Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
    • The clock is ticking for savings providers. They now have just a few weeks left to get their act together and start offering loyal customers a good deal.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit card debt and suicidal, please help if you can


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok ok, sorry, have changed it to 'with Prejudice' now.

 

However, hubby is asking surely if there is no 'withOUT prejudice', that means that we can use in court anyway? He thinks that if I put 'with prejudice' it might look like I don't know what I am talking about. Which in my case is true :) but we don't want them to know that!

 

Noooooo, def don't want you to have a heart attack - where would I be without you and your constant help???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok ok, sorry, have changed it to 'with Prejudice' now.

 

However, hubby is asking surely if there is no 'withOUT prejudice', that means that we can use in court anyway? He thinks that if I put 'with prejudice' it might look like I don't know what I am talking about. Which in my case is true :) but we don't want them to know that!

 

Noooooo, def don't want you to have a heart attack - where would I be without you and your constant help???

 

I agree - but your call Nick = your letter

 

M

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All read and sign if you're happy with this>>>>>http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/236823-urgent-issue-has-effected.html Off topic I know, but highly relevant,

 

Thanks,

 

M

Will sign it later as I am still getting over the shock that OP gave me. My hands are all trembling and I am having palpitations. I think I will phone the hospital and ask them to send me a nice good looking blonde nurse to keep an eye on me.

 

On the other hand, I take it you know that with the Lisbon Treaty it is going to change to 3 years instead of 6 years on file with the CRA's?

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

All read and sign if you're happy with this>>>>>http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/236823-urgent-issue-has-effected.html Off topic I know, but highly relevant,

 

Thanks,

 

M

 

 

done, thanks for bringing it to my attention

 

ps is that petition with or without prejudice? only joking;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take your choice. Either keep With Predjuice or delete it. BUT NOT WITHOUT PREDJUICE. Without Predjuice means it cannot be shown in court as evidence.

 

Legal Definition of With Prejudice

 

With Prejudice

 

A statement or order that is conclusive between the parties as to the dispute between them.n letters and documents, the addition of with prejudice represents an admission by the signatory or by the person who tenders the document with prejudice, that the contents are admissible against him or her, particularly if the contents run against that person's interest. In Court orders, the words with prejudice are assumed since a court order is conclusive of the rights of the parties in regards to the issue being thereby resolved. Where these words are added, redundancy notwithstanding, they mean that the order is res judicata.

In Schuster v Northern Co., Justice Freebourn of the Supreme Court of Montana wrote:

"The term
with prejudice
as used in a judgment of dismissal ... is the converse of the term
without prejudice
, and a judgment or decree of dismissal with prejudice is as conclusive of the rights of the parties as if the suit had been prosecuted to a final adjudication adverse to the plaintiff.

"The terms
with prejudice
and
without prejudice
have been recognized as having reference to, and being determinative of, the right to bring a future action."

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The legal meaning of Without Predjuice:

 

Without Prejudice

 

A reservation made on a statement or an offer that it is not an admission or cannot otherwise be used against the issuing party in future dealings or litigation with any determinative legal effect.

A statement set onto a written document such as a letter, which qualifies the signatory as exempt from the content to the extent that it may be interpreted as containing admissions or other interpretations which could later be used against him or her; or as otherwise affecting any legal rights of the principal of, or the person signing.

In Castano v Gabriel, a 1969 residential tenancy case, Justice Wahl of the Civil Court of New York City wrote:

"When a dispute arises between parties and they desire to preserve their respective rights and positions, then such reservation is readily accomplished by the performance of the acts between the parties where such is done
as to the existing controversy. Thus, no determinative legal effect is completed; it is reserved for future determination."

In an 1882 decision, Re Leite, Justice Fry wrote:

"The words
when added to letters, only mean that in the event of the negotiations carried on by those letters not resulting in any agreement, nothing in them is to be taken as an admission. Where letters written
contained an undertaking on certain terms which were agreed to by the other side, and afterwards the parties giving the undertaking wished to introduce a fresh condition, the original undertaking was enforced."

