Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • So this is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
    • Yup, it isn't a criminal case, it's hard to prove, but take a detailed look at my thread to see how many holes there are in what they have sent me, there is a picture building.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)Info and discussion thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3921 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Apologies I was unable to get back on yesterday with the re-scanned letter from Barclays, but I see 10pack has kindly posted up what it says anyway, and it's identical to the letter I had. I had to shake my head when I read 'you're obliged to continue your repayments' - my loan was paid off last Dec!

 

On the mis-selling issue, I too chose Advent basically because they offered the recruitment team support service. I've trawled Computeach's website and, while they offer to help people with their CVs and interview techniques, they do not offer a specialist team who sources job placements in your local area, as the Advent salesman promised me. Here's the proof of what he offered in their confirmation letter....

[ATTACH]17440[/ATTACH]

 

He also took a copy of my CV and promised to forward it to the recruitment team so they could start looking for a basic web developer position for me within the 10 mile radius of where I live that I specified I was happy to commute within!

 

I know it's been raised that many of us are hanging on to the mis-selling issue and didn't see this as a problem before the collapse of Advent, but I really DO think that this course was mis-sold to me in the light of the poor support I received after starting the course.

I was under no illusions about what the Master CIW Designer course entailed, and thought myself pretty capable of achieving it. I am a qualified graphic designer with 10 years employment background in web and magazine design, and this looked an ideal way to be able to update my skills in order to get back into that after a break, while still holding down an admin job. When I explained to the salesman I would find it hard to get to the workshops as they were midweek and taking time off work and staying overnight during the week was not an option, he said don't worry about that as the workshops were an optional part of the course.

I took the mock and failed it, but received no mentoring advice other than to try the multiple answer tests at the end of the book chapters and email them in to Advent for marking - I had the answers book so I could have done that for myself! I was given no helpful advice on further reading for example to help with my weak areas, and was appalled when I was told I could look the answers up for questions I found difficult....what was the point of that! I wouldn't be able to do that in an exam and it wouldn't give me a clear picture of where I was at knowledge-wise.

 

I can't see any of the web software that was on my course spec covered by Computeach, at least according to their website, so for me at least I think they'll be unable to complete my training, even if I'd wanted them to.

 

I didnt get anything like that.. I had the sales bloke tell me that because I was out of work I would be able to wizz through the first part of the course and they would be looking for job places for me.

 

They did not ask me for a cv or even show me jobs that were available just asked if I was willing to work anywhere in the world since they had job contacts that needed workers in places such as Australia and Newzealand.. (I was open to offers to work abroad before this anyway, got no kids and I split with my ex awhile back).

 

Computeach internal exams are even better.. when you fail they send you back you answer paper marked.. and you get a chance to re-sit with the exact same exam question papers.. but because the questions are so vague even if you copy an answer that you got full marks on it does not mean you will get the same full marks the second time around, and thats how they wear you down until either time runs out or you realise what they are doing and give up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I didnt get anything like that.. I had the sales bloke tell me that because I was out of work I would be able to wizz through the first part of the course and they would be looking for job places for me.

 

They did not ask me for a cv or even show me jobs that were available just asked if I was willing to work anywhere in the world since they had job contacts that needed workers in places such as Australia and Newzealand.. (I was open to offers to work abroad before this anyway, got no kids and I split with my ex awhile back).

 

Computeach internal exams are even better.. when you fail they send you back you answer paper marked.. and you get a chance to re-sit with the exact same exam question papers.. but because the questions are so vague even if you copy an answer that you got full marks on it does not mean you will get the same full marks the second time around, and thats how they wear you down until either time runs out or you realise what they are doing and give up.

 

 

Good point but i think if CT have to honour Advents original terms then they will want to get us through it as quickly as possible. as they will not get any extra money off of us the longer we take. Just a thought anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my letter this morning with the "your with computeach now" message. I just want to cancel everything and get clean of this entire thing. I have already started looking at other career avenues as I can't see this one working for me. Should ring the barclays customer relations line to try and get it cancelled or would it be a waste of time trying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my letter this morning with the "your with computeach now" message. I just want to cancel everything and get clean of this entire thing. I have already started looking at other career avenues as I can't see this one working for me. Should ring the barclays customer relations line to try and get it cancelled or would it be a waste of time trying?

