Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander - Link & GE Woodchester - HP issue


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4997 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Longtime lurker here looking for some help please.

 

I requested to VT my HP agreement that was taken out with GE in 2005. I wrote to Santander (as they had taken over GE) in August 2009 requesting HP and was sent the relevant paperwork.

I sent the form back right away and a cheque for the uplift within 21 days. After much to-ing and fro-ing back and forth I received a letter from Santander in December saying that I was not allowed to terminate due to arrears. I had arrears in September and was not advised of this. I must note that I have paid more than half of the Total Amount Payable as well as the amount the arrears come to. Now this evening I have received a call from Link Financial regarding this and threatening court action. Surely if I was not allowed to VT due to arrears this should have been pointed out when I first requested this course of action?

Any advice would be very gratefully received as this has been going on for the past 6 months and I am scared I will be taken to court.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Postgii will be able to help you out on this, as HP agreements are his thing.

 

And court is nothing to be scared of, they merely threaten this with the intent of scaring you witless and bending over backwards for them.

 

So don't be afraid of it, each time they mention court just nonchalantly reply, Um, yeah I'm free next Tuesday, will that be OK?

 

They are more afraid of courts than they let on believe me!

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reassurance! :)

 

I really do not want it to come to that. I am really annoyed with Santander as I have repeatedly requested that they honour the request to VT. Now, tonight, with no notification that they have sent the debt to a DCA I get a call from Link Financial! Are they allowed to do that?

I told the man on the phone to put everything in writing as I was not prepared to talk on the phone. The interesting thing is, he referred to GE Woodchester and not Santander :-?

 

Mrs C

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are all a law unto themselves ignoring all of the guidelines and really stretching the limits of consumer law.

 

You did the right thing by telling them you won't speak to them over the phone, that's the best way to deal with these eejits.

 

Keep everything in writing if they continue to ring then hang up.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little update on this situation. I received a letter today from Link claiming my debt has been assigned to them from Santander. I have no notification from Santander that this is the case.

Can they do this?

 

Also they have asked for payment within 14 days, actual quote is, within the following 14 days. Following what? I thought they had to have a specific date.

 

It was also interesting to note that the letter is dated 1st Feb 2010, but the assignment allegedly took place on 21st Jan 2010.

 

What is my next step to better resolve this? I do not want to shirk my debt I just want to exercise my right to VT the vehicle. I have definitely paid over half the amount owed.

Anyone?

 

Thanks in advance. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little update on this situation. I received a letter today from Link claiming my debt has been assigned to them from Santander. I have no notification from Santander that this is the case.

Can they do this?

Yes they will often do this, normaly with a letter from the first DCA saying that they have passed it onto XYZ.

 

Also they have asked for payment within 14 days, actual quote is, within the following 14 days. Following what? I thought they had to have a specific date.

 

It was also interesting to note that the letter is dated 1st Feb 2010, but the assignment allegedly took place on 21st Jan 2010.

 

What is my next step to better resolve this? I do not want to shirk my debt I just want to exercise my right to VT the vehicle. I have definitely paid over half the amount owed.

Anyone?

 

Thanks in advance. :)

 

I'll give Postgii an nudge see if he can help.

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tried to send Postgii a message, but his inbox? is full!

 

So I'm hoping he will see this and read it.

If you need urgent help then click on the red triangle........

 

 

 

 

 

.

.

.

.

.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

standard link threat, by the quote within the following 14 days means they want you to cough up the dosh asp,

 

did they cash the cheque you sent with the VT paperwork?

 

If yes then they have bound themselvs to that VT.

 

send link a short sharp reply saying that until the VT issue is resolved to a satisfactory degree then the account is in dispute and that you will have nothing to do with them.

 

Try this

 

Dear Cretins at link

 

This account entered into dispute when Santander offered a VT amount which was duly paid on date xx.

 

since then they have "Cashed the Cheque" if they have, so I consider this account closed. if santander dispute this then I will only deal with them and not some firm hired by them.

 

regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to both of you!

 

No they never cashed the cheque, they claimed not to have received it and so I sent another (both recorded delivery) which they also never cashed. It seems to me that they are trying to avoid allowing me to VT in the hope I'll give up! Am too annoyed now so that will NOT happen! LOL.

 

I'll send the letter telling them where to go and take it from there.

 

Again, both of you, thanks for the advice. :)

I'll keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did they sign for the recorded mail?

 

seems that someone jumped the gun at santander and they are desperatley trying to cover their arses.

 

maybe worth asking an independant advisor on any grounds for making them honour their side of this

Link to post
Share on other sites

did they sign for the recorded mail?

