Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yes Car And Charging Order ** WON **


gdk2711
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4978 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 448
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

no we wont use the same letter, we understand you are still in dispute with godebt and would not wish to jepordize that it was simply for reference for use in other set asides etc on godebt and gives us a good incite into what they actually think

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's cool Mate.

 

I gotta get mine set aside and wait for a court date yet...

 

Hopefully you should be done and dusted by then.

 

Thanks mate i have sent the letter today signed..

my solicitor will recieve it monday..

they did confirm it will take 2 weeks to finish all relitive paperwork..

I WILL LET YOU KNOW WHEN MY PAPERWORK ARRIVES....

Link to post
Share on other sites

no we wont use the same letter, we understand you are still in dispute with godebt and would not wish to jepordize that it was simply for reference for use in other set asides etc on godebt and gives us a good incite into what they actually think

 

Totally Agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no we wont use the same letter, we understand you are still in dispute with godebt and would not wish to jepordize that it was simply for reference for use in other set asides etc on godebt and gives us a good incite into what they actually think

 

THANK YOU...

Well its in the hands of solicitors anyway and i have sent signed copy of deed back to them so i am waiting for my solicitor to sort things out

Its the solicitor who has sorted this out for me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate i have sent the letter today signed..

my solicitor will recieve it monday..

they did confirm it will take 2 weeks to finish all relitive paperwork..

I WILL LET YOU KNOW WHEN MY PAPERWORK ARRIVES....

 

Yeah looking forward to your next update.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive Been Going Over The Letter From The Solicitor And Confirms What I Have Been Saying All Along

 

The Yes Car Agreements Are Crap Because Any Deposit HAS Been Included In Paying The Ppi.

 

Go Debt Will State Its In Clause Xyz On The Agreement

 

Thats Bogus As The T&c Do Not Overide The Consumer Credit Act

 

The Total Amount Of Credit Has Been Mis-stated, Being A Prescribed Term, Game Over, A Court Cannot Enforce

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i cannot understand is how the court did enforce it

Thats the worrying part not just for me..But others in the same boat

RE: charge order and ccj....

As my solicitor has sorted this matter out for me now..

only for them i would have been fighting till the end of time

 

BUMP

Link to post
Share on other sites

the court enforced it because you did not originally defend the ccj and then the co came on top of that...if you had defended the original ccj then we could have fought that on the basis of unenforceability due to incorrect credit being misstated...the court would not have even looked at the documents they would have just given the ccj as you didnt defend..this is why on cag we tell everyone to defend any attempt to gain a ccj on behalf of dca

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be deleting my account forthwith

As been warned for helping caggers with there problems

by advising them that the solicitors that helped me

and posting a link

So it seems that even posting the letter that helped me is also wrong

but its ok for fellow caggers to post links for other related items to help people. Seems a bit wrong to me...one rule for one as the saying goes

SORRY FELLOW CAGGERS BUT I WONT BE POSTING THE UPDATE PROMISED

 

sorry to all

Hope you find the help from others

As mine is wrong

 

BUMP BUMP BUMP

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am sorry to see you are deleting your account gdk you are in a position now to help a lot more caggers with the knowledge you now have and will have in the future...the problem with posting the solicitors link is that it is favouring one solicitor over another... and there are threads on here with people who have used this particular solicitor and not had such a pleasant outcome as yourself..however that said you did what you thought was correct.. and i for one will be sorry if you do not continue to help on here good luck with your case and hope everything works out for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for you kind words

But lets be honest there are some cases you cant even win let alone a solicitor...we are all aware of that......

 

i thought these sites are here to help

And not about someone pulling people down for trying to help

if i only help one person then so be it....

But at least i helped that must count for something

Link to post
Share on other sites

you may be right and perhaps sometimes having to use the services of a solicitor may be the best course of action...as before i do hope you will continue to help, you now have a unique knowledge in getting this particular nasty dca to back down and i hope you will continue to help out for the sake of other posters who find themselves on the recieving end of these bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I See Your Point

But I Am Only Offering The Help Toward Go-debt Ycc/d.a.f Agreements

Not Any Other Matter

But Will Not Mention Them Again Unless Asked From Cagger

 

Bump

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi gdk2711

 

Please leave your thread up.

 

You have had a rocky ride with this one but it is a good example of how people in deep difficulties can overcome them and is an important thread that adds to the body of knowledge here.

 

Don't be dismayed if you have been told not to do something. Every organization has it's rules and many on here have been brought up short. that does not mean the rules are bad and it does not mean you have been singled out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That I Understand

So why Not Be pleasant and A Little More understanding.

I Understand now About The Solicitor Part

All I Want To Do Is Help

Not As If Im Quoting The Magna Carta

Edited by gdk2711
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i will stay and keep thread going...

i will update postgjj and debt4get when all is finalized...

and paperwork is in my hand....................

STILL LOOKING FOR A GOOD PICTURE FRAME THOUGH

 

BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

martin3030

Before throwing in a comment he should of checked the thread..

and seen what i have posted and what you and deby4get asked for in order to help fellow caggers..............

but were all human and make mistakes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...