Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NSL Clamping with TAX!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HELP HELP HELP!!

 

Back in November last year my car was clamped on a friday morning, this was because i had no tax. However the tax was purchased online the night b4.

 

When i asked them to come and unclamp my vehicle i was told that b4 i do i must pay for a tax disc or pay the fine, as my car is showing that it is "SORN"ed. After telling them that it was taxed last night and have the confirmation email to prove it, they said that this alone is not proof enough. And they told me that i would have to wait till Monday morning for them to come and unclamp me. After they had spoken to the DVLA, or i pay. But if they wanted they could of spoken to the DVLA whenever as it is a 24hr line, and found out from them

 

Anyway come monday i phoned and was told by some1 else that a confirmation email is fine and will be out to unclamp me. Which is fine.

However after digging around a bit i found out that the car park i was on was a ASDA one and was not public highway, and because my car was SORNed, should'nt have been clamped. I sent a letter to NSL stating this. However they are refusing to admit they were wrong, And they said even if my car was taxed i should have waited till the tax disc arrived. However i always thought that if you buy a tax b4 the old 1 runs out or the sorn runs out you have a 5 days grace. After speaking to a DVLA rep she said that this is correct!!!!

So can some1 help and tell me what to do next. I want COMP!!! Thank u

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it was taxed the day before, you have said that. What was it the day before that? I am guessing SORN'd. So, how did you drive to the ASDA car park? Across the fields or along public roads? If public roads then a seperate offence of not displaying a valid VED could come in too.

 

ASDA car park is public highway as far as driving offences are concerned, because the public can drive straight in and out. SO.if you were to say drive aroudn ASDA car park drunk,. you could and would be done fro drink driving offences even though it is not actually a raod. See what I mean?

 

Don't get me wrong. It is very nasty when you have actually taxed it. However, although the system is getting better, there will be occasions like this where you will get clamped. It won't cost you anything in the end, so stop worrying. As for Comp, don't forget the issue of being on a public highway with a VED showing before you ask them!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the DVLA if you apply for a new tax disc b4 the old 1 expires or b4 the SORN expires then i have a grace period.

the car was driven from home. but what i dont understand is if i park it on my private car space at home it can also be clamped is what you are saying coz any1 can drive on there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dune, you are completely right.

 

If you had paid the tax online and had the receipt, you are completely entitled to drive your car.

 

As they clamped your car, they essentially 'arrested' it.

 

They had 'NO' right to do so.

 

I would be inclined to send the parasites a LBA, containing all the additional costs that you bore that weekend (hire car/taxi's) etc.

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the only problem is all i have is a £12.50 rec for a taxi. but surely i can claim for the inconvience of not having a car. they were going to charge me £100 pound a day so i was thinking £412.50 as it was clamped for 4 days plus Phone calls. Have a chance or not............

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it was taxed the day before, you have said that. What was it the day before that? I am guessing SORN'd. So, how did you drive to the ASDA car park? Across the fields or along public roads? If public roads then a seperate offence of not displaying a valid VED could come in too.

 

Not relevant. It would have to have been actually seen on the public highway and provably so beyond reasonable doubt. Failure to display is a Police matter, not DVLA

 

ASDA car park is public highway as far as driving offences are concerned, because the public can drive straight in and out. SO.if you were to say drive aroudn ASDA car park drunk,. you could and would be done fro drink driving offences even though it is not actually a raod. See what I mean
?

 

Not quite. For the purposes of the RTA (ie drink/driving) an open car park is considered to be a part of the public highway. However, for DVLA matters, there is a totally different definition of a public highway - "a road maintained at public expense" - which an ASDA car park is patently not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NSL are correct you can only use the vehicle if waiting for a renewal applied for before the old one ran out in the post for up to 5 days if its a new disc you need to wait for it to arrive. NSL/DVLA can clamp on ANY property if the vehicle is not taxed or sorn'd as long as its not a part of a private residence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Asda's car park is private property. So are petrol station forecourts.

 

The fact the public can freely drive onto this property is does not make it public highway.

 

(I understand that Asda and the owners of petrol stations actively encourage people to do so)

 

Years ago when I was younger and stupider, our local Starsky and Hutch in a 1.6 Escort Mark 2 panda car spotted my expired tax disc while I was filling up with 4 star then stopped me 100 yards down the road.

 

I knew he had clocked me back at the BP, and asked why they hadnt bothered to pull me back there.

 

He told me they had to catch me on the public highway, which the petrol station wasnt. (Got fined, points on licence etc)

 

Got a ticket for parking on double yellows, from coppers in a Sainsbury's car park, ie private property. Letter to the chief inspector pointing this out produced an apology and No Further Action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

payment of road tax automatically takes a vehicle off SORN. If NSL don't stay up to date that their problem, both NSL and the DVLA know they have on-line issuance so it seems they either don't bother to check immediately before they clamp or don't have the capability. Either is wrong. I am sure NSL will have access the online records and could checked from their office. A civil claim against NSL and the DVLA, let them fight it out who pays you back for costs and loss of use of vehicle. You were not liable and they served you a detriment their own failing- end of. They also failed to 'stop and correct'. Bring the NSL access to the DVLA records into the claim and get it revealed under CPR - they may well settle before court just to prevent having to open the kimono. After their usual bluster which you may get plenty of. This one could be fun. Keep a log of everything you have done (costs etc) and everything you do from now on, printing costs hours spent etc. Your remedy should be commensurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the OP has not stated is when the VEL started as they are only available for complete months did they back date it or start it at the beginning of December. If you renew online you can only drive without the new disc because your vehicle is already taxed however the OP had no tax at the time of application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was taxed on the Friday 13th november typical.....

So the date is from the 1st of november. However the dvla say that I could not get done for the offence of not displaying a tax disc because my sorn had not expired. Cheers guys for the advice any more tips.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...