Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting. Thanks for that London.  That’s what I’m gathering.     iv no doubt they would send me fake documents but would they really dare present fake documents to a court of law?
    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Hitachi Capital Finance) Discussions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3921 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi everyone ive just been reading the FAQ'S on the pkf website and saw this section.

5. What about the Hitachi Students and the Cash Students?

Unfortunately, it does not appear that the buyers will be in a position to complete the training

requirements of the Hitachi Students and the Cash Students.

If, on completion of the sales to the buyers, this ultimately becomes that the case, these students will be

advised accordingly.

The buyers may ultimately be in a position to complete the training requirements of the Hitachi Students

and the Cash Students, but this is likely to be at the expense of the Hitachi Student or the Cash Student.

 

am i right in thinking this is because they have nothing to gain from us??? the reason barclays are insisting on a new provider for their students is because they are charging an extortionate rate and stand to make a great profit from them! am i right in thinking this?:confused:

 

Hi

I am a Barclays financed advent student I was reading your thread.. my loan was taken out just before Christmas 2009 I never got a chance to get any training I was abroad and decided to start when I got back mid January.

I thought you should know my loan was for over three years at 0% interest... I am aware that others did not get such terms and have high interest payments :( .

 

I never received information from Barclays in January.. and the email from Advent went into my spam box, my first communication from Barclays was just over a week ago.

But I never the less was aware of what was going on due to seeing the articules on the news media.

I had first contacted Barclays end of January and the guy was helpful enough told me what he knew told me that they would have something to tell me in about a month and that Barclays had over 6,000 students with the same problem as me (all advent sudents??).

 

so I waited and got nothing so I called again and got an irritated young lady who was short with me and could tell me nothing except that it was not Barclays fault Advent went bust, according to her they heard about it at the same time we did, I did manage to get her to freeze my account.

Not that it worked they still took out money in March so I had to call them to give it back.

 

the past few days have been reading we are to be pushed at computeach.

I have been a student with them before, long time back.

I dont think they will have changed much, they have internal exams and have a high pass mark.. at the time when I took mine the questions were not multiple choice and were vague and could have answers depending on your interpretation of the question, that way they kept the students back by failing them repeatedly with the same exam paper until enough had moved forward to keep their training days booked with more bodies at least that what we noticed, so expect a longer than usual training time on each module.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had first contacted Barclays end of January and the guy was helpful enough told me what he knew told me that they would have something to tell me in about a month and that Barclays had over 6,000 students with the same problem as me (all advent sudents??).

 

A number of companies closed up shop when BPF withdrew finance facilities including Red Driver Training.

 

Have you nt seen this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/students/244467-advent-computer-training-barclays-85.html

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

A number of companies closed up shop when BPF withdrew finance facilities including Red Driver Training.

 

Have you nt seen this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/students/244467-advent-computer-training-barclays-85.html

 

David

 

Yes.. I was answering the guy with my post about high interest charges from barclays

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone knows how much time they've got, to pay monies back if i would accept their offer?

 

Hi lewandot I was given 10 days to accept my offer. So I think if u accept they'll prob give the old 14 days trick just to keep u hanging on! I have not accepted mine and I am a bit worried they might try and force another provider now!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can't force you to take another provider, i think i could probably fight for more, but i'm tired ... i think i'll take it - better than nothing, and it will give me enough money to finish course myself

 

yeah i understand where your coming from its gettin on my nerves now!

the thing is they claim i have done more than i actually have and they are planning on offering me 770 back thus charging me 1980 for 2 books, no exams and no workshops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can't force you to take another provider, i think i could probably fight for more, but i'm tired ... i think i'll take it - better than nothing, and it will give me enough money to finish course myself

Please PM me before you make any decisions. You may be interested in some information I have.

 

Everyone: My offer of information is still open. You are warmly invited to contact me for further details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As with any situation like this, accepting the first offer because it is something and not being bothered to fight for more is what all companies hope for in this situation. They know that they are required to pay up hence why they 'accept their obligations' under their contracts. Seeing as they have already made an offer they cannot turn that around now and change their minds, you all have it in writing. It sounds like a long path to go down and the chances are they will suddenly pay up when they realise people are willing to go to court as it would only cost them more overall. Fight it and get back what you rightly deserve, however if you beleive the offer you have got is fair then take it, just please nobody here take it then notice you could have ended up with 2k rather than 500 for the sake of a few extra letters and a month or 2 of waiting and only to regret in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I've been on the Barclays Partner Finance thread and you'll have heard BPF have replaced Advent with Computeach God help us!!

