Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Let me start by saying I feel tremendous regret, shame and remorse. I have some debt and personal life has fallen apart over the last year which has caused me to be careless. Doesn’t make it okay I know. In a positive way, i will never take anything in life for granted ever again. I want to volunteer and go back to being a good person. I need some advice/reassurance on the below so I can move on better from this experience. A few days ago I was caught at sainsburys, I paid for part of the food (about £5) and didn’t pay for the other (about £8-10) at self checkout. when I got to the exit someone in plain clothes asked to see my receipt and bag and that they worked for mitie. I told him the receipt was in the store bin (true) and he said he followed me round and knows I didn’t pay for all of it. he very sternly but calmly said he just needs my name then I can leave with the shopping. I said i am in a bad day and can’t do this and was on the verge of breaking down. So I handed him the shopping and slowly walked out. No name given (I read elsewhere this is good and makes it unlikely to develop) and I have no way knowing if police contacted. I overthink a lot and I wonder if they can track me via debit card or nectar card on the transaction. I also wonder if they saw me do it last month and have been waiting for me. I know someone who works at their head office and terrified somehow it will get back. I’m also terrified of being recognised in the street.    I don’t know what’s going to happen. I see a lot in the news today about shoplifting 
    • Hi, I’ve just spotted an Arrangement to Pay marker (TransUnion) on my Barclays Mortgage account for 1 month in March 2022. I’ve spoken to Barclays Customer Service and Complaints about this and they’ve given me some background but have closed my complaint: Direct Debit for mortgage bounced in February and I didn’t notice this at the time. Realised there were arrears in March and called customer service straight away. Offered to pay half the arrears on the call with the other half of the arrears the following month. I prob suggested or accepted this as had done that many years previously when I was a poor student with no adverse consequences. Paid in accordance with this. Barclays call notes report they informed me credit reference agencies would be notified and I indicated I understood. However, complaints team couldn’t access the call because it was too old. They advised I could request a transcript through GDPR and complain via ombudsman if still unhappy - I’ll process the GDPR request this week. Whilst it may be factual that I entered into some kind of arrangement regarding the arrears, it wasn’t clear to me that they would be treating it and reporting it as a formal payment plan along with the potential consequences of this. At no point did I agree to or request to “reducing my contractual payments” - I paid my contractual amount for March and April with 50% more on top. I guess it’s likely they did say something vague about credit reference agencies and it’s also possible that I may have agreed without fully understanding it would be different to a late payment marker. I’m not 100% sure of the impact of the AP but I believe it did tighten up balance transfer and new card offers (Lloyds group in particular) even though the rest of my report is spotless and I have many years managing multiple high balance cards. Although it may have been less comfortable, I also believe I had the means to pay the balance in full if I’d realised the impact at the time. Finally, it feels like Ive been penalised for speaking to customer services directly rather than just upping my payments to cover the arrears. Historically, I was under the impression that Barclays mortgages weren’t even reporting arrears of less than 2-3 months as late payments - although this may have changed since the last time I was in arrears. I’ve had a browse through threads about AP markers and it seems like removal is unlikely if it’s deemed factual but it may be worthwhile escalating to FOS or ICO? Will update with transcript details once I’ve raised and received a response to my request. I suppose the upside of this is that I’ll be even more cautious about negative markers in the future. Thanks, J
    • Rwandans claim asylum in Oz. Rwandans arrive in Australia after perilous journey to claim asylum | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Hunters reportedly find five Rwandan men in mangroves on Saibai Island, a known crocodile habitat  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Not allowed to take annual leave for snow day


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5236 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

That's just downright unreasonable ! are they going to provide every employee with a crystal ball for future weather emergencies?

 

So do they have to take it unpaid?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just downright unreasonable ! are they going to provide every employee with a crystal ball for future weather emergencies?

 

So do they have to take it unpaid?

