frank galler - kubic investments ltd

[natasha123]

Which Police Force are dealing with the Frank Galler matter.

 

I know who is dealing with the rest.

 

Suffolk Police.

Edited March 6, 2010 by MARTIN3030
Personal identifiers removed

[rush1]

Hi all, well he did not turn up, I did, and found out that this man just lies and lies. I cannot , well i can understand that we all want to blame some one , natasha sorry not the one, she to has been taken in by mr FG. If you have been in the company of mr FG then you will undrestand, he is the best at what he does. This man has no money in this country, FACT. He may have money abroad , but not here. FG is the only one to blame. As i have said how many of us are there . 2500 as mr FG said x £2400 average person is what.................. But where is the money not here. FACT and i have the proof..........

[princess5]

caroline i have letter headed paper that you speak of and also with national finance headed, i have not recieved any of my files back for my loan either which iam concerned about as people who worked for frank now have my personal details and bank details!!

[Caroline2009]

In what way has she been taken in. Not true.

[Caroline2009]

caroline i have letter headed paper that you speak of and also with national finance headed, i have not recieved any of my files back for my loan either which iam concerned about as people who worked for frank now have my personal details and bank details!!

Thanks Princess, the police are wanting this information.

[Caroline2009]

Hi all, well he did not turn up, I did, and found out that this man just lies and lies. I cannot , well i can understand that we all want to blame some one , natasha sorry not the one, she to has been taken in by mr FG. If you have been in the company of mr FG then you will undrestand, he is the best at what he does. This man has no money in this country, FACT. He may have money abroad , but not here. FG is the only one to blame. As i have said how many of us are there . 2500 as mr FG said x £2400 average person is what.................. But where is the money not here. FACT and i have the proof..........

 

 

What do you mean in the company of him? He is an ugly little s...t.

I am only 5ft and he was not much taller than me. He would probably be on most women's totally unshaggable list.

He was not driving a micra when I met him but his car did not reflect any level of success. Because of his age he easily forgot what he had said previously and he would answer the same question with different answers. This always made me question in my mind what was going on.

 

The amount of time he spent in Spain always concerned me because he could fly off there to safety when matters became too hot for him.

 

For a normal woman, I would say he was not a charmer because his looks were so unattractive. I can see how some men can charm people into conning them but as I said he is an ugly little so and so. Sorry this is an objective fact.

[princess5]

ahhh i had a vision he looked like richard gere, damn it!

[rush1]

FACT, he has our money..... did have.

[princess5]

we wont get our money back FACT!

[princess5]

Will we have justice for FRANK who knows??

[rush1]

Well i hope we get both, only time will tell. from what i have seen here in england, not much chance. If the money is abroad in spain, or where ever, it would be nice to find it.

[princess5]

whos kevin jones as found this on on a notice of default and opportunity to cure letter sent to my bank?

Edited March 5, 2010 by princess5

[tinkers]

Hello Natasha

 

I am new to this forum and I have read through all of the posts, yours in particular and so I put the following to you like this;

You claim that you only worked with the CCA, but I believe this to be untrue, are you saying DID NOT use the Bill of Exchange act at all?

You said that due to not being able to get hold of and lack of payment, you had the worst Christmas ever, is it not true that there are pictures of you on a social networking site on holiday in January of this year?

You claimed that you do not want to take any more money from anyone, yet in a post by another user, they said that you would be willing to negotiate their claim but they would need to pay £200, a slight contradiction don't you think?

You stated in an earlier post that you have never used another company's name unlawfully; again I have the incentive to disbelieve you!

You noted on one of your posts that you sometimes were paid as little as £16 per card which then went to £50, didn't you later say that you were receiving £200 per case, how is there such a wide gap between figures, surely you knew what you were being paid?

 

How do you know that Kubic were not negotiating payments, apart from the disappearance of Mr Galler, what exactly has Kubic got away with?

You say in another post that obtaining an MOJ licence is "not" a difficult task, but is it not true that you and you previous company (Tate-Lloyd Legal Services LLP, which is listed as still active with Companies House but is not registered to Metropole Chambers) had its application rejected?

I suggest that this is possibly why you were using names of company's which did not belong to you but had MOJ licences granted to them?

You say that you did not personally send out any paperwork for clients to fill out - did you not send out Affidavits to be signed, sworn by a solicitor and sent back to you?

You mention that the problem with Tate-Lloyd was that the company was not licensed; I thought you said that it was not difficult to get a licence and if Tate-Lloyd were told to stop trading, why are you still listed as an active company with Companies House and not as a dissolved company?

You claimed Frank was already there, when you joined the company and that you were there for only 2 months. Surely you were there longer?

I assume that the reason as to why Frank's new girl doesn't answer her telephone is because she saw what was going on and decided to get out of the situation that she had been put in, before she got dragged in any further and also it could be because she probably doesn't want to talk to you and have to listen to any of your nonsense?

You say that you will try and get in contact with Jessica, how do you propose to do this?

 

Were you directly involved with her meetings with Frank in order to suggest that you be a witness for her, what is the truth behind this?