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

what is the Lisbon treaty.

 

Lisbon treaty is the treaty just rectified in the Eu recently signed by the Czeck Republic who were the last to sign. It went through a referendum in Ireland but although a referendum was promised in England it did not happen.

 

The Lisbon treaty basically appoints an EU President (England wanted Tony Blair as candidate but later he stepped down) and Ministers from round the world.

 

In short, our lives are not ours any more but owned by Brussels. Brussels now makes the laws which are supposed to be universal for all EU countries.

 

And I know this and you dont?????? Here is a piece of news for you. Why is my English what is called Queens English and I keep checking posts for typing errors?? :D

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prejudice (legal procedure) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Prejudice (legal procedure)

 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

Jump to: navigation, search

"Without Prejudice" redirects here. For the 2007 game show on Game Show Network, see Without Prejudice?

Within legal civil procedure, prejudice is a loss or injury, and refers specifically to a formal determination against a claimed legal right or cause of action. [1] Thus, in a civil case, dismissal without prejudice is a dismissal that allows for re-filing of the case in the future. The present action is dismissed but the possibility remains open that the plaintiff may file another suit on the same claim. The inverse phrase is dismissal with prejudice, in which the plaintiff is barred from filing another case on the same claim. Dismissal with prejudice is a final judgment and the case becomes res judicata on the claims that were or could have been brought in it. Dismissal without prejudice is not.

[edit] Usage in common law

 

In many common law jurisdictions such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore, the term "without prejudice" is also used in the course of negotiations to indicate that a particular conversation or letter is not to be tendered as evidence in court; it can be considered a form of privilege.[2] This usage flows from the primary meaning: concessions and representations made for purpose of settlement are simply being mooted for that purpose, and are not meant to actually concede those points in litigation.

Such correspondences must be made in the course of negotiations and must be a genuine attempt to settle a dispute between the parties. It may not be used as a façade to conceal facts or evidence from the court and as such a document marked "without prejudice" that does not actually contain any offer of settlement can be submitted should the matter proceed to court. Courts may also decide to exclude from evidence communications not marked "without prejudice" that do contain offers of settlement.[3][4]

The term "without prejudice save as to costs" is a modification to the above and refers to a communication that cannot be exhibited in court until the end of the trial when the court awards costs to the successful party. This is also referred to as the Calderbank formula, from Calderbank v Calderbank (2 All E.R. 333 (1976)),[2] and exists because English courts have held that "without prejudice" includes for the purposes of costs, as in Court of Appeal, in Walker v Wilshire (23 QBD 335 (1889)):

Letters or conversations written or declared to be "without prejudice" cannot be taken into consideration in determining whether there is a good cause for depriving a successful litigant of costs. In the credentialing of Medical professionals a lawsuit settled "Without Prejudice" means that the plaintiff releases the ability to further pursue monetary compensation from the defendent(s) by accepting the settlement.

 

 

 

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?

 

M

I guess it depends what you shot it out off. If you dumped it into an 80mm mortar rocket launcher and fired off a mortar most probably its body will arrive at destination while the feathers will still be floating in front of you. :D:D And most probably its head will finish sticking out of its backside as well........

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yikes Nick, my head is reeling. I can't possibly take in all the info!

 

Looks like your hands have stopped trembling .

 

Well, all my letters are done now, ready to post tomorrow. Its been a strange weekend. I have been obssessed with my debt problem but with the help I have received I have made some headway and can't wait to post these letters off.

 

Just hope the creditors don't turn nasty on me now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ desperadette

 

Right so decided:

 

Barclays: You send a CCA (see post 74 for proper wording. Make sure you use that wording so they cannot try and weasel out. If you read the wording it does not allow them to say "We just bought over the account"). £1 postal order, recorded delivery.

