Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

old accounting firm i used back in 2000/2004 has lodged a claim against me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4773 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

An old accounting firm i used back in 2000/2004 has lodged a claim against me. They were accountants for my company which ceased trading in 2003. Particulars of claim is

(1) a debt of £ 4810.50 arising from agreements in respect of goods and services particulars of which appear in invoices in April 2004 and

(2) Interest pursuant to S.69 of the County Cort Act 1984 interest particulars 01/06/2004 2096 days @ 8% on 4810.50 # 2200.80 Invoice o. 593738

 

I no longer have details of the agreement or invoices. I ceased using this firm of accountants since 2004.

 

I have not received any reminders or notices.

 

the claim is now made against me personally as opposed to my ex.Ltd company.

 

As the issue date of the claim was 01/03/2010 - i submitted an acknowledgement of Service onm line, just now.

 

I need them to give me copies of allinvoices/agreements i signed

 

I spoke with one of the partners last year. He told me I was personally liable for their fees becuase there is a clause which stated this in the agreement I signed originally. I do not remember reading this.

 

But it was some years ago.

 

In the light of the above - pl advise what I can do to defend this claim and what steps i need to take.

 

Thank you very much

BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. you need to get a copy of that agreement from them

to see whether you are personally liable, do you have it?, if not you can force them to provide

 

Is the company formally wound up i.e. does not exist?

 

Sounds to me like they are p***ing in the wind, for what its worth

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is a genuine debt, they have clearly just realised it is about to become statute barred - hence the urgent activity.

 

Can't be a very good accountant if they missed the fact that someone hadn't paid them nearly five grand for six years...

 

Also, if your company was wound up in 2003, why were they still doing work for you in 2004?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CCM and DB - many thanks for replying

 

CCM -

a) i hv written to their solicitors (Thomas Higgins) asking for copies of everything.

b) Yes company ceased trading and was struck off by Companies house in 2003 - so does not exist.

well i hope they are doing as you say.

 

DB - i think the invoice in Apr 2004 was for work done in 2003 - i wont know till i get the documentation.

 

As I said - i hv done an on-line Acknowledgement of service - which means i now have another 14 days to put in a defence - which i cannot do until i receive copies of documentation from Thomas Higgins.

 

do you know of any forms/guidances/site i can visit to do some research so i can fight this as i am pretty broke at the moment and cannot afford a solicitor.

 

one thing that really bugs me is as i said in my posting - i spoke with one of the partners of the accountants last year - who said that there is a clause in the agreement i signed - where i am to be held personally liable should the company go bankrupt or cease trading. - i do not remember reading this - may be i missed it .... i really cannot remember. I do read everything before i sign anything - so i am disgusted with my self if this was the case. Not with standing this, when you take out a mortgage or a loan - as you are personally liable "... your home may be at risk if you do not keep up the repayments..." are they not obliged to notify that they will hold you presonally liable for their fees should your company cease trading?

 

thanks very much - B/F

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aswell as the Agreement, you should use CPR 31.14 to request a copy of your agreement and the original invoice, along with a breakdown of exactly what the bill is for. If they want to include interest, they should have been sending you statements.

 

The CCA now requires creditors under a regulated fixed sum agreement (with a term of more than 12 months) to provide annual statements. This requirement is contained in a new section 77A of the CCA .Failure to comply with this section will mean that the debtor is not liable to pay interest or other default payments in respect of any period of non compliance when a statement is due, but has not been sent nor will the creditor be able to enforce the agreement during the period. This provision will apply to existing agreements as well as agreements made after commencement of this requirement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - thanks DB and Debbbs.

 

Your comments are very interesting

 

- I am not sure if they have sent statements. I have not seen them.

 

if they were sending statements, they would be addressed to my company whose registered address would be my previous house. The writ is addressed personally to me at my new house.(I moved in 2005)

 

Should I ask to see the statements?

