Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have been in the motor trade for 35 years and have used hundreds of companies for a variety of repairs, only once have i had a major problem which i sorted out in County Court and won. I had a Vauxhall Insignia with an engine fault and advertised on 1st Choice car repairs site for a repair.  Jack, actually his alias Lee contacted us with a quote which we accepted. We transported the car to Unit 4/18 Burnt Mills Road North Benfleet SS129JX expecting its return within the promised 28 days. I have had every excuse you could possibly imagine, in the last 2 YEARS!! as to why the car is not repaired. Ecu faults, Ignition faults, Gearbox faults, Exhaust faults, Wiring chaffing faults, Communication faults, Cancer treatment delaying the repair, medical treatment in Turkey delaying the repair, Covid delaying the repair!! The man is a pathological liar and a fraud. He is now refusing to tell me where the car is and refusing me access to collect it. He is under investigation by trading standards dept Jasper Singh officer in the case but he just keeps getting away with it. Police say its a civil debt and not a criminal offence. 1st choice do not want to know, they refuse to do anything other than request the car be repaired directly by UK169 which is of course ignored I found recently all the posts on this site about Jack and his tactics but it was too late. To date i am £6200 out of pocket to this man and it appears the law is powerless to deal with dishonest rogues.
    • The missing parcel is Evri uk , it was going from Shropshire to Cornwall and has gone missing.   but it got me wondering as i also sent a parcel abroad the same day if that had gone missing where would i stand ...    
    • Another farce kicking everything into the long grass - as usual for these corporate and political criminals Post Office scandal: Police to deploy 80 detectives for criminal inquiry. Investigation will dig into potential perjury offences and perverting the course of justice by senior leaders and Fujitsu   Police have asked government for a special grant of at least £6.75m to fund the operation. Police will not seek charging decisions, that is send files of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service, until after the public inquiry into the Post Office scandal concludes, which is expected in autumn 2025.   It is expected the CPS will not reach charging decisions until 2026, and the wait for any criminal trials could be even longer.     Post Office scandal: Police to deploy 80 detectives for criminal inquiry | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Investigation will dig into potential perjury offences and perverting the course of justice by senior leaders and Fujitsu    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disabled Parking and Supermarkets


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5223 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having said that, the blue badge scheme is widely abused. While waiting in a supermarket car park last weekend for the OH to emerge I saw four cars parked in disabled spaces in quick succession. All were displaying blue badges but none of the occupants - some of whom ran into the store - were visibly disabled in anyway.

 

You're not kidding there, it's getting ridiculous now. I end up queuing for a space while watching people literally sprinting to and from their cars :mad:Unless they are prepred to police the spaces by ctually checking that the genuine badge holder is actually present in the car, then this idea is just going to make things even worse :( :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You're not kidding there, it's getting ridiculous now. I end up queuing for a space while watching people literally sprinting to and from their cars :mad:Unless they are prepred to police the spaces by ctually checking that the genuine badge holder is actually present in the car, then this idea is just going to make things even worse :( :(

 

It's a very difficult area to monitor. Misuse of a Blue Badge is one thing (ie someone other than the Badge holder using it) and is a criminal offence. You can see the problems with getting that through court, without a police officer on the spot. Another issue is fraudulent aquisition of a Blue Badge, which again is very difficult indeed to tackle.

 

In either case, reporting the matter to the Blue Badge issuer is probably best (if you have the time and inclination to note the badge number and issuing authority). They can, at least, warn the BB holder that they could lose the Badge if it continues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In either case, reporting the matter to the Blue Badge issuer is probably best (if you have the time and inclination to note the badge number and issuing authority). They can, at least, warn the BB holder that they could lose the Badge if it continues.

 

As we are discussing the use of a BB on a private car park, where the BB has no legal standing in the first place, it is arguable as to whether this could constitute misuse of the badge in the first place. I think not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As we are discussing the use of a BB on a private car park, where the BB has no legal standing in the first place, it is arguable as to whether this could constitute misuse of the badge in the first place. I think not.