You say that Frank is not responsible for the system that was used, in that case who is responsible, weren't you working for him?

I would like to point out that if you were doing things wrong, the police are not likely to tell you in a letter, they would monitor your activity in order to obtain any relevant facts that they require!![/font

If you have resigned from doing any work associated with Kubic, surely you are no longer in a position to give updates on cases or have the need to have any communications with people that you are no longer involved with?

 

Why, if you wanted to show that you were no longer associated or working for Kubic Investments, did you use another company's name?

 

What would you achieve other than unnecessary confusion for clients of which you were trusted (along with Frank) to handle cases for?

If you were no longer working (if you ever were) for Kubic investments did you not just say so, maybe there wouldn't be so much resentment and anger if there had been honesty from the beginning?

It strikes me as amazing as to how Finance Angles and National Finance to which I both have letters, states clearly that correspondence be sent to Metropole Chambers in Swansea and uses the same telephone contact details as Tate-Lloyd once did also, when National Finance isn't a registered company and Finance Angels is registered to Newcastle, can you elaborate on this?

 

Was anybody aware that Frank isn't even British as well, he is in fact Hungarian!!

You said and I quote - I want to make clear I can support everything that I am saying in this forum"

In my opinion Natasha, your contradictions are visible for all to see, it would be suggested given the rising anger among disgruntled clients that you tell us the truth for here on in!!

Edited March 6, 2010 by tinkers

[princess5]

this seems to be a very interesting link hmmmm

welcome tinkers thankyou for joining, im sure everyone will be interested seeing the answers to these questions.

[princess5]

Originally Posted by natasha123

I am a bit angry with martin now, as I really try hard with this, there is no need to post this to stir up things, it is almost like a talk show were the talkmaster provokes to mess up things on purpose.

 

Anyway I am sorting a fom out which i will email to you, I just need your email address.

 

I had no intention to ignore you, but i find it hard to keep track of things.

 

I will email you them from my other email account.

 

Kind regards

Natasha

[J1803]

Yes some interesting questions there, pity it has posted the way that it has!

[Caroline2009]

Well done Tinkers!

One matter of great amusement to all, when Natasha finally accepted that the Bill Of Exchange Act route was not working she started the cca route using letter templates from this site!!

 

She thought she was going to be as big as Cartel. I have an email stating such.

 

Natasha is responsible for most of the issues faced here. Frank, however, should have realised she was well out of her depth and she did not have the intelligence or integrity to admit such. Most likely because living in Swansea jobs are difficult to find and in law an impeccable career history is essential.

 

Most people posting on here have had issues with the loans and credit cards which Natasha dealt with. The mortgages are another matter and were routed elsewhere. No idea where although I know many contacts in the industry would not touch Frank, I made sure of it not because I had dealings with him but because I failed to understand why he continued to get Natasha to do the legal paperwork when she was not qualified to do so. It just did not make any sense at all.

 

It also concerned me that Natasha walked away from all the Claim Management Clients so easily.

 

If Frank had integrity why would he use someone useless and unqualified? I think he wanted to help her, no doubt but is still does not make any sense.

Could it be that law firms would not deal with him because they felt he was not squeaky clean?

It really does not add up.

 

Could it be that he was uncomforable using a law firm because further down the line he intended to do a runner with people's money.

This would make sense.

Edited March 6, 2010 by Caroline2009

[Caroline2009]

Another matter, if one is employed by a company as Natasha says she was she would be paid a salary not a per item fee.

 

Frank entrusted his clients to her.

[Caroline2009]

whos kevin jones as found this on on a notice of default and opportunity to cure letter sent to my bank?

 

Yes I wondered about that.

 

I think it is Natasha's son.

Strange though, because I also have a William Waters on some aswell.

Could he be Russell Water's son?

[rush1]

Mr Ferencz Laszio galler, this is his real name.......

[MARTIN3030]

Hello tinkers-welcome to the site.

You raise some interesting questions,lets hope Natasha will respond.

 

For the record,I think it not wise to be posting named officers from Suffolk Police,since we have not had this clarified as fact.

Until we are given such evidence to support it,those names will remain edited.

If it is the case that this officer IS requesting information,perhaps someone could give the team some proof of this.

[MARTIN3030]

Are we sure that Frank is Hungarian ?

I think the name is actually Romanian.

[Caroline2009]

Are we sure that Frank is Hungarian ?

I think the name is actually Romanian.

 

 

This becomes stranger by the day.

 

Natasha and Bianca Klinkmuller question raised on this site by another poster

Frank and whatever his name is?

 

How more bizarre can this get?

[Caroline2009]

Mr Ferencz Laszio galler, this is his real name.......

 

Companies House information does not reflect this I presume?

 

Do they not check out directors first?

[rush1]

Hi, Can i ask tinkers, what were you doing with my paper work, had you to had meetings wiyh FG. You had had these papers for 2 or 3 weeks, You returned them to natasha with nothing done, why... My wife and i rang the police and the officer came to my home , this was around the same time you had my paper work. We gave him the lot, he returned and in writing said nothing could be done, go down the route of the moj..