What I would like to know if someone could oblige to help us, did you all threaten Hitachi in letters, or S75 cca or do you know why they are offering refunds did they explain anything to you. We are trying to find if we can fight this in court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Willum could you please pm me with the info that you speak of.

If my pm box is full - send it to site team via red triangle.

 

Thanks

 

Martin

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bluedo,

I myself simply wrote a letter stating that I sought a refund with reference to S75 of the CCA 1974. In due course they replied stating that they accept their obligations under the act and offered me a refund. Needless to say the offer was not great hence why I am still fighting for my full refund the same as everyone else. Sorry I can't recommend something that can get the ball rolling with BPF.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Gaz For reply

That's interesting that they say they were accepting their obligations under the cca. And they feel obligated must mean maybe BPF should also be obligated to refund.

Now I'm wondering if BPF can be made to do the same.Except they've came up with this Computeach and they think that's them fulfilling their obligations.

 

We've all done the same as you guys, sent letters quoting S75 cca and frustrated contract 1943 got that from a lawyer nothings worked. Don't want to accept Computeach as that's out the frying pan into the fire.

Good Luck to you all here hope you get good offers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Gaz For reply

That's interesting that they say they were accepting their obligations under the cca. And they feel obligated must mean maybe BPF should also be obligated to refund.

Now I'm wondering if BPF can be made to do the same.Except they've came up with this Computeach and they think that's them fulfilling their obligations.

 

We've all done the same as you guys, sent letters quoting S75 cca and frustrated contract 1943 got that from a lawyer nothings worked. Don't want to accept Computeach as that's out the frying pan into the fire.

Good Luck to you all here hope you get good offers

 

 

Hi Bluedo,

 

Im guessing the main difference is Hitachi have nothing to gain as it is interest free and that most of us have probably progressed further/paid more and been on the course longer than the BPF guys - making it not viable to go with another provider.

 

Hitachi seem to be willing to write off around 50% for most people (around 2000) whereas BPF will lost several times that. There are also a LOT less people on Hitachi than BPF as evidenced by the size of both threads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bluedo,

 

Im guessing the main difference is Hitachi have nothing to gain as it is interest free and that most of us have probably progressed further/paid more and been on the course longer than the BPF guys - making it not viable to go with another provider.

 

Hitachi seem to be willing to write off around 50% for most people (around 2000) whereas BPF will lost several times that. There are also a LOT less people on Hitachi than BPF as evidenced by the size of both threads.

 

Thanks David for explaining that. Good Luck with your refunds. We'll keep trying to find something to help us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

My 8 weeks of waiting for my complaint to be resolved is almost up as of this coming Friday. If i haven't received a satisfactory resolve by then I will be taking it to the FO our complaints procedure and how to complain

 

I will let you know on my progress.

 

Fight the Power! Stand your ground! The customer is always right especially under the S75 CCA!

 

Peace

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received an email from Computeach stating that have my details. They're requesting that i verify my enrollment which is BS. I did not sign with computeach so i am now raising my complaint to the FO.

 

Will let you know what happens next

Link to post
Share on other sites

Willum do you think that the email is just a mass sent 1? meaning every1 who had training with advents has had their details sent to computeach? it says on the PKF website that the new provider is not going to be taking on the HCF or cash students?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with BPF, but I think that Computeach have got access to the whole database of ADvent students, hence why you have all got emails too. I'm pretty sure that if you "verified", they would then send you the "financial outlay" required to finish the course.

 

But DON'T verify yourself to them, as this is an indication that you accept Computeach and may endanger any chance of a refund.

 

If anyone wants to know what exams to take to get certified and what books to buy, PM me and i'll let you know - my employer is an MS Gold partner so we have access to a lot of training material that I can recommend :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on the course for 15 months and not even passed the A+ essentials yet. I have paid so far £2400 to Hitachi capital and i have got an offer back of £1240. Its a rip-of but im just gonna take it and carry on with my studies by myself. cant be bothered holding out for another few months just to get another £400 quid off them or something like that.

 

God luck to everyone else :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on the course for 15 months and not even passed the A+ essentials yet. I have paid so far £2400 to Hitachi capital and i have got an offer back of £1240. Its a rip-of but im just gonna take it and carry on with my studies by myself. cant be bothered holding out for another few months just to get another £400 quid off them or something like that.

 

God luck to everyone else :)

 

mate thats just under a 50% refund?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...