Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Multiple Creditors - Support Please!


Saint2K
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5269 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

These are sections of the Act that require a creditor to sent a copy of the agreement along with some other information. There's a sticky here for the full text of the Act here:http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/statutes-library/27535-consumer-credit-act-1974-a.html#post214254Do read the CCA thread though before taking any action. CheersRosie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello.

 

I posted a similar question on the MSE forums but so far I haven't received any definitive information.

 

I am selling a couple of items to my OH. I want to keep an accurate record and provide my OH with a receipt for these items. This is so that we both have accurate records to show who owns what items.

 

What's the best way to produce a receipt? ... What format should it take?

 

I was thinking of just making a template on Microsoft Word which details the item, description, payment amount and both our signatures.

 

Would this be acceptable?

 

This receipt should be acceptable so that even a Court would accept it.

 

I appreciate your thoughts on this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello.

 

I am running my own self managed DMP and have been now for around a year and a half.

 

Mostly smooth sailing thus far, mainly thanks to sites such as this which are a wealth of information. I have learnt so much over the past twelve months, its amazing!

 

Anyway, I digress from my current problem.

 

One of the DCA that I am dealing with have started 'acting up' and sending me threatening letters. I am fully aware these are a tactic to try and pressure me into paying more.

 

However, based on some advice I received on here, I sent a CCA request to the DCA.

 

This was done with the aim of preventing them from taking any legal action, if there threat was actually serious that is, and obviously only a stop gap solution until they found the CCA.

 

I sent them a further letter quoting harrassment and the Administration of Justice Act 1970 and received an apology.

 

So, the situation seems to have returned to normal. Except, I have yet to receive the CCA.

 

It has been more than 12 days, but has not been more than a month.

 

Should I just forget about the request now, and if there is ever a future threat aof Court action, then I can just mention the fact they have commited a criminal offence by not supplying the information, or should I infact chase this CCA request up?

 

There is conflicting advice on the various threads. Some people say, once you have made the request, just sit back, and others say you should chase it up.

 

I appreciate any advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on whether you enjoy tormenting them or not. You can just sit back and wait for them to default (12 working days from receipt) and then commit an offence (12 working days + 30 calendar days after receipt). Or you can constantly remind them that they are in default (so you don't have to pay them a bean if you don't want to) and are soon to commit a criminal act.

The choice really is yours, the outcome is usually the same - the DCA not being able to produce the agreement.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am in the same situation as youself regarding a CCA, its over 12 days but not yet the additional 30 days. I have decided to sit back and wait the time out. If they don't know the legal timescale...why the hell should I tell them! These DCAs seems to think they are above the law...but they are not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and as they can't produce the agreement (and the DCA probably doesn't own the debt anyway) and the debt is in dispute they can't take you to court. So any threat of court action is just that, an empty threat and you should report them to the OFT if they do this.

I received my first pay up or were taking you court letter over 2 years ago - still waiting on them notifying me of a court date.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zimmie, your quite right it is not your position as the debtor (albeit disputed debtor) to advise the DCA on their legal position - if they don't know it tough.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My personal tactic has been to wait until they go over the 12wd+30day deadline then to write and make a formal complaint.

 

Under the new FOS rules they have to follow it up, but if they couldn't get the CCA within the timescale I'd be surprised if they could suddenly magic one up just because I complained.

 

To be honest, if they can get a copy I'd rather know about it now than have a nasty surprise if it ever got to court.

 

There's some childish satisfaction to be gained from telling a DCA that their blatent disregard for the Consumer Credit Act leads me to call into question their suitability to hold a licence, and that I will be reporting my concerns to the statutory authorities.

 

After all the ****ty letters they've sent me over the years, it's nice to send some equally ****ty ones back. (Snotty, that is, obviously ;) )

 

I don't believe we should be letting them get away with it. Every day since joining here I read of DCAs failing to comply with the CCA. If we all reported them, every time, the authorities would be forced to act.

 

Anyway.... that's dragged the thread well off into another discussion, so to answer the OP: it's your personal choice! You're right that no agreement = no enforcable debt, but personally I'd push them so that I know what I might be dealing with in the future.

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hello.

 

I received an A5 sized letter through my door this morning from CapQuest stating that they intended to visit my home to discuss my account.

 

This has arrived out of the blue, considering I am running my own self managed DMP and have been for two years and I have a repayment agreement in place with them.

 

Obviously it has either been automatically generated and sent out in error, or they do in fact intend to visit.

 

Either way it is unacceptable to me and normally I would write them a formally worded letter stating that any visit would breach the Administration of Justice Act 1970 considering I am in a repayment arrangement.

 

However, I have more ammo on this occassion as I sent a CCA request to CapQuest well over three months ago and never received a reply. So obviously they are in breach of that request and I believe they are now commiting a criminal offence?

 

I was wondering therefore if anyone could point me in the direction of a template letter which basically states they are in breach of my original request and therefore the agreement is un-enforcable, plus they are also commiting a criminal offence.

 

I want to hit them with as much as possible.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another DCA scare tactic.

They will most likely NOT be visiting at all and even if they do you don't have to talk to them at all.

 

Oh dear what a shame I wonder if CrapQuest can spell UNENFORCEABLE ;)

 

Wait until they send a letter demanding payment, then make a report to Trading Standards.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Yes, I completely agree, this is blatently a scare tactic, but I still need to address their incompetence.

 

Is there any template letter that would cover what I mentioned in my first post?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give this a try.

Edit as needed:

Account In Dispute.

Dear Sirs,

 

Your Ref::::

 

Further to your letter dated xxx, please be advised that the above account is now in dispute. I am awaiting the fulfillment of my CCA request dated .... , as is my right under the Credit Consumer Act 1974.

 

Please be advised that this debt is unenforceable whilst in dispute and any action taken by yourselves will be vigorously defended. Furthermore, not only will any action by you be defended, but take note that I will issue a counterclaim for stress and damages.

 

I am frankly shocked by the contents of you letter, which uses the term 'we will send bailiffs'. I am forwarding a copy of your letter to Trading Standards with an official complaint as your abuse of power is obviously intended to intimidate. As you are well aware, you do not have the authority to send bailiffs without a court order.

 

It is also my belief that your continued pursuance of this matter also constitutes an

offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I trust this now clarifies my position.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you send a CCA request to a creditor and/or DCA, and they fail to provide the requested documents within the allowed timeframe, would making further repayments to the aforementioned creditor/DCA nullify your request for a CCA as theoretically you are admitting liability by continuing with repayments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SS - what I've found has happened in my cases is that the DCA have wirtten to say they'll go back to the OC to obtain the credit agreement. They've never managed to get it though.;)

 

I would start the countdown from the time the letter is received by the DCA.

 

Hope this helps.

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under s175 of CCA 74, if a DCA is acting as agent for the OC then all requests/payments must be passed to the OC.

For CCA requests the clock starts when they receive your request OR 2 days after you posted it.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, after a little searching of the website, I am still a little confused.

 

I want to send a CCA request to my bank, but there are varying threads and opinions on if you can do this or not.

 

Can anyone clarify?

 

 

 

P.S. Is there an overdraft specific CCA template on CAG?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...