 

seems that someone jumped the gun at santander and they are desperatley trying to cover their arses.

 

I think you may have a point there.

 

maybe worth asking an independant advisor on any grounds for making them honour their side of this

 

I was considering writing to TS and OFT about this as Santander had agreed to the VT and then suddenly it was a no-go on the grounds of arrears, which incidentally where on the account BEFORE the VT request and were only on it due to their inability to reinstate my direct debit details again, despite having sent these details twice. Is there anyone other that TS or OFT you could suggest? I have searched online for the name of the main person at Santander but no joy.

I am sick to the back teeth of this whole situation!

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try citizensadvice, for starters failing that look in your local yellow pages for a solicitor or accountant that would look at your case for nothing in the first instance, then see what they say.

 

personally, I would also write to TS and the OFT and the FOS - the more the merrier, also sent a carbon copy to santander to keep them abreast of the situation, they dont like adverse publicity

Edited by PGH7447
my spelling is rubbish
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Little update on this situation.

 

Got my credit report from Experian the other day and was angered to find that Link had registered a default against me! Despite the fact they have never at any point in time sent out a default notice! What is the legal standpoint on this? Does anyone know? I am extremely angry to think that my credit rating will be ruined for 6 years all because of these ****.

 

Can a DCA register a default without telling you?:-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the original creditor, GE/Santander, ever register a default? Or send you a default notice?

 

Remmeber, registering a default is not the same as sending a default notice, but one certainly implies the other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

I would really appreciate some help with this isse, if anyone out there can advise me what to do next please?

 

To sum up the situation:

 

I asked to VT my HP agreement with the OC

 

They said I could not due to arrears (which i have since found out is incorrect).

 

They sent a DN which is invalid - it does not allow 14 days to remedy and has the charges added to the arrears figure.

 

They sent a termination letter which is, I believe, unlawful recission as the DN is invalid.

 

They sold the debt on, despite not answering my question about the arrears figure.

 

I have written numerous letters now to the OC pointing this out and quoting the relevant areas of law that are being breached to no avail. The original creditor just keeps replying and informing me it was sold to Link and I should deal with them.

 

I sent a SAR to Link to see what information they held on me and have noticed:

 

1. The default date is incorrect

2. The default is registerd with the CRA BEFORE the debt was assigned

3. The letter i got from Link stating the debt had been assigned was not from the OC, just Link claiming to have been assigned it

4. The £10 I sent to pay for the SAR has been credited to the account.

5. The letter which accompanied the SAR also informs me a £5 admin charge has been applied to my account. Why is this, when I sent £10 for the SAR?

 

What can I do next? I want the default removed from my account and am quite happy to now pay off my balance in full if this happens as my financial circumstances have improved. No one seems to want to listen!

 

Please help!

Edited by mrscollins
Link to post
Share on other sites

A little update:

 

I have decided to update TS, FOS and the OFT wrt the latest development in this on-going saga!

 

I intend to send them copies of the DN, NOA (if indeed it is a true NOA) termination notice and transcript of what Link sent as a response to my SAR request, along with my original complaint letter outlining where I believe the OC has breached the law and emphasising to them that I will be more than happy to settle the account if they remove the default.

 

Does anyone have any suggestions as to what else I should enclose? I'd really appreciate a steer on this?

 

Thanks,

Mrs C

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

A little update on this case.

 

I received a letter from the FOS stating that they believed the DN to be valid and the business has not acted unreasonably.

Very disappointed about this and feel compelled to write back and point out that it does not matter what they believe, facts are facts, the DN is invalid. I will reply and let the adjudicator know I wish it to go to the Ombudsman. Not holding out much hope at all. What is the point of having laws if they are not upheld?

 

If it is not upheld, what further recourse do I have after FOS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It won't hurt to correct the FOS and show them why the DN is faulty, and state the particular regs that have been ignored, with a little luck they might actually read your complaint and redress the situation in your favour.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for answering Bazooka Boo.

 

I will reply to the FOS and point out exactly which consumer laws are being breached. What really irritates me is that I already provided all of this information to them, pointing out exactly how the DN is invalid and the response was along the lines of..."I believe the business acted reasonably and fairly..." and "I believe the DN is valid..."

Stunning in its audacity really.

 

What chance do you have if you point out the law is breached and the Ombudsman merely shrugs his shoulders at it!?

If it is not upheld I definitely want to take this further, where would I go after FOS? Who is higher? Who holds them to account?

Edited by mrscollins
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

The point isn't whether they acted "Reasonably & fairly" it's whether they acted lawfully and within the guidelines laid down.

 

I have no idea who polices the FOS, but I would use and exhaust their own complaints procedure first.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...