Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

forthcoming tribunal advice!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been employed by argos for 7 years.

On wed last week i was called into the office by my store manager without prior notice to see the head of our profit protection team.

She said that transactions with my staff number discount had flagged up by the computer system they use.

On the 28/09/09 i went to an argos extra store to purchase a rug which would've taken 4 days to order in to the store i work. I had with me a sat nav which i purchased in january which was faulty so i needed to get a refund on that first. I didn't have the original receipt but the argos catalogue number was on the box,the member of staff who served me called the customer services manager to authorise the refund. As i didnt have the receipt i got back the lowest selling price onto a gift card plus i had my staff discount taken off therefore i got back less than what i paid.

What has now come up is there isn't a record of the original sale so they put it to me that i didn't buy the item from argos.

I said i am 100% sure that i did buy it from argos and i remembered the date i bought as the next day was my husbands birthday. I also said i do not know any of the staff at ashford personally and the catologue number was on the box otherwise the manager would not have done the refund at all. they are acusing me of not buying the sat-nav in store? this looks like in their eyes i frauduently got fe-fund via their store.

I was told i could possibly be facing a disciplinary hearing and would be notified in due course.

My store manager rang me yesterday on my day off to inform me the hearing is on the 10th November at the store where i work and the store manager and customer services manager from another store would do the hearing. I was told i could have someone with me.

i am 100% honest and could relly do with some advice :Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well first of all they need to inform you in writing about the hearing not just by phoning you.

 

Could it be that they have only checked the records for the ashford store and are assuming you purchased it from that store? if you had actually purchased the Sat-Nav from another store. then they would have to check the records at the store you purchased it from to be certain that an offence has occured, before taking any action against you.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have told argos i bought the sat-nav from the folkestone store where i work using my staff discount, they are saying there is no record of my staff discount number being used on that day? which would link me to a sat-nav being purchased that day. but they had to use the cat number on the sat-nav box i returned proving it was originally a argos item?

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you pay by cash or card?

 

do argos keep cctv?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

last x-mas i bought a toy hoover for my niece from argos and threw away the reciept, it didnt work x-mas day so i took it back without the reciept and as the box had the code on they accepted it as being bought in argos and exchanged it no probs. just because your an argos employee why shouldnt you be able to be given the same treatment as other customers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look up the Acas guide to discipline in the work place. Then at least one person in the room will know the correct procedures.

A phone call is insufficient, intended disciplinary action must be detailed in writing.

Take a collegue you trust, or better a union rep with experience.

It occurs to me that any wrong doing from what you describe is really the responsibility of tyhe person who gave you the refund as you are merely a customer at that point.

Unless of course your manager intends to take action against both of you believing collusion has taken place?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to your boss and ask him to state in writing before the meeeting how many sat navs were sold in local stores 14 days before the date you claimed you bought it and 14 days after the same date. If your boss is unable to provide that information ask him to cancel the meeting meeting until you have that information. Hopefully with this information you should be able to prove that you did buythe SatNav from Argos.

 

Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you paid for the Sat Nav with a debit or credit card and you know roughly when then it will show on your bank statement as an Argos purchase

 

 

Regards

Lilylou

Regards

 

LilyLou

 

 

 

 

 

If I have been helpful please tip my scales

 

Any advice/comments I give are based solely on personal experience, if in doubt please consult an expert.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...