Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • for the sake of history, i've merged your old sadly failed charges reclaim court claim. have they ever sent you a default notice regarding this mortgage? dx  
    • I am financially at  point where I can see the light at the end of the tunnel regarding my debts. I have one remaining and I am interested to see what my options could be. I have be in contact with the Citizen’s Advice Bureau and the National Debt Helpline, but their advice has been a little more generic (but still helpful). This debt is 12 years old and is now owing around £3k. It was a bank loan and has been passed to several creditors over the years. A payment plan has always been in place and is up to date. I get statements every 6 months. There has never been a CCJ. I have been sent the letters advising of change of ownership. Following my own review of my finances, I decided to contact the current creditor to see if they have a copy of the credit agreement. I regarded this as due diligence as the debt has been sold on several times. The creditor updated me several times saying they had requested the document from the original lender. After 12 months of this they wrote to me saying they had not received it but were still waiting and would send it once received. The last letter was over 6 months ago. I then submitted a freedom of information request to the current and original creditor. The original creditor supplied one, but the current one did not include one in the pack they sent me. I went back to them to ask specifically about this as it was what I requested in my request. They replied saying the debt was sold to them as one without the credit agreement and they did not have it. They have requested it above, so I believe that means they cannot obtain it either for the FOI request. I contacted the original creditor and exercised my ‘right to be forgotten’, under the Data Protection Act, which they have complied with. I also got my up to date credit file and this debt is not showing on it with the current creditor or any others. I contacted the creditor and made them an early settlement offer. They do have an early settlement offer in place on their portal, but I was advised to try to get a reduction via negotiation. I have not heard back from them yet, but I understand through a separate upheld compliant it has or will be refused. Due to this complaint and the creditor putting the account on hold I had stopped payments, and advised them of this. To date, they have not contacted me about resuming payments since the complaint is resolved, but it has only been a few weeks. I am annoyed that they were not honest with me about not having the credit agreement, because that is not being transparent and I understood they should tell you if they do not have it.   I have two questions (but am open to anything else anyone would like to add): 1) Based on the above, does anyone think this account enforceable? I do not think it is? 2) Does anyone have any suggestions on how to proceed? I could resume payments and then settle early. If the above had not happened, I may have just done that. Thank you for any help or input anyone can provide. It is appreciated.
    • The main thing is to stop shoplifting because it could be worse next time. If you think you have mental health issues that led you to do this, please go and have a chat with your GP. They won't judge you and should be able to get you help if you need it. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS! (Newbie vs BCW - again!)


86.dll
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, so, to quickly recap up to this point:

 

1) Buchanan Clark & Wells asks me £280 pound for two years (2007-2009) of unpaid gas bills, but I was not in the flat any longer since 2007.

 

2) I send them the "prove it" letter, as you guys of this forum suggested me to do.

 

3) They ignore my letter and start threatening me with Legal Actions, saying that I made no attempt to contact them.

 

4) I send them the "prove it" letter AGAIN, this time with RECORDED DELIVERY.

 

5) They send me back the copy of a meaningless gas estimate with my name on it, which is their "proof" of my liability. You can see it here.

 

6) I send them another letter by RECORDED DELIVERY, stating that I no longer was in the flat for the period they want me to pay the gas for. To prove this I attach two documents: the Tenancy Agreement that I signed upon entering a new flat in 2007 and a bank statement of that period that shows my new address.

I also point out that a simple gas meter reading with somebody's name on it does not prove that they were present at that particular property at that time, and it does not make them liable to pay anything.

And, as you guys on this forum showed me, I also pointed out that a gas company cannot bill for any amount which dates back longer than a year.

 

(If you guys wanna see my whole reply, I can post it)

 

7) Today I find another reply from them saying again that, AS A CONSEQUENCE OF MY FAILURE TO CONTACT THEM, they are ready to prepare documents for the Issue of a Claim against me in COURT. They say they will also proceed with a PERSONAL VISITATION by a DEBT INVESTIGATION OFFICER to my house.

 

 

These guys even ignored my RECORDED DELIVERY letter with all the proof that I wasn't in their damn flat anymore! They just keep going and going without listening to anything at all!! I seriously don't know what I can do more than this. I'm just so angry at them, asking me £280 pounds and harassing me, and when I send them proof that I don't have to pay a cent, they keep ignoring me and threatening me with all these legal actions!!!

 

You guys tell me what I'm supposed to do now, because I really don't know anymore.

 

(By the way: thanks for the help so far!)

Edited by 86.dll
edit because of bypassing swear filter.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a letter via recorded delivery, of all the dates you will be available to go to court, tell them that you gladly welcome seeing them in court and will be extremely grateful of some of their money they will have to pay you in damages for their neolithic incompetence.

 

Complete and utter morons!:mad:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Boo, thanks for your very quick reply, but to be honest, I don't really wanna go in court, even if I'm right! I don't have any experience in any kind of legal thing. I would just be an easy prey I think. Plus, I'm Italian, my English is ok but with all the technical words used in this business, I'm sure I wouldn't even be able to understand what's going on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not too worry, I was being rather flippant, sorry!:oops:

 

So a bit more constructive advise for you, for the threat of a door step collector you should print off the following link, and use the advise given;

Give them the template letter linked below through the letterbox or chained door.

