 

I have a letter from Jacobs saying:

 

'we now have no alternative but to return the liability ordr to the local authority with a recommendation that the council apply to have you committed to prison for up to 90 days'

 

It was in relation to Business rates payable to Islington Council.

 

Scared the pants off me when it came!

 

Cheers,

 

Jojo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Brother are they in deep do do.

 

Also what makes them think they can reccomend anything to the council let alone prison.

 

Suggesting they can is a criminal offence & amounts to Demanding Money with

Menaces as well as Criminal Harrassment

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll search through all the paperwork, i may have some letters. Not sure if I can be of any help as i work for a local authority and will be dealing with council tax issues soon. But had a really bad experience where i was marched off to a cash point machine and made to take out over £400 while my newborn baby was screaming his head off! I felt so angry that they had made me do this. They gave me a lift to the cashpoint machine but couldn't be bothered to take me back once they got their money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm Having a go at them at mo! I was handed to them after failing to pay my council tax. After paying a set rate for a few months they then upped it which I couldnt afford. Then they came for the balance or the furniture would go. Recently I did a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on them and got the charges all of which seem to be fair apart from the "hire of a van and waiting time (£140 )" coincidently on the same day I paid up fully. strange thing was the amount asked for a few days previously seemed to include this. Of course no van turned up or no notice was given to me that a van had been charged.

 

I'm going to get them

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I to had a dealing with these to late now i know but they came to my house on fridday morning demanding £814 he was very abrubt and i was upset he started laughing at me in front of my children and was not willing to listen. Anyway i later rang him to try and sort this out as he came on the friday and wanted the money by monday at 2pm when i rang him he put the phone down on me he is a mean and spiteful little man. The courts told me and the council told me that they have lots of problems with them

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am gonna submit a complaint about Jacobs as a friend of mine seems to know everything and he told me i have grounds for a complaint as he never wanted to listen to me and put the phone down on me he could have offered me ways to pay but was just rude and laughing at me in front of my children.

When i went to the council about the debt they rang the balliff for me and i can pay £20 per week why did he not offer me this option.

My question is who do i cmplain to Jacobs i do not really want to i wanna go higher

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have had dealings - in Leyland, Preston, PR25.

I involved the Police as one threatened to 'come through the door'. When the Police arrived I supplied the car reg number and it seems that Leyland police were/are actively chasing that car because of other 'alleged' threats.

 

I tried to contact the boss of Jacobs but was refused by some female voice.

I contacted the local council and they made Ms McGarry of Jacobs ring to apologise.

They are a bad piece of work, but you need to know how to deal with them. I believe I have done so and that, with luck, and the odd threat to the council, they will be removed from handling South Ribble BC work.

I do have 'printed' demands in red.

I am presently dealing direct with the council and I will VERY CERTAINLY be bringing more complaints about Jacobs.

 

If you want further contact reply first to this and see where we go.

Thanks

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

my partner had dealing with them and altho they did not threaten him or anything, the did make a walking possesion order and failed to give us a copy of it, which is bad practice from what i can gather.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone wasn't aware....have a look at Jacobs official website (FAQ section) - where mention of being able to remove vehicles if entry isnt possible, and minor prison threats in view of council tax are mentioned!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Contrary to what they'll tell you, they don't have a power of entry for council tax arrears.

 

The only time a bialiff has a power of entry if for Magistrates Court Fines and some Inland Revenue related stuff but they need a special warrant for that.

 

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD YOU OPEN THE DOOR TO THEM. They will try and barge past you in order to gain entry because when they're in they will claim 'peaceable access' has been obtained which then gives them powers of entry on future visits.

 

They are not allowed to force their way in. If they door. Call the police and inform them that a bailiff, without a power of entry, has assualted you to gain access to your property. They are also notorious for blagging plod when they arrive and will try and misrepresent their powers to the cops who are their only to prevent a breach of the peace - the police are not there to assist debt collectors!

 

The stated case they carry around is R - v - Bibby where a bailiff was arrested to prevent a further breach of the peace. The point with this case is that previous peaceable access had been obtained by the bailiff previously. If they push past you to get in the first time then that stated case is redundant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct bladeboy

 

If I recall correctly the case you mention involved a debtors place of business & not a private dwelling & the copper didn't arrest him because they wanted to enter but because he felt that any attempt would result in violence & the bailiff would not back off so the copper arrested him before it got bloody. If I'm correct the debtor, who may have been either Turkish or Asian had a few 'friends' arrive

Link to post
Share on other sites

What worries me and the various debt charities a bit now is this new courts enforcements bill that the hypocritical and opinionated Harriet Harman mentioned in the commons. Her argument was that bailiff law was far too complex. So their response? Blanket increasing of powers! - way to go new labour!!!

