Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
    • Thanks. We'll try to help over the weekend. If the hearing is on 05/07 then it's 90% sure that the deadline for filing your WS is 21/06.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome - illegal repo in contravention of section 92 and unfair relationship ** WON **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

morning bee:)

 

just been reading around the threads, wot i am now begining to understand is that under ECHR, we as a LiP are supposed to be put on an equal footing. however "we are not". take for example in your case, if the creditor had screwed up, it would be a simple case of re-submit and very little costs awarded to yourself (if any). has your case been allocated to track yet:confused:

 

cab

 

No we certainly are not!

Nope not allocated as it never got that far due to them trying to strike out, resubmitted on friday so its back to waiting for it to be served then 14days to get their acknowledgement/defence etc in :mad:

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

No we certainly are not!

Nope not allocated as it never got that far due to them trying to strike out, resubmitted on friday so its back to waiting for it to be served then 14days to get their acknowledgement/defence etc in :mad:

 

THEN I WOULD THINK THAT THE COSTS INCURRED ARE NOT "ACCURATE"

 

what track would it be when allocated.

 

cab

Link to post
Share on other sites

THEN I WOULD THINK THAT THE COSTS INCURRED ARE NOT "ACCURATE"

 

what track would it be when allocated.

 

cab

 

 

Itll be fast trak when allocated...

 

They applied for 1538 in costs due to 8 hrs at £161 an hr preparing docs plus court fees of £75 and extras were £200 (They did list them cannot remember what they were off the top of my head) judge agreed they were extortionate and let them have the court fees plus the solicitors fees hence £625 instead... we better stop hijacking wannabe's thread :lol:

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fancy having all these random conversations and starting a whole new page without me!!! :lol:

 

It's ok, you can hijack my thread if you like I'm nice like that :D

 

Well they don't know anything else other than how to charge ludicrous amounts of money for nothing in particular dressed up as something ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fancy having all these random conversations and starting a whole new page without me!!! :lol:

 

It's ok, you can hijack my thread if you like I'm nice like that :D

 

Well they don't know anything else other than how to charge ludicrous amounts of money for nothing in particular dressed up as something ;)

 

 

Sorry hun but you were AWOL :lol:

 

I was just thinking it would be confusing for anyone reading your thread :lol:

 

I showed my m8 who works as PA to property solicitor and she was like :lol: yea i type those all the time the 8 hrs is perusing documents I said f**k at £161 an hr he should know it all by heart!! :-D

 

 

 

Did I tell you I got my car back?? :grin:

 

You may have mentioned it once or twice :lol: Im so pleased for you :)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry hun but you were AWOL :lol:

 

I was just thinking it would be confusing for anyone reading your thread :lol:

 

I showed my m8 who works as PA to property solicitor and she was like :lol: yea i type those all the time the 8 hrs is perusing documents I said f**k at £161 an hr he should know it all by heart!! :-D

 

 

 

Did I tell you I got my car back?? :grin:

 

You may have mentioned it once or twice :lol: Im so pleased for you :)

Yh but he's not even a solicitor so how can he justify asking for £161 an hour cos I'm damn sure welcome don't pay him that!!!! According to my costs summary his title is "Logal compliance officer", check out the spelling man!! There's no way he gets that salary when he can't even spell! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

something else to play with when you have a few spare minutes,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/262962-capquest-cab1ne.html#post2969455

 

cab

Excellent! All my puppies have gone to their new homes now so I suddenly have rather alot of time on my hands! Just need to watch Holby and catch up on my sleep :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yh but he's not even a solicitor so how can he justify asking for £161 an hour cos I'm damn sure welcome don't pay him that!!!! According to my costs summary his title is "Logal compliance officer", check out the spelling man!! There's no way he gets that salary when he can't even spell! :lol:

 

 

He's not even got a title on mine :lol: He's a grade C fee earner :lol:

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent! All my puppies have gone to their new homes now so I suddenly have rather alot of time on my hands! Just need to watch Holby and catch up on my sleep :roll:

 

 

Awwww bye babies!!

 

Welcome :rolleyes: back hun :)

 

Im watching holby too so back at 9 :lol:

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG!! Who was that man who attacked Connie????!

 

 

Welcome to Holby Anon :lol: I duno coz I missed abit walked back in room and she was being attacked!

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats ok im gonna get booted for hi jacking ppls threads at this rate :lol:

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry I won't report you, promise :p

 

 

you might not but some poor sod trying to read your thread might haha

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

THEY'VE FILED THEIR AQ!!!!!!!! :lol:

 

The cheeky sod has put in his AQ that I am seeking return of the vehicle. Brilliant!!! It just couldn't get better! So he's aware I'm seeking the return of the vehicle, so how the hell can he justify pre-empting the judges decision and selling the car after the case was allocated???? :lol:

 

I know they did it cos I've got the evidence sitting right outside my house! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet again he has skirted round the illegal repo issue and stated that cos the car was on hp I have no right to it! I never said I did CP! I said it was illegally repossessed but you have failed to answer that and in fact you have admitted it :D See you in court Mr P, let's hope you come yourself this time instead of sending a little boy who tried to argue with the judge! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...