Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)Info and discussion thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hey all. just recieved my letter from BPF stating that my account is no longer on hold and I have to set my DD back up, which im not doing. I also sent a letter last week that I wished for my account to be put in dispute which i havent had a reply for yet so should i just hold out for a reply to that or send another letter.

 

I have not had the Dispute letter acknowledged either If your DD is cancelled as mine is too and I won't be setting it up either. I would just ignore it, If you are involved in the legal action we were advised not to contact BPF other than to inform them we are taking legal advice. and to put the accounts in Dispute.

They've ignored all our letters and haven't addressed any issues we have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We will have to be aware of many tactics they will try to trap you into giving them money. If they send demands for payment after they have received the dispute letter they can then be reported to the OFT,FLA,FLB,FSA and any other you can find that deals with unfair business practices.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This morning i Emailed Computeach outlining all my concerns over the 'like for like', S75,and all manner of publicty surrounding this fiasco and the complaints against them,[all very politely] and would not be taking up their offer, and kindly remove me from the Computeach database.

The reply did not address any of my concerns, But would remove me from the Datbase, and still pointed out that i should still pay BPF.

Edited by lowdown
Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked Computeach would they send me all books and materials for rest of certificates if i won`t finish my studing within finishing date.

They said they won`t provide any more materials unless i`ll pay for another period. So access to them fully depends on the progress of our education and if we'll fail with deadline date we won`t even get bloody books for which we paid as well....

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry i aint been on here for awhile,my net went down..any updates?

 

recieved this letter :

 

 

28 april 2010

account no: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

next payment due date : 23/05/2010

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I Wright in reference to your above numbererd account

 

Barclays Partner Finance has now sourced a new training provider to complete your training and i trust you have now been in contact with the allocated training provider (i have but i blanked them)

 

During the interim period of sourcing your new training provider, your account was placed on hold and no payments was requested from your account. I now write to advise that the hold has been removed from your account and payments will now become due in line with the terms ad conditions of your signed finance agreement

 

IF YOU HAVE CANCELLED YOUR DIRECT DEBIT INSTRUCTION WITH YOUR BANK you will need to have this re-instated. Please contact our customer service department on 0844 811 9000 who will be happy to assist.

 

IF YOUR CONTACTED BARCLAYS PARTNER FINANCE AND WE HAVE CANCELLED THE DIRECT DEBIT, you do not need to take any further action as we will reinstate this with the same details previously provided.

 

IF YOU DID NOT HAVE A DIRECT DEBIT INSTRUCTION IN PLACE you will need to make arrangments for an alternative method of payments as follows.

 

- debit /credit card payments can be made calling our customer services department on 0844 811 9000

 

 

-cheque payments can be sent to the above address (please include the account number on the back of the cheque)

 

- postal orders can be sent to the above address

 

-a standing order can be set up to account number 70185604, sort code 20-19-90 using your 16 digit account number as reference.

 

- bank giro payments can be made to any bank or post office (please call us to request a bank giro slip)

 

-internet or telephone banking can be also used sending payments to account number 70185604, sort code 20-19-90 using your 16 digit account number as reference.

 

your next payment will be due on the above date and on the same date each month thereafter

 

yours sincerely wilma thomson

customer relations manager

.

 

now i am stuck..wot to do next..took ages typen that out lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so as I understand you guys are not going to set up your DD again, right?

 

cause I cancelled mine thats why i am being harrassed by phone. will they still put my account on hold if they found computeach?

 

this is very unnerving. lets hope the protest went well and lots of people showed up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone seen the news today?

 

"Barclays Pre-tax profits for the first six months came in at £2.98bn ($5bn), although this was slightly below analysts' forecasts."

 

Well congratu-flippin-lations Barclays! You must be screwing over many many people!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

so as I understand you guys are not going to set up your DD again, right?

 

cause I cancelled mine thats why i am being harrassed by phone. will they still put my account on hold if they found computeach?

 

this is very unnerving. lets hope the protest went well and lots of people showed up.

 

Hi Maygav,

BPF put accounts on hold at the beginning of this fiasco cos there was no provider, but now they have Da-Daa( with trumpets) presented us with compufail then they are reactivating the accounts and taking them off hold.

 

So we don't want Compufail so we Dispute that BPF have provided a suitable provider. So we have the right to place the account in Dispute sending them a letter which says clearly this account is in Dispute see my previous posts for template letter back a page or two. This also gives you rights to not be chased for payment as you can also tell them you are taking legal advice and if they phone you after the dispute letter is received by them then you can report them for harrassment. Take back control of this, they're not going to get away with treating us like we don't have a brain. fight back :D

That's also for anyone in same position either put account in dispute you tell them this is what your doing. it's not up to them to refuse to do it. or they will up the pressure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Ive also just had the email that says it makes absolute sense to verify my student details, wonder what give them that idea

 

with incomputeach urging students to sign up and verify thier details seems very strange to me why would they want to do that if bpf have paid them for our tuition? or could it be once you sign up and agree bpf pay them? othrwise why are they so insistant on us signing up. i have not had a letter, phone call or email yet and dont rearly want any coms with them, the longer i dont hear the better the case against bpf will be for not providing an alternative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i did write them a letter from solicitor who did this for free for me, but i basicly asked them to terminate the contract and return my money based on the fact that advent had ignored me since october last year and plus that they went into administration. to that i got a generic fob off letter. which was just this week, so i sent an email to put my account on hold but i have not managed to sent a letter yet, too busy, uf... i will on monday and i will adjust it a bit more too,

 

thanks guys for all you help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but i basicly asked them to terminate the contract and return my money based on the fact that advent had ignored me.

 

And then BPF ignore you too ,they haven't answered any letter I wrote except with their fob offs or payment demands. That would be a complaint letter you sent but you'll need to do the Dispute one to get the protection from the OFT guidlines. Don't want them to harrass you anymore Maygav they'll get their's soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

with incomputeach urging students to sign up and verify thier details seems very strange to me why would they want to do that if bpf have paid them for our tuition? or could it be once you sign up and agree bpf pay them?

 

Correct as far as it goes. I suspect BPF won't in fact pay them all of the money until their contract is completed.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

with incomputeach urging students to sign up and verify thier details seems very strange to me why would they want to do that if bpf have paid them for our tuition? or could it be once you sign up and agree bpf pay them? othrwise why are they so insistant on us signing up. i have not had a letter, phone call or email yet and dont rearly want any coms with them, the longer i dont hear the better the case against bpf will be for not providing an alternative.

 

Hi Mantaxi,

There's something not right about their insistence about getting us to pay BPF. think you may be right they'll not get paid otherwise. or maybe Barclays contract is not being fulfilled if we don't accept them. It stinks and all will be revealed I hope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...