 

Read my post further down, I already called... barclays is pushing us to go with computeach, as far as barclays is concerned they have finished with us and our complaints.. they are expecting to be paid as per contract.

 

I will be writing in to barclays with my views.. they already know them from my phone call and from reading here on this thread.. but they will still make me go through the motions wasting more of my time.

 

I did tell the bloke I am so certain about what will happen with computeach I may as well just give barclays their money now and

not bother calling computeach and not training, because that will in effect happen if I waste my time with computeach.

Edited by 10pack
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing which may be interesting:

 

I phoned an advent service desk about a year ago to enquire what my options were in terms of cancelling my course (since i wanted to instead study at university). Although the advent employee was very sympathetic, she told me that i basically had no options.

 

Later on in the week however, i received a letter in the post pretty much giving me this option.

 

For my first workshop in kiddiminster, as a goodwill gesture, advent would:

 

Pay my costs to commute both to and from the workshop location

 

OR

 

Pay for one nights accomodation on the day of the workshop.

 

Would Computeach do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a quick think about the next steps over lunch.

 

First we need to contact CT by phone and request contact details of someone who we can write to about our "unique" training requirements. As mentioned on here many times, get everything in writing!!.

 

Write to them and request a complete package of their offer for the completion of the training. Including any deadlines/timescales/workshop locations and fees for additional time etc....

 

Write to BFP and enclose a copy of the letter above. Ask for your account to remain frozen until your analysis (as mentioned by me earlier today) is complete as you cannot continue your course until you have been able to confirm that the training matches what you originally signed up for and under the same constraints.

 

Once you have a package in writing, then compare against your original Advent course spec.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just called the Computeach number, out of interest, to ask -

do you cover the web design software listed on my Advent spec?

is there a time limit on when we have to finish by as Advent was a supposedly self-paced course, with the chance to re-sit the exam if you fail at no extra cost?

She was unable to answer and someone is going to call me back!!

I told her I didn't want Computeach as a provider and she seemed unsure what to say, then told me that Barclays may look at another provider if they don't do the CIW Designer package....

 

Start drafting my 'shove it Barclays' letter now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing which may be interesting:

 

I phoned an advent service desk about a year ago to enquire what my options were in terms of cancelling my course (since i wanted to instead study at university). Although the advent employee was very sympathetic, she told me that i basically had no options.

 

Later on in the week however, i received a letter in the post pretty much giving me this option.

 

For my first workshop in kiddiminster, as a goodwill gesture, advent would:

 

Pay my costs to commute both to and from the workshop location

 

OR

 

Pay for one nights accomodation on the day of the workshop.

 

Would Computeach do this?

My question exactly

 

The advent rep told me i would get my expenses paid, when it came to my first workshop and asked them how this would happen and they told me he was wrong but still paid for half of my accommodation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a quick think about the next steps over lunch.

 

First we need to contact CT by phone and request contact details of someone who we can write to about our "unique" training requirements. As mentioned on here many times, get everything in writing!!.

 

Write to them and request a complete package of their offer for the completion of the training. Including any deadlines/timescales/workshop locations and fees for additional time etc....

 

Write to BFP and enclose a copy of the letter above. Ask for your account to remain frozen until your analysis (as mentioned by me earlier today) is complete as you cannot continue your course until you have been able to confirm that the training matches what you originally signed up for and under the same constraints.

 

Once you have a package in writing, then compare against your original Advent course spec.

 

That's a good idea, JuicyBuns.

When, if, Computeach call back I'll insist they do that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When i spoke to Computeach earlier, they told me that they would be writing to every student regarding their own situation. This will take some considerable time. They sounded overwhelmed by the current situation.

 

In the meantime all loan accounts should remain frozen as we are still not getting the service we paid for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When are you expective to hear back from the solicitor a4ron?

 

He did say he'd get back to me probably this Tues or Weds, once he's had a look at the contracts. But I've also heard from another company I'd contacted at the same time and will have more on Weds as to whether they are willing to take us on as a class action.

 

I'll say no more than that for now as Barclays will be reading here I'm sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I'm another advent student thats got finance through BPF. Just like to say thanks for all the advice thats been put on here, been most helpful.

