Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Liability Advice - Six Years Plus


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5201 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

I'll try and keep this short and to the point.

 

I was given a loan by someone in excess of ten years ago, which I defaulted on at least eight years ago.

 

During the time from then right up until now, I have had no contact from the person concerned, asking for repayment.

 

A simple open and shut case of 'statute barred'...

 

Or it would have been had I not, having decided to try and be honorable by way of contacting said creditor off my own back recently to ask for a balance of account and to offer payment.

 

Contact was made by way of an email account which doesn't bear my name, if that makes any difference...

 

The lender has now come back to me reeling off the terms of the loan and pointing out the part of the agreement which stated if I defaulted, they reserved the right to apply quite a high rate of compound interest from that date on until the loan was settled.

 

I understand from browsing the forums the limitation period is therefore now reset due to my effectively admitting the debt and offering some form of payment?

 

But then I've also read other literature than suggests that maybe the debt isn't legally enforceable should the person decide to try to pressurise me into paying quicker by way of court action etc, because it's over six years old.

 

Not paying is not an option - the reason this has dragged on for as long as it has is not all my fault (health issues etc), but I would like to know exactly where I stand in terms of being able to state 'I can afford X and X is what you will get until such times as my circumstances improve'.

 

Many thanks in advance for any advice given. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

so is this a person to person loan

or is it from a Co.

 

diff to totally understand if it is?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so is this a person to person loan

or is it from a Co.

 

diff to totally understand if it is?

 

dx

 

Hi

 

It's a 'person to person' loan with what looks like an agreement that's been drawn up using a template, that states the following amongst other things:

 

"This agreement shall be governed by English Law and both parties agree that any dispute shall be heard within the appropriate English Court."

 

Cheers

Edited by Uncle Peter
Link to post
Share on other sites

How much money is involved? What is the interest rate?

 

Are they licensed to lend money, if not I suspect it is unenforceable.

 

Hi

 

The original loan was for £1500, repayable in four instalments over period of just over two years.

 

I'm pretty sure I paid the first instalment of £270 but have no bank statements from the period concerned to back this up, so given the length of time that has lapsed since, I'm happy to work on the assumption this payment wasn't made and I therefore still owe the full amount.

 

The interest charged was at a rate of 7.5%, and according to a copy of the agreement they've now sent me (and which is not the signed original), equates to £142.50.

 

There is then a clause that states that the following:

 

"The lender reserves the right to impose interest charges at the rate of 7½% per month compounded on any outstanding balance if the borrower does not meet the final repayment date. The lender shall notify the borrower of this action in writing if he chooses to exercise his rights in this respect."

 

The final repayment date was January 2003, so as you can imagine, I'm rather concerned by the amount of interest the person could ask for should they decide to enforce this clause. :eek:

 

The last communication I had from them said they would let me know in due course whether they had decided to invoke the above clause or not.

 

The loan was from an acquaintance who isn't a registered money lender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry i have been busy.

 

as it is clearly making ref to 'english law', and thus std legal proceedures, thus it can quite be constroud as now being very statute barred.and NOTHING can unbar it. not even a court.

 

now, i would offer [as you indicate you wish to pay your just dues] the remainder of what you own [regardless to any subsequent interest £1500.

 

pers if they start to argue, quote statute barring , in the vain of i don't legally have to pay you anything, take it or leave it.

 

be clear, they have NO legal recourse on you & certainly it would never get to court.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry i have been busy.

 

Hey, no worries. :)

 

Many thanks for the advice.

 

I'm trying to keep things as pleasant as possible given I perhaps could have done more to sort the situation out sooner.

 

I'm not doubting what you say, but are you quite sure that 'statute barred' definitely applies, as I have approached the person off my own back, acknowledging the sum owed together with making an offer of payment.

 

I just want to make sure I get my facts straight before replying to their last email, as I suspect it is going to get nasty from their perspective, the moment I start 'dictating the pace', so to speak. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it applies

if a period of 6yrs has elapsed since last financial transaction in/out or the last time you SIGNED a letter specifically stating you owed the debt.....its statute barred, and once a debt is statute barred NOTHING [even you or a court] can do can unbar it.

 

the ONLY exception to this is if a CCJ has been granted within the 6yrs, then sadly it continues to run, but after 6yrs of no action on a CCJ, they must still go back to court to enforce it.

 

basically its this comment that sinks them:

"This agreement shall be governed by English Law and both parties agree that any dispute shall be heard within the appropriate English Court."

 

dx

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it applies

if a period of 6yrs has elapsed since last financial transaction in/out or the last time you SIGNED a letter specifically stating you owed the debt.....its statute barred, and once a debt is statute barred NOTHING [even you or a court] can do can unbar it.

 

the ONLY exception to this is if a CCJ has been granted within the 6yrs, then sadly it continues to run, but after 6yrs of no action on a CCJ, they must still go back to court to enforce it.

 

basically its this comment that sinks them:

"This agreement shall be governed by English Law and both parties agree that any dispute shall be heard within the appropriate English Court."

 

dx

 

Excellent.

 

I've been stressing myself out over this for the last week or so...

 

 

Ahhh... that's better. ;)

 

Many thanks once again for the advice. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just so you have a second opinion DX is totally right, once a debt is statue barred in accordance with the limitations Act 1980 it stays barred and nothing can unbarr it . . . if they wish to debate it then send the statue of limitations template and have no further contact. but your choice.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okey dokey.

 

I have just sent them an email stating (amongst other things), that I acknowledge the original totals due, as in £1642.50 including interest, and as a gesture of goodwill I am willing to round the final total due up to £1800, subject to us reaching an agreement.

 

I have also outlined my proposals for repayment and I have gone to great lengths to avoid mentioning the actual legal state of play as things stand, as I believe at this stage mentioning such things will only serve to inflame the person concerned and I'd rather we, (as expressed in the email concerned), reach a mutual agreement without things deteriating any more than they already have.

 

However... if the gloves end up off, yes... I shall use all of the above and tell them what to do for the whole amount. ;)

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...