 

Yes it has come from the big boss, he stated today that anybody that was not able to attend work Wednesday was not allowed to claim this time off as annual leave as it was not pre-booked before hand so everyone that was absent from work HAS to take unpaid leave.

 

I think this is disgusting behaivour from a big security company

Edited by taz_in_2001
wrong day stated
Link to post
Share on other sites

was the business open or closed?

 

The place where he works was open because cardiff council is much better then Rhondda council, we live at the top of a steep hill that was like a sheet of glass, we are under around 5 inches of snow, today the sun was lovely but not a drop has melted.

 

Cardiff was fine although they did close early, the other employees were ok because they live in or around cardiff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart from the fact that it's unreasonable - it's a particularly silly move by the employer, hasn't it dawned on him that those who took holiday now have one less day this year that he has to plan for!

 

All employees where I work were allowed to take holiday for the days they couldn't get to work.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Employers will face a sticky wicket if they dont pay as it would be classed as unauthorised deduction from pay and could land employers with an ET claim - that's not my professional advice BTW but an employment lawyer. They have to warn you beforehand that if you took the time off you would not be paid - maybe they should have had a crystal ball as well!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep you are entitled to be paid for the day you took off due to the snow.

 

Heres a post from Elche in another thread that you can locate here.

 

Point A which i have highlighted in red is what would apply to you. There's also some information about using the time as annaul leave too

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by creditcruncha viewpost.gif

If a school is closed due to bad weather, and thus there is no opportunity for a teacher to work, is a teacher entitled to pay for that cancelled day?

 

The current exceptional weather raises interesting questions in employment law.

 

In order to attempt to answer your question it is important to firstly make one point clear.

 

There are 2 circumstances that an employee could face due to the snow:

 

a) I cannot attend my workplace or:

b) I could attend my workplace, and am prepared to do so, but my employer has told me not to because they are shut due to the weather.

 

Point B is clearer - The employee has been 'laid off' for the day. This lay off was either permitted by a term of the contract (or custom and practice), and as such the employee is entitled (as a minimum) only to stat guarantee pay @ £21.50 (or such amount as was specified in relevant term of the contract); or there was no such contractual entitlement, and as such the employee willing and able to attend the workplace should be paid approximately their entire salary due.

 

Point A - Is a moot point, and I have heard a solicitor specialising in employment (a partner nonetheless) on PM radio 4 yesterday and today defend the position that not to pay in such circumstances could be viewed as an unlawful deduction from wages.

 

After hearing this on my way home, I nearly rang in work on to apologise for my poor advice as I had been telling clients all day, 'If an employee does not attend work due to snow, then technically they are in BOC and have no right to payment of wages'

 

I think the point is arguable either way and may depend on how the 'Payment of Wages' clause is worded in your contract, but I still prefer the general position that, 'If your workplace is open on a day you are contractually obliged to attend work, then, should you not attend, then you are in BOC and cannot rely on the same contract to demand wages for that day'

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by creditcruncha viewpost.gif

Normally a (harsh) employer can insist that snow (or similar bad weather) days not worked be taken as annual leave (provided such policy is in the contract, or published in advance);

 

I wouldn't necessarily agree. The employer's position that you allude to would definitely be permissible if the contract provided for such AND the leave that would be taken was contractual entitlement to annual leave above the statutory minimum (i.e. normally those days above 28pa for FT employee)

 

As regards statutory entitlement to annual leave, this can only be imposed if the correct notice is given the '2 for 1 rule' (my phrase). i.e. if an employer wants to force annual leave on an employee that represents part of that employees entitlement to annual leave under the WTR ( i.e. the 28 days for FT worker), they must give that employee twice the notice of the leave they want you to take.

 

Thus if they want you to take 1 week, they must give you 2 weeks notice.

 

Hope this partially helps - and I must add that some issues regarding non-attendance at work due to snow are potentially argued more than one way legally right now, and often may turn on the wording of that particular employee's contract - and as such generalisations are difficult.

 

Che

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...