 

I have to say that after everything thats happened with Advent the thought of going with another provider fills me with dread. My confidence with these companies is rock bottom.

 

I've been reading on here that after 2 years with computeach if you haven't passed you have to pay for additional studies, is this true? When i signed on with advent i wasn't told of any timeframe that the course must be completed by, you studied in your own time which did appeal to me as i'm not the fastest leaner and any time frame would of strongly put me off. All the sales rep said was that on averge it would take 2 years to complete nothing about time frames. If this is the case i can't see i can accept computeach.

 

Also I've sent BPF a letter asking for a refund under S75 but they replied saying no as we're gonna find you an alternative provider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just rang consumer direct. They have told me to write a letter to barclays outlining why the new provider is not suitable. But it is down to use to prove that they are not suitable. I have been told to write that I want a reply between 10-14 days. Then get back in touch with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I'm another advent student thats got finance through BPF. Just like to say thanks for all the advice thats been put on here, been most helpful.

 

I have to say that after everything thats happened with Advent the thought of going with another provider fills me with dread. My confidence with these companies is rock bottom.

 

I've been reading on here that after 2 years with computeach if you haven't passed you have to pay for additional studies, is this true? When i signed on with advent i wasn't told of any timeframe that the course must be completed by, you studied in your own time which did appeal to me as i'm not the fastest leaner and any time frame would of strongly put me off. All the sales rep said was that on averge it would take 2 years to complete nothing about time frames. If this is the case i can't see i can accept computeach.

 

Also I've sent BPF a letter asking for a refund under S75 but they replied saying no as we're gonna find you an alternative provider.

 

I was told by the guy who phoned.. luke that you were paying for 2 years worth of study.. and you could take on as many modules as you wished.. if you could wizz through them you could technically have done every module.. though that would have been something to test it all out.

 

He told me that since I was out of work I could have gone though my first module in about 3 months and been taking my microsoft exam.

 

I bet good money that you will not be anywhere near doing this with computeach.. they will not let you achieve it they will fail you on their internal exams.

It would have been good if the question papers were just multiple choice at least you have a one in three chance of getting a correct answer, but I dont remember many of those, think city and guilds when you had a question and you had to write an answer think about half an A4 page on each question.. that would be reasonable, but problem is the question is so vague you would not in many instances know the answer.

Question I always remember "why do we use an IBM 360 computer" (its a mainframe computer I know this.. thats how long ago I was student)

So no reference in the course work.. it was all books no computer disks, and the answer? well maybe they got it cheap.. maybe even its a industry standard machine.. who would know?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fuzzbutt,

I was told exactly the same. I guess its another one for 'mis-sold' argument but its gonna be my word against the reps. I'll check my paper work tonight. Where abouts did it state 2 years in your contract.

 

I have not read about two years.. its what the guy on the phone told me you are paying for two years worth of study and backup no matter how many courses you take.. also if you fail your exam they also covered you for a resit no extra charge.

I thought that in two years I should have been able to get most of what I wanted done specially when he told me I should be ready to take my exam and be ready for a placement by their job centre in about 3 months.. thats what gave me the confidence to go ahead and sign up.

 

He also told me their job centre did not charge companies for placements of advent students and it was something agencies were unhappy about because they got many jobs for students from the repeat inquiries from companies for advent students.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all,

this is my first post here , but i've been reading all your advices from the first, really made me feel I am not alone....

actually my accont with BFB was on "one year no pay"... and i'm due to pay in may:(

I just called barcleys to ask frozen my account to solve all these, but the entirly rude lady( i think called caroline!) shout at me that we wont do that and you have to accept the new provider,,,, i ask to talk to complain department, she reapeted NO! ( realy rude!) she made me cry over the phone!!!!! I ask her for any kind of help but she refuse to do anythings!!!

 

I think i have to get £5000 loan from somewhere else and pay them in full:(( unless they happily gonna make it double....

this is a nightmare..... i cant beleve its happening:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fuzzbutt,

I was told exactly the same. I guess its another one for 'mis-sold' argument but its gonna be my word against the reps. I'll check my paper work tonight. Where abouts did it state 2 years in your contract.

 

It's on the blue copy of the Advent contract, Turfs75, 2nd box down where it says 'start date' & 'end date' under course title.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3921 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...