Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So if I've understood correctly, you had a meeting with a company who employ PPM to manage their car park, but PPM gave you a ticket and the company refuse to get it cancelled.  Eh???!!! You are being somewhat secretive with the details and it would help us to give correct advice if you would be crystal clear about the story.  Who did you have the meeting with?  What is their address?  Why do you think it was them who called in PPM?  Were you informed about the matter of the permit by this company?  Etc.
    • What a disgraceful shirking of responsibility.  Par for the course though I'm afraid with Iceland. You could get nasty and send them a version of the below (you know the local area so change what needs to be changed). Unfortunately the people who are replying are having to comply with the company policy which is being foisted on them - which is not to cancel tickets. But you might as well send the mail and try.   Dear Cissy, thank you for today's mail. Of course you are "able" to cancel the charge, you simply contact Excel and tell them to cancel the charge. I will wait for exactly 24 hours and then contact the local newspaper XXXXX and the local radio station XXXXX about Iceland's disgraceful disability discrimination.  Nothing much happens in Gravesend so I'm sure both will be happy to do a piece which will generate terrible publicity for your store and drive away customers, which is exactly what you deserve. Yours, XXXXX 
    • You are absolutely right to be cautious. It would be helpful if you will be prepared to send me a private message containing details of the outlet and the address et cetera. It might help me to get things more into perspective. So I understand that you had a business selling your husband's photographs. You were unable to continue your direct involvement and so you made an arrangement with a manager who you trusted to carry on the business for you while you were recovering elsewhere in the country. Is this correct? This manager has possession of all the files of your husband's photographs. Is this correct? Do you have any copies of the files? You made a reference to having a Co-op. Does that mean that you are running a Co-op supermarket or groceries outlet? I don't quite understand here. In terms of the possibility of continuing the arrangement with this manager – my own view is that you need to bring the arrangement to an end and I don't see how you could trust them. As far as I can see you are asking about two issues. Making sure that the files in the manager's position are destroyed so that you regain control of the photographs. Obtaining some damages for the loss of revenue. How many photographs do you believe are in his possession? What you estimate is your loss of revenue so far – probably calculated on your average revenue over, say, the five years before you stopped your involvement in the business? You are talking here not only about a breach of contract. You are talking also about breach of copyright and frankly you're also talking about deliberate copyright infringement – which is a criminal offence. Also fraud. Additionally, if you begin the dispute with this person, I would say that they will probably leave immediately. Have you got somebody else to run the business or would that be the moment that the whole thing collapses? If it is the latter, then this is something else that you need to prepare – somebody to take over as seamlessly as possible   Also, do you know the address of this person – and do they own their own home or any other assets?  
    • Just as i thought (from above post) : i just hope this is not the normal customer service that say they cant do anything and that you have to appeal to excel parking 🙄 this is the response my friend has received today - totally ignoring the subject which was: 'victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents' does anyone have any ideas to reply with please?     Thank you for your response.   I would like to apologise for the error in the previous email; our CEO, Tarsem Dhaliwal had received your email and tasked ourselves in the Executive Resolution Team with looking into this.   We have raised this with our internal property department who have more information on parking charges and any appeals, we can see that you had appealed the PCN with excel which was rejected, you then appealed the PCN with IAS which was also rejected.   Because of this, we would not be able to cancel or refund the charge.    I understand this may not be the outcome you had hoped for, I am sorry for any inconvenience caused.   Kind regards, Cissy
    • Officials at the Federal Reserve are expected to hold off on any interest rate cuts this month.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)Info and discussion thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:lol: Bet you're right there, Turfs! And a reminder sticker on it saying 'give no straight answer'.

 

If anyone is interested, here's the letter I sent to MD Paul Noble back in April.....

 

"Re; Refund of my course fees from Barclays Partner Finance linked loan.

 

Dear Mr Noble

 

Following the collapse of Advent Computer Training, with which I was signed up to do a Master CIW Designer course, I have written several times to Barclays Partner Finance Customer Relations regarding a refund of my £4,950 course fees (paid for with a linked loan from Barclays PF).

 

This remains unresolved and I have only received mass-mail replies, the last of which was frankly insulting to my intelligence. I attach, for your information, the last response from your supposed ‘relations’ team and my last letter, dated 31 March, in response.

 

Computeach is NOT a suitable provider by any stretch of the imagination for all my listed reasons in the letter to Ms Thompson.

 

• They do not provide the course options I signed up for with Advent.

• They do not provide unlimited attempts at the exams with no extra charge.

• They do not allow extended ‘flexible & at your own pace’ study – if you don’t complete the course within 12 months you PAY more. This was not the deal with Advent which was one flat fee, regardless of how long it took to complete.

• Their exams are only taken in Dudley, not at any local exam centre as Advent promised, using a voucher system.

• There is no dedicated recruitment team, as Advent promised, sourcing work placements within a 10 mile radius of my home.

• They provide atrocious service and have been found wanting by Dudley Trading Standards, the Financial Ombudsman and their own students who are currently taking legal action against them!

