Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, it's good that you have five days before you're supposed to go there, there is time enough to sort things out.  See if Booking.com rear their head tomorrow.
    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yes Car And Charging Order ** WON **


gdk2711
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4984 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 448
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

it is ordered that this petition be dismissed

and it is ordered that the registration of the petition action at the land registry charges dept of land registry on 20th october 2008 under ref no-------be vacated upon the application of the debtor under the land charges rule

that was a bankruptcy petition filed 15 oct 2008

and the letter dated on bottom 20th january 2009

that was at wrexham c/c

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It would seem to me that a set aside application would be the first step in this matter.

 

I'm not normally given to sharing personal experience but in this instance I must say that when I had occassion to make such an application, I simply stated that I did not receive the paperwork and that I beleived I had a full defence to their originating claim. My set aside application was allowed on that basis. Which meant the CCJ was removed and the application made to apply a charging order to my home was temporarily stayed until the matter went to court.

 

If you enact the same - then it may be that your charging order is temporarily removed along with the CCJ.

 

When I got to court; Clearly, I had to prove that I did not get the paperwork - I was able to show that I resided elsewhere and that the new address was known to the creditor as a 'correspondance address'. So there was no reason why they could not have made sure the paperwork came to me directly, I was also given the time to defend their orignating claim - They lost and the case was found in my favour - and the CCJ was removed and the charging order 'struck out' (it was a funny case actually, because it was for a debt that I had run up, never paid a penny against and then they ended up paying me for charges that they had applied to the account - champion!!)

 

My advise would be, never assume that because a Solicitor or any Company slaps a letter on official looking headed paper that they are right - the Solicitor is only acting on 'behalf' of a Company - that Company may have their facts wrong - so challenge anything that a Solicitor says or does - they are just the Monkey - you have to deal with the organ grinder...

 

The charging order is already in place - the fact that you are being pursued for the debt by a DCA is irrelevant - ignore them - get that charging order off your house before you sell it - I'll tell you why - if you don't.... and the house does sell, you need to be aware that the acting solicitor is obliged to free the house of any debts before the other party can complete thier purchase - those debts will be paid out of any of the equity and you and your girlfriend will be left to share the difference; however you wish to split the balance.

 

Whilst you have a court date set for next month - as soon as the court honors your application to get the orignating claim set aside the court date set for next month will also be set aside - as the set aside hearing will take precedent (come first). (just make sure you mention either in your set aside application that there is a court date set for next month that you would like to be set aside as well until the matter regarding the orignating claim is heard as they are both to do with the same matter)

 

Hope this helps put things in perspective for you

 

Apple : )

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

i was at a different address...

The car was taken from there (not from the house)as the guy picking the car up only knew one spot...

any way that was an x's and i have no details from living there in 2005

now its getting worse

Link to post
Share on other sites

There you go then. :D

 

Apply for setaside on the grounds that PPI was unlawfully mis- sold and that therefore the agreement is unenforceable due to the interest stated in the Prescribed Terms being incorrect and that therefore the credit agreement is fatally flawed.

Where are the prescribed terms and conditions

I only got sent an agreement

how do i need to word this on set aside notice

need to get this set aside in to the courts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok

Looks like i will need to sort this myself...

Been to long for reply As i have to get the paperwork in soon as

I have been on tho the court today...

They advise to get set aside in soon as possible with all relitive paperwork to support application

 

BUMP!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gdk2711

 

I have read a few pages back on your thread here. From what i can see they have a charging order / CCJ as well without you appearing in court.

 

You will have to apply to the court for a "Set Aside". To do this you fill in court form N244 found here:

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_e.pdf

 

This application form should be filled in and your reasons for asking the court for a Set Aside. These reasons are that you were not aware of the claim being made against you until after judgment. Usually a court will agree to set aside judgment if you can show that you did not receive any court papers and therefore were not aware of the court case against you. For example, you may have moved and the Claimant may have given your old address to the court.

 

An application for a stay of execution is necessary to stop the Claimant from trying to enforce judgment. You can make this application without telling the Claimant and the court can make an order without the Claimant being at court. When you make your application to set aside judgment the court will fix a hearing date. Both you and the Claimant will have to go to this hearing. You will have to explain why you want the court to set aside judgment. If the court sets aside judgment you will be allowed to put in a Defence explaining why you do not agree with the Claimant's claim. The court will also give you a timetable to explain what you must do next. For example, you may have to tell the Plaintiff what documents you want to use to prove your Defence and if you have witness they may have to make a statement which you must send copies of to the Plaintiff.

 

Also you should fill in an income and expenditure sheet to show the judge your income and outgoings. This will help him / her decide how much you can afford to pay if the judge finds that the claiment has the correct paperwork and their claim is valid.

 

Whilst this is going through it maybe an idea to send a letter to Godebt / Yescar credit to get them to send ALL of the documents they have on file. There MUST be unlawful charges there, also the possibility of some commissions paid out. Letter is here:

 

Dear Sirs

 

Account number

 

I write with regards to the above account with your organisation.

 

I respectfully request that you provide me by return a true copy of the underwriting sheet or any other documents showing any commissions paid by you to the broker or by the broker to you. I require this as I have reason to believe that there may be undisclosed commissions. Obviously if your organisation has paid, or has been paid, an undisclosed commission, I would be entitled to rescind the contract or seek other remedies.

 

I must stress this request is made pursuant to the Civil Procedurelink8.gif Rules ( Pre action protocols and Part 31.16) and therefore only a copies of the original documents in its unaltered form will suffice in these circumstances. I reserve the right to seek a court order for your compliance should you refuse.

 

I do not view this as an unreasonable request given that by supplying the document which I have asked for it will allow me to assess if my case has merit and will help to resolve matters possibly without the need to involve the court and will undoubtedly save costs on both sides

 

I look forward to your reply and would ask for a response by 4pm on XXXX Date ( Give 21 days to respond)

 

Regards

 

(Sign here using signguard)

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...