 

It is actually an offence to display the badge in the vehicle on any highway or other road to which the public have access, unless its being used properly by the holder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Supermarket Car Park cannot be classed as a Private Car Park as these car parks are open to public use and as such are classed as public roads and therefore are governed by the Road Traffic Act 1988. "

 

So if they are covered by the RTA. BB's are legal on them.

 

The road user and the law : Directgov - Travel and transport

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Supermarket Car Park cannot be classed as a Private Car Park as these car parks are open to public use and as such are classed as public roads and therefore are governed by the Road Traffic Act 1988. "

 

So if they are covered by the RTA. BB's are legal on them.

 

The road user and the law : Directgov - Travel and transport

 

You can get prosecuted for using one if you are not entitled, but you cannot be prosecuted for not using one ie in a disabled bay if its not covered by a traffic order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where the scheme does not apply

 

The Blue Badge Scheme does not apply to off-street car parks, private roads and at most airports.

 

About the Blue Badge Scheme

 

The scheme does not apply ie you cannot park free but its still a criminal offence to abuse one on a road as defined by the RTA 1988.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a pity the blue badge scheme and clamping would not apply to low life such as this

sprinted from the van into Homebase

 

Most people are creatures of habit and behave the same regardless of the location so they will probably get caught behaving as stupidly on-street. Unfortunatly the downside of sites such as this preaching that 'private' car parks are virtually unenforceable is that it doesn't only benefit those that make honest mistakes it also allows those that want to abuse the free parking and disabled bays to take the moral high ground in defending their behaviour and probably encourages it to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is people take advantage of one another, as in my previous post I work for Tesco and see all kinds of bad behaviour taking place on our car park. Such as parents with toddlers and babies parked in disabled bays because the disabled have used the mother chlld parking facilities and vice versa. To be honest some of the disabled act in ways i find disgusting just because they have a blue badge they feel it allows them to take away the rights of others. And before I get shot down for my comments I see it from all sides as I work at a busy supermarket, have a blue badge for my son who is disabled and have a young child in nursery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is actually an offence to display the badge in the vehicle on any highway or other road to which the public have access, unless its being used properly by the holder.

But the moment the supermarket have a barrier or controlled parking it is no longer open to the public therefore becomes private and the blue badge etc counts for nothing. BTW I am a blue badge holder and if I cannot get parking in the designated disbaled bay I will use a mother & child bay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree entirely with the comments about widespread abuse of the BB scheme. My wife has severe walking difficulties and she prefers not to use a wheelchair because she values her independance, what she has left of it.

Its just a pity that so many people abuse a system that is designed to help those less fortunate than ourselves.

I wonder if they would be so like minded if their family members were affected by the abusers.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree entirely with the comments about widespread abuse of the BB scheme. My wife has severe walking difficulties and she prefers not to use a wheelchair because she values her independance, what she has left of it.

Its just a pity that so many people abuse a system that is designed to help those less fortunate than ourselves.

I wonder if they would be so like minded if their family members were affected by the abusers.

 

I agree, I have a son who is in need of an aortic valve replacement which means he cannot walk even small distances before being short of breath. When I have him with me if there is space I use the blue badge in a disabled bay I would never use a parent and child bay as that would remove the right of someone like myself who has a baby or toddler, I would prefer to park in a quiet part of the car park and use his wheelchair.

 

When I'm alone I have never used his blue badge as all I'm doing really is disadvantaging my son when he is with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the moment the supermarket have a barrier or controlled parking it is no longer open to the public therefore becomes private and the blue badge etc counts for nothing. BTW I am a blue badge holder and if I cannot get parking in the designated disbaled bay I will use a mother & child bay.

