Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long will sky own the telephone line?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5131 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have cancelled my Sky Broadband and sky talk, due to the new changes taking place in their t&c's on the 29-03-2010. Although the changes are minimal, i saw the chance to be able to end my contract, before the 12 mont period.

I informed them and i received an email saying that i could leave them without penalty.

My contract ends on the 29-03-2010, the day their changes take place. However, they say it will take another ten days therafter, to disconnect completley.

I will be looking for a new provider of broadband and telephone and i am not bothered if it takes a while longer. However, when i call other companies to ask about their services, they say that Sky own the line and unfortunatley the cost could be anything from £69.00 to £160, that i would have to pay, the new provider, to take over the line.

 

My question is, how long does Sky own the Line?

I would have thought once my contract has ended, plus the 10 days that Sky say's it needs to disconnect everything, that the line would then become free again, so that i could perhaps take up an offer in the future, from a different provider, that may have offers to new customers.

 

Can anyone help with this question, i would be very grateful,

thank you, Shalaz.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What changes are taking place in the t&c's? I've not heard anything about this even though I'm a sky customer (though I did only sign up just over a month ago, so I might already be on the new t&c's to begin with)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a case of who owns the line as such.

 

The piece of wire from your house plugs into equipment at the exchange which in your case sounds like it's Sky's equipment.

 

All providers have to get [bT] Openreach to physically remove the wire from the previous provider's equipment and plug it into the new one.

 

Openreach can levy a charge for that which the new provider passes on to you. Or not, sometimes they subsidise it in order to gain you as a customer.

 

So in theory every time you change provider you'll incur a charge.

 

Unless your provider is not a true provider and simply reselling a BT service, and you're changing from BT - for instance, to the Post Office, in which case nothing need be unplugged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have cancelled my Sky Broadband and sky talk, due to the new changes taking place in their t&c's on the 29-03-2010. Although the changes are minimal, i saw the chance to be able to end my contract, before the 12 mont period.

I informed them and i received an email saying that i could leave them without penalty.

My contract ends on the 29-03-2010, the day their changes take place. However, they say it will take another ten days therafter, to disconnect completley.

I will be looking for a new provider of broadband and telephone and i am not bothered if it takes a while longer. However, when i call other companies to ask about their services, they say that Sky own the line and unfortunatley the cost could be anything from £69.00 to £160, that i would have to pay, the new provider, to take over the line.

 

My question is, how long does Sky own the Line?

I would have thought once my contract has ended, plus the 10 days that Sky say's it needs to disconnect everything, that the line would then become free again, so that i could perhaps take up an offer in the future, from a different provider, that may have offers to new customers.

 

Can anyone help with this question, i would be very grateful,

thank you, Shalaz.

This is one of the main problems with "unbundled" phone lines. Once they are unplugged from BT's equipment in the exchange and plugged into someone else's, other providers have problems sorting things out. BT will be able to return your line to them, but they will hold you to a minimum term. If you are in receipt of any of the applicable benefits, you could go on to BT Basic which is really good value (about £12.50 per quater!).

 

Here is some info on BT Basic! A simple guide to BT Basic - BT's Inclusive Communications Website

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maxxpower,

the changes that are taking place are in the Sky Broadband and Sky Talk subscription pakkages. They are very subtle, and take place on the 29th of this month.

 

The changes, i have been told, are very subtle.

 

Sky Broadband S.A. who provide you with sky broadband and talk services, will be replaced by, Brithish Sky Broadcasting Limited.

The other changes are to condition 7.5 of the Sky Talk Contract and condition 2(i) of the Sky Broadband contract. mainly about how they will notify you if they modify or temporarily suspend your services, if they need to carry out repairs etc.

I am afraid my scanner is not working, so i cant scan it in for you. However, a full set of the updated terms and conditions are available at:

sky.com/products or you can request a copy by post.

 

I used these small changes in my contract, to cancel my broadband and talk pakkage. Sky is too expensive for me now. My 12 month contract was due to end, at the end of june. I used their changes to my advantage, since it said, "if you are happy to accept these new terms, simply continue to pay your subscription, otherwise, if you no longer wish to receive Sky Talk and or Sky Broadband services, you must contact them at least 7 days before 29 March 2010.

 

I did receive my letter in January, perhaps they have not sent you one of these letters, or it is missing in the post. They have to send them to all customers, even you, Because the changes have not yet taken place

 

I called them and no one seemed to know much about any of it. But in the end i got there.

You have to call the cancellations department for Sky Broadband and Talk, explain that you do not accept the changes taking place on the 29-03-2010 and that should cancel out the contract.

I have received a letter confirming the cancellation for the 29th, with no penalty charges, since it is Sky who are changing the T&c's etc.

 

Shalaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

BT Basic 'good value'? I beg to differ. The tariff (Low User) worked out at £18.50pm Quarter around £6pm. Half that of BT 'Basic'. No doubt one of the reasons BT got rid of it.

 

BT basic is £13.50 per quater (not £12.50 as I previously posted) and includes £4.50 of calls in that. Thats only £4.50 per month, with £1.50 per month of calls.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

what you should have done is - for info in case others need it

 

request to opt out of the sky network and then 5 days later contact a new provider to transfer the line over and after 2 days call sky and say you are getting a new provider re the policy changes

 

you need to put this in process in the next 5 days for it too work out ;)

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
BT basic is £13.50 per quater (not £12.50 as I previously posted) and includes £4.50 of calls in that. Thats only £4.50 per month, with £1.50 per month of calls.

 

It might be good value....but its only available if you're jobless or a pensioner.

 

Am I eligable for BT Basic? - BT's Inclusive Communications Website

 

You can usually get BT Basic if you are claiming one of the benefits below:

  • Income Support
  • Income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance
  • Employment Support Allowance (Income related) or
  • Pensions Credit (Guaranteed Credit)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...