 

As I said I hv written to their solicitors asking for

a) the original agreements

b) all invoices

and i will let you know as soon as i hear from them

 

Many thanks to you.

BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt that sent statements. As mentioned, it is about to become SB, so they are desperate to see if they can get some money from you.

 

Make sure that in all correspondence you deny owing them any monies at all. If this drags out until April, that's the end of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure all correspondence with their solicitors is sent at least recorded signed for, we don't want them saying at the hearing that they haven't received such a request! require them to provide you with the full agreement, this must contain your signature, and all invoices pertaining to alleged debt

 

Leave them in no doubt that you require them to demonstrate legally that you are PERSONALLY liable for this alleged debt

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Diddydicky

thanks for yr posts - yes you are right on both. but i hv not seent he agreement nor do i remember agreeing to it. If they inserted this clause without my knowledge or if it was there at the time and i missed it....i hv no idea.

 

i have asked for all copies of agreement invoices etc.

 

My quesiton is as accountants, should they not announce that "...you are personally liable if the company folds/cease trading to pay our fees..."

just like when you take out a mortgage .. "your home may be at risk...etc.

 

anyway - will update when i receive all the copies.

 

thanks again diddydicky

all the best/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you need the agreement

 

also when i was a co director we had to sign the accountancy documents every year

 

it could well be that that agreement was valid only for the one years accounts

 

certainly you can do nothing other than an embarrassed defence until that document is provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a copy of my standard T&Cs (for want of a better phrase) from my accountant from years ago, never updated - I'm sure it's a template doc used widely in the industry. No mention of personal liability, as far as I can recall.

 

I'll dig it out in case it's of use - does any other Cagger who runs a business have a document from their accountant which, I think, sets out 'how we will conduct our business with you'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

 

1. I submitted my Acknowledgement of Service and requested "further and better particulars - did not hear from the plaintiff.

2. I then submitted my defence stating that I had no agreement with the palintiff

3. then i hear from the plaintiff himself stating that

 

a. when i signed the agreement - i agreed to act as guarantor should the company cease trading. I did not remember reading that para. i am kicking myself for this - if this is the case.

 

b. he said he would send me the agreement which i had signed.

c. he also said that he just wanted to "have closure" and does not mind even if i admitted to the debt and offer to pay £ 10 a month.

d. he said he would accept that proposal and review in a years time.

 

4. the Plaintiff has 28 days to reply to my defence.

 

I'd like to wait until i see the agreement before taking anyfurther action as - i guess the ball is now in their court.

 

any comments?

 

have a great weekend

thanks

BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi

 

A firm of accountants that used to work for me wants me to settle a bill issued 7 years ago on my company which went bust in 2003. They are issuing me with a writ. Is this possible? The worst part is i gave them a personal indemnity when i appointed them.

 

can they do this, if the invoice is dated just under 7 years ago. My other question is, is there a time limit on an indemnity? Many thanks BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are threatening to issue you with a writ I suggest they need to take some legal advice as what they really need to do is start proceedings in accordance with cpr 7 or 8.

Have you acknowledged the liability in writing (and if so was it signed) or by making any payment towards the liability within the period since the liability arose and if so when?

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rebel11

 

thanks for the information - so basically they have 6 years to make a claim, and not 7 - thats very interesting.

I dont remember all the details but i did say to them that i was not going to make payment to their invoice as they

messed up on my VAT returns.

 

They served me a writ and i pleaded not guilty. I also requested further and better particulars. on receipt i will have a better idea.

my problem is that i no loinger have all the documents relating to their work . Hopefully, i will remember more once i see the paperwork.

But now i am writing to you, i am reminded that i kept a back up of my the PC. I will try and find the drive over the weekend and check/

 

You mentioned CCJ's. What impact may they have? I do not have any .

(I did pick one up last week - but this was on another matter with another party. I am appealing to have it set aside.)

 

Many thanks/BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...