Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I just found a couple abandoned traffic cones locally by some bins.   A bit squished but free!  So have placed them on the land.  Will wait to see if the cones get moved and signs ignored again this week before I consider rocks/ boulders.
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

does my boyfriend have to declare my wages


susiemac77
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5315 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I live in my boyfriends house and pay him rent. His is the only name on the mortgage and utilities and we have no joint finances whatsoever

 

He has just been made redundant and will be given contribution JSA for 6 months

 

We are worried that me having a job will stop him getting any benefits if he doesnt get a job after 6 months (I have a lot of debt to pay off and have little or no spare cash left each month as it is even after arranging reduced payments to my creditors)

 

Would I automatically be classed as his "partner" as we live at the same address or could he legitimately claim as a single person as long as he declares the rental income he gets from me (which would barely cover the mortgage)

mbna - no agreement provided - settled for 31% of balance!

halifax - no enforceable agreement - account held

Link to post
Share on other sites

Susiemac

 

As your boyfriend's JSA is contribution based for the first six months (i.e. not means tested) the fact that you are living together will not affect the amount of benefit he receives. However, after that it will be assessed on the household income and that will mean that your salary will be taken into account (not the sum that you consider you are paying him as "rent"). You would have to represent yourselves to the DWP as being in a commercial landlord-tenant situation when in truth you are a couple in a relationship similar to that of man and wife (or a couple in a civil partnership). My advice - don't lie, not worth the risk, you will be telling DWP that you are landlord/tenant and everybody else that you are boyfriend/girlfriend - and I don't mean just your family and friends; think what you tell insurance companies, employers, banks etc. If you get caught out you will be prosecuted and could end up with a criminal record for fraud. Sorry to be so blunt but best to be truthful. Hopefully your boyfriend will have some luck in finding another job - good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your boyfriend if he has no mortgage protection policy could apply for help towards payment of his mortgage after thirteen weeks of being on JSA. If he does apply for help then he would have to declare your earnings and this will effect any help he would have got towards his mortgage.

 

It is unlikely that he will qualify for help towards the mortgage from the state as his partner's earnings are likely to be over the threshold for a means-tested benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't say if you have any children but I would recommend that you apply for tax credits from HMRC - the new name for the combined Inland Revenue and Customs & Excise Dpts - once your partner's JSA ends. Even if you have no children you may be entitled to Tax Credits depending on your income so well worth considering

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

we dont have kids but wont get tax credits on my income but doesnt take into account that Im already struggling to repay my debt and if I have to pay all the bills including a mortgage that isnt mine, we are going to struggle very badly and im going to have to renegotiate my debt repayments and im worried that covering my boyfriends mortgage and bills wont be classed as a good enough reason by my creditors

 

as I said before we have NO joint commitments or bank accounts. We live in the same house but have never relied on each other for payments and while I understand joint income rules I think its a little unfair that Im just getting my debt repayments into a manageable state and my boyfriend who has worked and paid NI and tax for 18 years isnt entitled to a little bit more support from the government - means testing doesnt work when it only looks at topline salary without taking actual disposable cash into account

 

PS i wasnt trying to commit benefit fraud, just looking for a legitimate way to make a bad situation a little better

mbna - no agreement provided - settled for 31% of balance!

halifax - no enforceable agreement - account held

Link to post
Share on other sites

we dont have kids but wont get tax credits on my income but doesnt take into account that Im already struggling to repay my debt and if I have to pay all the bills including a mortgage that isnt mine

Well, unless you move out into your own property the state will look at joint income. A mortgage is a priority whereas credit debt is regarded as a non-priority, you should always try and pay a mortgage above and beyond credit debt.

im worried that covering my boyfriends mortgage and bills wont be classed as a good enough reason by my creditors

They shoul dappreciate that a mortgage is more important than a debt.

 

while I understand joint income rules I think its a little unfair that Im just getting my debt repayments into a manageable state and my boyfriend who has worked and paid NI and tax for 18 years isnt entitled to a little bit more support from the government - means testing doesnt work when it only looks at topline salary without taking actual disposable cash into account

 

I appreciate where you're coming from but the state looks at things as a joint unit unfortuneately.

 

It might be worth having a read through the National Debtline self-help pack:

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

My apologies, it was not my intention in any way to infer that you were going to commit benefit fraud. At the end of the day creditors want their money back and I do think that renegotiation of your debts with help from the likes of the CAB etc would be the best avenue but, in reply to your original query, I am afraid I cannot see any legitimate way your boyfriend would be able to claim income based benefit whilst you are living together as a couple. Hopefully your boyfriend will be fortunate in securing employment soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My apologies, it was not my intention in any way to infer that you were going to commit benefit fraud. At the end of the day creditors want their money back and I do think that renegotiation of your debts with help from the likes of the CAB etc would be the best avenue but, in reply to your original query, I am afraid I cannot see any legitimate way your boyfriend would be able to claim income based benefit whilst you are living together as a couple. Hopefully your boyfriend will be fortunate in securing employment soon.

 

Hi Susiemac

 

I think the best way forward for you and your boyfriend would be to sit down and work out how much disposable income is left from both your incomes, after secured debt, priority debt e.g. council tax and expenses e.g. food is taken into account. The sum left over should be apportioned to your unsecured debtors and credit card debt and letters sent with offers of reduced monthly payments. A breakdown of your income and expenses will also need to be sent. Mention to them that a review will be undertaken every 6 months and if your boyfriend has found a job payments could possibly be increased. There are letters and an income breakdown on this forum under the templates section.

 

Good luck to your boyfriend on the job front.

 

JAC

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth having a read through the National Debtline self-help pack:

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice

 

Lets change that to:

 

National Debtline Scotland – Free Debt Advice & Debt Management Tools

 

;-)

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Susiemac77

 

In your original posting you mention about automatically being classed as his partner.

The following may be of interest to you :-

 

Thread Anyone interested in Decision Maker's Guide

Choose Contents Volume 3

Choose Chapter 11.

 

This information shows basically what the DWP would be looking at when deciding on a Living Together situation.

 

I'm not going to make assumptions about mortgage size, earnings etc but with regards to claiming JSA Income Based if you work 24 hours per week or more on average then the conditions of entitlement as a couple would not be met.

 

Cheers MelissaTeddyBear

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...