 

I signed for a course with Advent and they no longer exist. I did not sign a contract with anyone else, nor does my loan agreement give Barclays permission to fob me off onto a course with any other provider against my better judgement.

 

There has been a clear Breach of Contract under S75 of the Consumer Credit Act, as I have been without any service provision since 27 January 2010. You are therefore obliged to refund me for a course which I have not, and am not, receiving.

 

As Computeach charge several thousands pounds less on average for their courses than Advent did, may I ask why Barclays expect all the ex students to now go along with a course that costs less to start with than the £4,950 average paid to Advent? Who is benefitting from this difference in fees and pocketing the money?

 

I am writing to you to alert you to this situation and hope you will now act on these complaints by myself and over 2,000 other ex-Advent students. We do NOT want to be palmed off onto Computeach in order for Barclays to be able to wash its hands of us and sanctimoniously say it has provided its customers with a training course that is claimed (laughably) to be ‘of equivalent if not better standard’ when it is clearly not!

 

As you will see, I asked Ms Thompson for a response within 14 days of my letter to her.

My complaint is lodged with the Financial Ombudsman and Bristol Trading Standards, who I understand are also writing to you regarding my complaint.

 

I hope this will be resolved before I am obliged to take further legal action."

 

Here's his reply to Bristol Trading Standards, who also wrote on my behalf.

 

 

All duly noted and copied to the Financial Ombudsman, thanks Mr Noble - you're lookin' good on paper, guy!:p

 

"Our aim is to resolve all complaints internally...."

Well, they're doing a good job there then!!!

 

 

 

Hi Fuzzbutt,

I read this today on my lunch break and then low and behold I received a letter from Barclays after work as I was reading it, I thought to myself gee this sounds very familiar. I have received the same letter and where they have referred to yourself by name they have just replaced it with 'you'.

I have signed up to the legal representation you are organising and thought it might be of note that I send this through as further evidence Barclays don't care, they don't read or investigate our complaints and couldn't even have the manners to refer to me in the first person

The thing that makes me even more concerned is they clearly haven't even investigated my case as it states ''you continue to have obligations under the terms of the loan, including making repayments'' thing is I obtained a third party loan via another lender to pay the loan before the interest kicked in, so I don't owe Barclays a penny but they are so up themselves, they must assume I owe them for something.

Let me know if you think a copy of my letter, with their reply, the letter I received today and the letter confirming my debt with them is clear

 

Also mine was signed by Customer Relations Department and not Mr Noble interesting???????

 

Rgds

Skinnypinz

Edited by the_shadow
Removal of quoted attachments
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

New petitions and signing petitions were closed because of the election, and now they have a message up saying "The new administration is currently assessing how best to proceed with the e-petitions service. We will update users as soon as practicable."

 

So there is a chance the e-petitions service may be closed. Just have to wait and see now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another call from the bonus hunters today they must be calling from somewhere else now because their number was barred before. I give up i just say im not in :p or give the wrong date of birth.

 

This is probably a long shot, but aren't BPF breaking the Data Protection Act by passing your phone number on to other people?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm also getting calls from 01514711776..these guys are leaving voice mails to call back BPF on 0844 number..i used to get calls from 0845..and they used to leave blank voice mails. seems to be they passed our details to some other party or might be they moved to a new place..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I answered the call, told them i'm awating FOS decision and don't want to be bothered with chasing of payments and they;ve held the account for the 30 days while it's being investigated. I would suggest answering if you don't want them to keep calling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ever One

 

What do you think i sood do i havent payed any money (not a penny )to bfp .when i was with advent i only got 1 book be 4 they went under ..at the moe im telling bfp that i have cancelled the course ( im lieing 2 them )with advent be 4 they went under and i must send them a letter saying the course has been cancelled...sood i just make a cancelled letter 2 send 2 them Twits...or just go along with that CT is Crap ....what sood i do ..i havent payed any money so i havent lose out on any thing but at the same time they are still trying 2 get some thing out of me

 

please HELP :(

Edited by the_shadow
Attempt to bypass swear filter
Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm also getting calls from 01514711776..these guys are leaving voice mails to call back BPF on 0844 number..i used to get calls from 0845..and they used to leave blank voice mails. seems to be they passed our details to some other party or might be they moved to a new place..

 

 

I was gettimg this a few weeks ago.

I called BPF, and told them i was in dispute [ had sent letter]

and if the calls did not stop from the point of this phone call,

i would complain to FOS and trading standings about the calls, and this would be ON A PER CALL BASIS [ just set a template letter and just change the times and dates] until the dispute was settled. And pointed out this could amount to fines worth more than the loan is worth.

They stopped from that point to this.

This all happened while the stupid girl was trying to talk all over me...

Idiots just after their bonus and target.

 

I do believe the 0151 is Liverpool code.

So that will be a bunch of clowns called Mercers - BPF dept collection dept.

Not an outside dept collection agency...so dont worry.