 

There is also great concern that the safeguards surrounding this have not been given sufficient parlimentary time.

 

It's just a case of watch this space.

 

From my professional experience bailiff are no better than rougue vehicle clampers and the like. But hey, it's an industry that essentially collects its own wages for goodness sake - there are bound to be problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have a debt of £756 for this years council tax that has been passed to Jacobs in November.

I wrote to them in November, with an offer to pay £40 a month with a financial statement explaining why I can only pay that much, with ccj's listed. They said I would hear from them.

I heard nothing untill I got a 'Final Notice - Removal' letter. I then phoned again and was told there was nothing they could now do as it was in the hands of the local agent.

Having spoken to him on the phone he is telling me the bill, with charges, is now £1007.50. He will accept nothing less than £250 a month, with the first installment being due by Christmas Eve. (Funny that, as I see from their website they are closed from then on till Jan 5th with no enforcement visits during that time!)

I spoke to my council offering £100 a month but they are saying they refuse to take the debt back unless I clear it within 3 months.

 

My questions are, if someone could help?

 

a) The bailiff in question has told me he will be 'round at 11am on Thursday to collect first installment and to come in to list my possesions'. Am I really within my rights not to let him in? Should I contact him first to tell him (He told me I could contact him via text message!)

b) I wish to pay £100 a month, preferably direct to the council. Is there a way I can make them accept? Is it best to make payments anyway in the meantime? Is it best to pay them or should I do it via Jaccobs website? (Are they allowed to insist 'payment is not sent to the council' as they do in their letter?

 

Many thanks for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your information.

 

I spoke to the council today, who as you predicted said they'd 'prefer not to accept payment'. I told them I was only willing to deal with them and they said that I could do that but would find that the bailiffs would not stop calling and I "may find them rather unpleasent".

 

I have, so far, stuck to my guns and said that I will be making my first payment to them shortly. I will pay online now, and the same again next month.

 

Can you also tell me how this will work with the charges they have put on the account so far? (£356 already, which I will query) Will they eventually drop off when they return the case to the council?

 

Also, how long should I expect them to try before they return the debt?

 

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi chrysalliss ive had good help and advice off people on here dont open door to bailiff dont leave doors and windows open pay council tax direct pay only what you can afford each month online to council website make sure you have council account number for this years council tax DONT PAY BAILIFF just keep paying online there are some good template letters on here to help you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I refer to recent correspondence.

XXX Council has appointed you to recover my Council Tax Liability arrears for 200x of £xxxx.

 

Firstly I would like to make you aware that I am fully aware of my rights and you will not gain entry to my home under any circumstances to levy goods and I know the fees allowed under statue and when these fees can be applied.

have been making payments of £10 per week for the last 8 weeks and I calculate the balance to be £xxx.xx.

 

Due to my circumstances I am unable to pay this the balance in one payment. I advocate a payment schedule of 19 months with 18 months payments at £43.33 and the balance of £70.06 to be paid on the 19th month to cover the principle. I understand this may seem a long time but this is a realistic offer that is affordable to me and will allow me to pay future bills issued for Council Tax without them falling into arrears. A greater amount would cause me real and factually hardship.

 

I am able to pay the above amount on the xx of each month, as an act of good faith I have enclosed the first payment chq number xxxxxx. Please advise how you would like future payments made. My personal preference is payment by Standing Order.

 

It should be noted that I am not at any point refusing to pay this debt but only asking for a fair payment period considering my circumstances. And if you are unable to accept my offer I will place the money aside each month until such a time the council take the account back into their management, when I will make payment of the set aside money to the council.

I have enclosed a statement of my means as requested by Miss Smith in our telephone conversion today, explain here about the money and that it has been sent before.

Also Miss Smith said I have to send proof that I am paying my other creditors the lowest amount they will allow and gave me 14 days to do this. I find this unwarranted and frankly an intrusion into my privacy I have written under separate cover making an official complaint to my Council over it policy to request this information as I do not believe the council should demand that they must have this information.

 

Please also send an itemised statement of account that clearly shows what charges have been added and what for, you are required in statue to supply this information and I look forward to this within 14 days.

 

I am sending the council a copy of this letter and requesting that it be filled with my account for further reference.

 

I hope the above meets your approval and I look forward to your timely reply by letter.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

add your details to temlate letter send one to council and one to bailiff they can only charge for 2 visits £24.50 for the first and £18 for the second.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should also mention when writing to the council that having been told by Mr? Ms? a council employee that Jacobs would still continue to pursue me & might be 'unpleasant' toward me it's clear from that remark the council officers are fully aware of the unlawful & threatening tactics used by the councils agents

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've issues with Jacobs for a parking ticket fine from Wigan MBC.