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resour...ep-visit-.html

 

Tell them to leave as you have nothing to discuss and all communication must be in writing.

 

Tell them you will call the police if they don't leave immediately.

 

Remain calm and polite at all times.

 

Walk away from the door so the visitor cannot try and talk to you.

 

If they don't leave, call the police to report that you are being harassed and the visitor refuses to leave.

 

You can either send them a copy of the letter, or just keep one by your front door, IF and it is a very big IF they do decide to send a stranger round.

 

Personally I would tell them to send you a copy of their complaints procedure, and then follow it through to it's conclusion, where you will be able to escalate your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman, Just had a quick look on their website, and apart from blowing smoke up their own, there is nothing where you are able to raise a complaint.

 

We take our responsibilities seriously

 

I can't believe your still having aggro over this!

Have you lodged a formal complaint with Ofgem Home

If not do it this weekend.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delayed reply Boo, I just really had to go to eat something.

 

Anyway, thanks for the link to the letter, I will print it, however, I just rent a room in a house, I don't have a place completely on my own. The point is that, if somebody shows up and just asks about me, the couple that has their room right next to the front door might just let the person in and send them to me. (I'll try to tell them not to even if they are unbelievably unfriendly!)

 

Oh, and I checked the BCW link "We take our responsibilities seriously", and if you actually click on the "here" of "We have signed up to the requirements contained within the Credit Services Association code of conduct, which can be viewed here", the browsers gives Error 404, Page not Found! I guess that already shows how seriously they take their responsibilities. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is rare anyone will just turn up and collect your door step, but if they do and are let into the property, when you open your door, you simply tell them to go away as you have nothing to say to them, and all correspondence must be in writing, and shut the door.

 

It really does depend on how well you get on with other couple, and whether you tell them or not, the other alternative is to simply tell your friends that if they are coming round to visit to ring you first so that you are expecting them, and tell the couple under no circumstances should they allow anyone in that asks for you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now, this is weird. I just found today another letter from BCW. This one is of the 19th November, yesterday's one was 25th November. I don't know why I found this one only now. Anyway, this is what it says.. it doesn't make much sense for me:

 

"I write with regard to your recent communication concerning the above account and would advise that I require further information to show that you are not liable for this debt.

 

Please provide a copy of the tenancy agreement relating to your stay at [...]. This should include documentation confirming the date you left the property and the meter readings at the start and end of your tenancy.

 

If you let the property to another party we require a copy of the agreement, the meter readings and evidence of when the tenancy ended. If you are acting for the owner of the property we also require evidence that you are acting in this capacity for the owner.

 

If the property was privately owned we will need documentation showing the date the property was sold and the meter readings at the time.

 

If no meter readings are supplied the client may need to estimate the final bill."

 

...

Now, what does it mean that they advise that they require further information to show me that I am not liable for this debt?

And they want my tenancy agreement for the saying at that flat, but I don't have it anymore.. and I don't even think that tenancy agreement included the day I left the flat on it.

Regarding the meter readings, we never had any, we just paid the bills.

I don't understand what they mean by "acting for the owner", but I wasn't the owner, neither I acted for them, so I guess that part just doesn't apply to me...

 

So essentially, they want my tenancy agreement, and I don't have it. Oh, and they advise that they require further information to show me that I am not liable for this debt. Whatever that means.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Agreed, it is BCW who have to prove to you, that there is indeed a debt, you do not have to show them anything to the contrary.

 

The account is in dispute, therefore continuing with collection activity is against the OFT debt collection guidelines, they are aware of this, so there is not a cat in hells chance of them ever taking you to court over this.

 

It is simply another case of you having corresponded with them, so now they are hopeful of extorting money from you.

 

Ignore them, file the letters under 'jokers' and spend your postage on complaining to the OFT, FOS, CSA, and you can also make a complaint to the Association of Credit Collection Professionals, which they are a part of;

How to File an Ethics Complaint - ACA International

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dare I say I think you are being too nice with them, which is seen as 'encouragement to harass' by their warped little brains. I had a similar situation with a DCA a couple of years ago.

 

They also know that you dont want to go to court which is why they keep threatening but never do. Write to them and simply say I have sent proof that I was not at that address after xx/xx/07 and that I have no liability in this matter. If you are not satisfied then I suggest you begin county court action which will at the very least allow me to use cpr 31.14 and cpr 18 to see what, if any, documentary evidence you have that there is even the slightest possibility that I owe you anything.

 

I will not respond to you threats again, nor will I be intimidated. It is for you to provide definitive legally enforceable proof that I have ANY matter I need to discuss with you. Until you provide such proof I will not respond again.

 

Any further communication without proof of a matter to discuss will be deemed harassment

 

I trust my position in this matter is now clear

 

- that's what I'd send

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...