 

The imposition of controls or barrier are not relevant if the 'road' has public access. I have succesfully prosecuted several drivers for Blue Badge abuse in Council car parks which are controlled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if they would be so like minded if their family members were affected by the abusers.

 

This is what I find particularly annoying - I'm certain that the vast majority of abusers are using a family member's BB, rather than a forged or stolen one. So they really ought to have some awareness of the problems it causes for disabled people.

 

Before I became disabled myself, I can honestly say with my hand on my heart, that I never parked in a disabled bay in 30 years of driving. I would have considered myself a sociopath to have even contemplated doing so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Th

I can honestly say with my hand on my heart, that I never parked in a disabled bay in 30 years of driving. I would have considered myself a sociopath to have even contemplated doing so.

 

Same here, i find it even more annoying when i have to drop my wife at a door entrance when i have to go and look for somewhere to park and then of course come back and pick her up and the shopping.

I often get abuse off other drivers because i am blocking their path, you just cant win.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The imposition of controls or barrier are not relevant if the 'road' has public access. I have succesfully prosecuted several drivers for Blue Badge abuse in Council car parks which are controlled.

I thought the thread was about parking on a super market car park and not council car parks. I am not disoputing your stance on council car parks as people should know better and read the manual they got with the blue badge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I sympathise the problems are often caused by poor or lazy car park design. In the case of my local Tescos the disabled area extends to over 40 bays and has been plonked in what is effectively an island in the middle of the car park immediately alongside the main vehicular access. This means that all of the occupants have to negotiate traffic - once out of their vehicles - to get access to the store. In all the weekly visits we've made I have never seen the area more than a third full - and I'm being generous. So why all the extra spaces?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When we use the Morrisons Car Park in Kendal we can always find a Bay they seem to have more considerate drivers there, sadly ASDA is not so fortunate. People use their spaces to nip into Focus next door who have their own Car Park.

Edited by boswell
missing text

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the thread was about parking on a super market car park and not council car parks. I am not disoputing your stance on council car parks as people should know better and read the manual they got with the blue badge.

 

It is but the question was raised about the validity of using blue badges in Car Parks. It doesn't matter if the car park is owned by the Council or a supermarket if it has public access it is a criminal offence to use or even display the badge other than for the use of the holder. The offence/contravention of not displaying a blue badge in a bay is another different matter and is only enforceable in a bay with a traffic order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is people take advantage of one another, as in my previous post I work for Tesco and see all kinds of bad behaviour taking place on our car park. Such as parents with toddlers and babies parked in disabled bays because the disabled have used the mother chlld parking facilities and vice versa. To be honest some of the disabled act in ways i find disgusting just because they have a blue badge they feel it allows them to take away the rights of others. And before I get shot down for my comments I see it from all sides as I work at a busy supermarket, have a blue badge for my son who is disabled and have a young child in nursery.
The difference (putting aside the private/non-private part for now, it's not the point I'm making) is that a BB indicates a necessity, and BB holders can in fact park in places not allowed to others, whilst parents & child is merely a case of convenience. Huge difference. And if there is no disabled space left, damn right I will use a p&c one, mainly because I don't think that other motorists would be too impressed by my car door denting theirs as I struggle to get out of my car. I NEED the extra space on the side of me and the regular spaces are simply not wide enough.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I sympathise the problems are often caused by poor or lazy car park design. In the case of my local Tescos the disabled area extends to over 40 bays and has been plonked in what is effectively an island in the middle of the car park immediately alongside the main vehicular access. This means that all of the occupants have to negotiate traffic - once out of their vehicles - to get access to the store. In all the weekly visits we've made I have never seen the area more than a third full - and I'm being generous. So why all the extra spaces?

 

Write to them. It's quite possible they installed the bays with the best of intentions, but don't have a process to monitor how effectively they are used, and don't realise the situation. One thing I will say for Tesco and the like, they do seem to bend over backwards to help their customers, whether its packing your bag for you or letting you return a DVD after you've watched it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...