 

Marbles: A nice lovely letter sweet letter with the I+E and a £5 to keep them sweet and hopefully get another year. (We need to see what they reply and take it from there). Send recorded mail so can find out when they got it.

 

Apex: Letter asking for 14 days to "try and find out what can do" (As in A which you said you prefer) and a Christmas Card wishing all the staff a lovely Christmas and a burnt turkey. :D

 

Egg: Letter (Either With Predjuice or remove With Prejuice and send as a normal letter BUT NOT Without Predjuice) as per post #87 sent recorded mail. (to find post number just look on right hand side of each post). Just cut and paste it. Fill in the blanks. You have to sign this one otherwise it is not legal and can be just ignored.

 

You should have at least a week of hearing nothing and peace and enjoyment.

 

Any questions?

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yikes Nick, my head is reeling. I can't possibly take in all the info!

 

Looks like your hands have stopped trembling .

 

Well, all my letters are done now, ready to post tomorrow. Its been a strange weekend. I have been obssessed with my debt problem but with the help I have received I have made some headway and can't wait to post these letters off.

 

Just hope the creditors don't turn nasty on me now.

Can you please check post 116 above and confirm we agree on course of action? Thanks.

 

Creditors cannot turn nasty on you. You are asking for what you are entitled by Law.

 

Look at how it is planned:

 

Marbles: Should be sweet. Can you see why they should be unhappy?

 

Barclays: You are entitled to the information. Have you said "I am not paying you"????? Have you implied it?? No you have not.

 

Apex: Just a nice answer so nothing special. You have not told them you are not paying or anything.

 

Egg what can they do? They have already sold your debt.

 

Have fun and before you go to bed check pm.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

burnt turkey....:D

 

yes, I have followed your instructions and those are the letters I have got.

 

Only thing I changed was that I didn't put 'data controller' in the Barclays one. As I wasn't sure what would happen if

a) there was no one of that title

b) if there was but they were off sick or on leave and then they would use that as an excuse not to reply on time

 

any thoughts? nice ones, I mean...

Link to post
Share on other sites

burnt turkey....:D

 

yes, I have followed your instructions and those are the letters I have got.

 

Only thing I changed was that I didn't put 'data controller' in the Barclays one. As I wasn't sure what would happen if

a) there was no one of that title

b) if there was but they were off sick or on leave and then they would use that as an excuse not to reply on time

 

any thoughts? nice ones, I mean... :D:D

 

Have a good night. Have fun posting the letters tomorrow. And relax. Things have now started to move.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there

 

i was just reading thru your blog and im in the exact same boat....financially. i lost my job, couldnt afford mortage etc etc....had credit cards and their dcas chasing me,phoning me all the flipping time and letters, i thought that the bailiffs would come knocking.

 

ive learnt a hell of a lot thru this site and everyone has been amazing. you will find the strength, courage and even sometimes anger to get you thru it all. i promise you, if i can do it, you can too!!

 

firstly, get cca off all the credit card people, letter templates are on here and people will help you find all the stuff you need.....

 

please keep us posted and am sure we will all get there one today together!! xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi To All

 

Very good craic there from M and Nick, however I dont like to see ' Names' being noted, despedetta I am sure you are feeling a lot better than you were 48 hrs ago, your husband too!

 

Keep posting and keep us informed.

 

Good luck over the next few weeks

 

Mr W

 

ps..Nick your very informative and knowledgable, but slightly overwhelming(imo) and thats good, maybe I can buy you a pint sometime.

 

Only if you promise not to mention the x wife.

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am feeling a lot better re the debt than I was saturday morning.

 

You guys have all been FANTASTIC and I do appreciate the support. It is particularly encouraging from people who have been through similar.

 

I really don't know what I would have done if I hadn't found this site.

 

And I was even motivated to write to Child Tax Credit this afternoon - I was overwhelmed before and couldn't deal with thembut I decided that I might as well. So that's another letter typed and ready to send. Don't expect much to come of it - I expect I will get 3 letters sometime next week all saying different things but that's normal for CTC!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...