 

I actually had a ticket that had fallen from the dash, but because I didn't challenge it in a timely manner I accept I should pay the fine. Debt was passed to Jacobs, and all the stock things then happened (Ghost visits - excessive cost etc).

 

So, I texted the bailiff to explain that I would only discuss the matter in a documented way, either by letter or text, due to previous issues. Cue complete ignorance from the bailiff, kept ringing me & demanding money. I rung their office, but they just refused to deal with it.

 

I explained to bailiff that I was under a DMP and could only afford regular payments, not a lump sum, but I also questioned the amount. Once I'd received a full breakdown of costs, I would happily pay by bank transfer as don't have CC (and didn't want to pay extra charges) but I also didn't want to incur extra costs. I also stipulated there was no need to visit again.

 

Next thing, another letter through door with increased costs being demanded. So, I wrote to council complaining of their conduct and emphasising my intention to pay the fine, and appropriate costs, but wanted the opportunity to review the cost schedule in a formal way.

 

I also wrote to Jacobs and put a SAR request to them, and left a copy (with the cheque inside) as the bailiff said he'd be returning. He never did, but in short time I received correspondence from council to say they'd investigated and a far lesser amount was due to bailiff than they claimed, but the debt had to be paid to Jacobs. I had requested to pay the council directly but they refused, saying I had to pay Jacobs for their costs.

 

So, I sent a cheque to them - in hindsight, I should have ensured it was sent recorded (all other correspondence was, but I mistakenly sent it normal mail with other letters that day).

 

However, I've had some problems with the bank account I drew the cheque against, in that the money was in there for the full settlement BUT I'd had some misfortune with not receiving my cash cards, online banking log in, PIN etc and it was effectively a slush account to try and save some money in. Bottom line, I just presumed the cheque would be paid and again, in hindsight I should have been more on the ball in confirming this.

 

However, now - without seemingly any further letters - Jacobs (different bailiff) has appeared and wanted a far increased amount - approx 250 claiming it was all letters, visits etc. When I explained I needed to review his claim, and explained my situation, he simply wasn't interested, saying the money had to be paid within 2 days or he'd be returning and adding more costs.

 

I explained that I wished to address this matter with a third party to review the costs he claimed, as I didn't think the costs were correct, and he said they'd been adjusted for VAT reduction. When I asked if the VAT reduction allowed for the discrepancy the last time (a discrepancy of several hundred pounds) he admitted he'd not read the case notes nor my letters.

 

As usual, his tone was quite arrogant, even threatening, and accusatory - but that's par for the course. I accept there's fault on both parts, but I find they are completely unwilling to listen to anyone or anything unless they can bully money out of people.

 

Question is, what should I do now? Can they charge me for a revisit yesterday? They've my phone number, and they were harrassing when the last time - often ringing 5 or 6 times each incident. This latest fellow was quite forceful in his way, and seemed a 'specialist' in twisting my words and making accusations.

 

I simply can't understand why there isn't a middle ground for bailiff issues. I accept I need to pay what I owe, but it seems like theres never any grounds for reasonableness. I'm aware they generally work on a 'win some lose some' mentality' but one would have thought given my correspondences with them that they may have learned they can't pull their tricks as easy as with some of their victims?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you need to do is tell the bailiff that you have sort advice & that as a result of his threatening behaviour & claiming powers which he does not have you will report him to the court where he is registered with the request that his certificate be removed .......... Let him worry over Xmas for a change

 

DON'T WHATEVER YOU DO NOT LET HIM INTO YOUR HOME. Don't EVEN open the door, talk through the letter box if you must

Link to post
Share on other sites

I told him I needed to seek external advice & he was quite scornful, however he changed his tune during the conversation from having 'two days' to 'new year' when I said I would be in touch & would address the issue.

 

The biggest problem I have with this company is their reluctance & ignorance to have a level conversation, there's always an underlying tone of threat & arrogance IMO. There's no such thing as appealing to a higher level than them, they just bury their head in the sand and accuse of not wanting to pay. I was less than impressed the council either seem to not care about their tactics, or ARE aware and would rather ignore the issue.

 

How's things going with the complaints about them? I will compile my facts on this particular case and I'd happily submit them to you to help.

 

In the meantime, I'm not confident given the way things have developed in this case that to adopt the stance you suggest would actually do anything, they seem that blinkered. However, that said, I'm prepared to do whatever to settle the matter quickly and simply with the least stress, but whilst doing the right thing too.

 

I have already sent them a letter previously - he admitted he didn't know what a Subject Access Request is - based on the templates available through here (the one where it says entry to levy is refused and warning of their conduct) but this guy is obviously another bailiff who, by his own admission hasn't read the case file or the supplied documentation. All he had was a printed form possibly off their computer, and his own stock letter.

 

I will get the figures as raised and then post again on here, and thanks for your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...