This lot are verbally nasty who think they are a law unto themselves.

Just Google 'Mercers' and you will get the picture...

 

Just remember that they are just hiding behind a telephone - they would never say it to your face.Dont be intimidated.

Edited by lowdown
Link to post
Share on other sites

BPF may not be breaching the Data Protection by using Mercer(nary) but surely they have breached it by giving our details to Computeach in the first place without asking for our permission? And obviously they have passed this information on to CT or CT wouldn't have been able to send us emails/letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they probably did breech data protection in the sense that Barclays gave them details of everyone on an advent course. Although Compufail and Barclays will argue that they are not in breech as the assets what Computeach bought from PKF probably consisted of a singular server that contained details of advent's students.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ever One

 

What do you think i sood do i havent payed any money (not a penny )to bfp .when i was with advent i only got 1 book be 4 they went under ..at the moe im telling bfp that i have cancelled the course ( im lieing 2 them )with advent be 4 they went under and i must send them a letter saying the course has been cancelled...sood i just make a cancelled letter 2 send 2 them Cu*t's...or just go along with that CT is Crap ....what sood i do ..i havent payed any money so i havent lose out on any thing but at the same time they are still trying 2 get some thing out of me

 

please HELP :(

 

I wouldn't make up the letter if I were you cos that could be fraud/forgery or something! You could keep trying to go along with the story but don't forge anything in writing, it could come back to bite you!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have till now ignored the phone calls and now I am receiving up to 4 calls a day sometimes a hang up when I answer one answer phone message was left at 7.30am, there is another place to report them to but I see they have been reported in the past. They don't seem to care about any regulatory body in any form. I thought if I let the calls increase and I keep a log then it'll be worse for them. ;)

 

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/bulletins/comp_bull_index/comp_bull_ocases/open_all/cw_905/BCs128090708.pdf

 

Section 1

1 Notification under section 128(1) of the

Communications Act 2003

1. This notification is issued to Barclays Bank plc, trading as Barclaycard (“Barclaycard”),

registered company number 1026167 and registered address 1 Churchill Place, London

E14 5HP.

2. This notification:

a. sets out Ofcom’s determination pursuant to section 128(1) of the Communications

Act 2003 (the “Act”);

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the dispute letter long time back, still had no response to my letter..when they called me for payments, i mentioned about the letter and also refused to pay them..also told them not to call me again n again until i had response to my dispute letter. But still they are calling 4/5 times from different numbers and asking for payments. i'm so sick of the situation and just want to send a strong letter to them to stop calling me..does anyone have a letter format of this kind to send to BPF..thanx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This post is from another site...

 

The lastest posts are at the bottom, it shows what you are up against.

Its just laughable..

This one is interesting.

 

Posted by: Cardinal_Hildebrand on 25/03/10 at 12:02 PM

Hi,

 

Im an ex-employee of Mercers. boo! hisss! No seriously, I worked there briefly a while back, and I hated it, could not leave quick enough. Its a bit of a call centre set-up for one thing, timing you in and out of your seat which was not me. But I think most people get used to that. For me what did it was the aggression, of 'take payments, take payments' mantra drummed into us in training. We were told what we were doing was 'helping customers', 'getting their accounts out of arrears, and putting their finances on an even keel'. But in truth they did not really care about customers. They want money, and they will use all kinds of threats to get it. These threats, they euphemistically called, 'levers', with which to get money out of people. I've seen some borderline blackmail tactics used too. By all accounts they can get away with less than some tactics they were using 20 years ago. Ultimately, I totally agree with this post about 'not for profit' collections agencies. This is because all the permanent staff at Mercers are on bonuses for payment collection on the phone, especially if payment plans they set up hold. Some are very good at the job and have been there for years. Taking payments sometimes adds up personally (for that agent) to a third extra on their annual income. They even have daily bonuses of wines, chocolates, ipods, everything. Collection agencies are probably a necessary evil in a capitalist system, like brokers, lawyers etc, but I do not see why it should be in private hands, surely a publically owned system is much farer, taking true account of the individual's circumstances, removing all these bloodsucking debt managementlink3.gif companies and debt collections agencies out there.

 

Some quick advice, as a person in the know, as most of you know Mercers are Barclaycard. They are in-house. And, they have to accept, in the end - down the line - any settlement amount you say you can afford. Even if its only a pound a month. 'Door-step collectors' another 'lever' used, is a bluff, they can't come in to your house to start taking your property. They are just a hollow threat, tell them to go away if they come around. Personally, I wouldn't pay them, I would take the hit, go bankrupt/IVA, 6 yearslink3.gif bad credit rating. Start again after that.

Edited by the_shadow
Link to post
Share on other sites

I answered the call, told them i'm awating FOS decision and don't want to be bothered with chasing of payments and they;ve held the account for the 30 days while it's being investigated. I would suggest answering if you don't want them to keep calling.

 

Maybe answer and state coldly you are taking legal advice and will contact them in due course - play their game! ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...