Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

what should I do now - if anything


flooz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4862 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Flooz,

 

Typical Crap1 delay tactics!

 

They asked for my signature, sent them one, (as you did, I guess) and they sent me the signed form like you got earlier. Strange thing was the signatures were completely different but no-one checked that day!

 

AND they don't send everything, I have just written back for more information, are you subbing to my thread?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 560
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi Dotty, I shall compose yet another letter to them when I've a moment. Yes, I check your thread, although unfortunately at the moment I've so little time to myself I don't get on here often. TBH, I feel like giving in with Cap1 and just paying the damm thing to stop their tactics, but I guess that's what they're hoping for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Flooz

Cap.1 have been sending statements to your home since the card was issued. Are they now saying that that address is suspicious? You do not have to sign anything. Just print your name.

Drop a letter to the Info Comm regarding the refusal to send an SAR and send Cap.1 a copy.

Other than that just ignore the vultures.

John

 

 

P.S.No news my end yet. Just geeting my act together re- asking the court for a declaration under 142.

Link to post
Share on other sites

John

 

Your right about the signature and they do know who you are but none of mine would send the sars without the signature did report them to the ICO whom haven`t even acknowledged my letters they like all the other governing bodies neither use nor ornament just Civil Servants in a created post which does nothing like it`s supposed to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does this sound guys??

Quote....

Thank you for your letter dated .............. the contents of which are noted

 

In your letter you make reference to my signature not matching the signature you have on file. May I draw your attention to the fact that the Consumer Credit Act 1974 does not require that I supply you a copy of my signature before you comply with my request, and thus your request is unfounded. Indeed you have previously accepted this second signature on correspondence to which you have responded. Moreover, please note that you have been happily sending statements and correspondence containing extensive sensitive private information to this address for some years, and I therefore have to ask, if you have concerns as to whether you are corresponding with the correct person, why has it taken you so long to raise this or indeed why you have cashed the cheque enclosed with my request.

 

As you are aware, disclosing data without adequate checks of identity is contrary to the 7th principal of data protection, listed in schedule 1 of the Data protection Act 1998:

 

7. Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.

 

If it is for Data Protection purposes then I can happily supply you with documentation to substantiate my identity to you.

 

My subject access request for information regarding this account was made on 20th January, I do not believe there is any provision to extend the time limit for your response, even if you are unsure of my identity and I look forward to receiving the documentation requested.

 

Finally, I draw your attention to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls I am receiving from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing and distressing to other members of my family. I have verbally requested these calls to stop with all further communications to be made in writing.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

.....end quote

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good letter I want to find a way of getting my hubbies SARS from MBNA they won`t send them without either passport/driving licence as proof it`s ridiculous I wouldn`t send his passport to anyone and he doesn`t have a driving licence don`t see why if they have been happy ringing you, and writing to your address for years that that isn`t proof enough they have the right person

Edited by Laura Cooke
Link to post
Share on other sites

Check in the library of template letters Laura - there's a letter there for you to use. It's what I based my letter on.

 

On a separate note, does anyone know of anything in the telecommunications act about calls on a Sunday??

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On a separate note, does anyone know of anything in the telecommunications act about calls on a Sunday??

 

I was looking for the same info but tbh I think it fell within the OFT guidelines on debt collection........ reasonable hours etc etc.

 

If I can't find it soon I'll ask on another thread later to see if somebody can point us in the right direction

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

we know the number now Dotty, so don't answer it. Did I remember on your thread that they did eventually give up? If I'm right, approximately how long did the calls continue before they got the message?

 

Thanks for the link Gez, I'll have a peruse later on. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

THE number? I know to at least 7 different ones!

 

Still getting them on a daily basis, CCA requested April last year, sent usual stuff, am looking towards a PPI and charges claim at the moment, waiting for them to confirm previous interest rates.

 

I did manage to get them to stop calling me at work but it took about 3 letters!

They haven't got my mobile. :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL Dotty, at the moment, they're only using the one number to phone us, no doubt that will change sooner or later. I must've read on someone elses thread that they had given up. I know I read it somewhere. There's too many threads on here to keep up with, lol.

 

I shall be sending my letter this week. Let's see what they come up with this time. No doubt I shall be provided with yet another copy of the application form.

 

I do think that acceptance of the cheque indicates they should be accepting the letter, and believe a Court would too. But then again, I've been known to be wrong. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

forgive my ignorance Gez, but what is SD? (I may be just a little dense this morning) ;-)

 

It has also just dawned on me that Cap1 have absolutely no genuine reason to query the signature on my recent letter, indeed the cheque enclosed with it (which has been cashed) quite clearly had the signature on it that they are familiar with. So I have adjusted my letter to reflect this ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I should've worked that out, lol. That's serious isn't it? Anything you can do about that?

 

We're possibly on the verge of bankruptcy anyway, so if Carp1 have any sense, they'll try and do a deal with us ;-) But then again, do they have any sense??? ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fairly confident with set aside, if i think I may c*ck it up I'll pay a sols...... still have the house to protect so best to play safe.

 

Only a partial application for CCA, dodgy DN followed by an even dodgier termination and assignment so if they do test the water on small claims track later on I stand a chance with that as well.... mines over 26k on this card so me thinks they'll spend a few squid chasing it :p

 

Bankruptcy suits some people and gives them a fresh start, have you ever sat down with a specialist to see if it would work to your advantage by inviting a creditor to petition?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not yet Gez, it's still a final option at the moment, but to be honest, the mere word terrifies me. I've never had a situation like this in my life!! At the moment, I'm still hoping that of the 3 creditors, one (Natwest) hasn't a hope in hell's chance, they've admitted no agreement, and despite no payments for 4 months now, I've not heard anything. The second is this one (Cap1) and the third is more difficult, full CA provided, only thing missing is the cancellation option. Haven't done anything about that yet, and may or may not do so. It be my preference to have them all settled at a reduced amount in the not too distant future. But we'll see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never had anything like it either, worked all my life, paid the bills on time and the moment I start to struggle every creditor (with the exception of one) has acted a total ar*e.

 

If they'd shown the slightest sympathy to my financial problems when they were made aware I might not be making them work so hard to get anything out of me now!

 

Rant over :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...