Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GMAC Customers read this


Bona
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4545 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Bona your link not working, try this one :)Lender to repay 46,000 borrowers

A quote from the BBC report;

......Another three lenders are being investigated by the FSA over similar failings. The consumers association Which? demanded they be identified. ......."This raises serious questions about the amount of time the enforcement process has taken, given that the FSA has known about these problems since mid 2008."

 

 

Any guesses who the other 'three' lenders are?

1. Capstone (Southern Pacific, Preferred )

2.

3.

 

 

Regards

Regards

 

on*the*case

 

Never Give Up! Never Surrender!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably, if your account was sold on to another lender by GMAC and your new lender is still levying these charges, then your new lender should refund these charges too.

 

Is this a valid claim to send to your new lender?

 

anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - Just found this elsewhere on the web - it is from the GMAC statement following FSA fines:

 

Previous Customers

Repossessed Customers with no debt outstanding (without shortfall) Customers who have redeemed their mortgage or Customers whose loan was sold to another lender. As you no longer hold a mortgage with us, but had these charges applied to your account while you did, please can you contact us on freephone 0800 030 4662. Once we have verified your identity and current address, we will send a cheque to you for any amount due. We will write to you at your last known address on up to three occasions in an attempt to get this message to you. For previous customers only refunds in excess of £10 total of fees and charges, plus interest will be made. If you have moved from that address hopefully the letter will be forwarded to you. If you have not received a letter by (30th November) and feel you are due a refund or have any queries please call freephone 0800 030 4662.

We want to apologise to customers affected. GMAC-RFC has taken this matter very seriously and worked openly with the FSA to review and revise our procedures for managing customers in arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't know what is going on with GMAC but they have not deducted this months mortgage. My direct debit is still active and payments go out at the end of each month, today is the 4th Nov 09 and my mortgage has not been deducted.

 

I received a letter last month that I was in arrears of £50 and I am not in any arrears at all that I can guarantee. I don't know what's going here. I am on an interest only mortgage no thanks to my mortgage broker who totally botched up my mortgage. I had to remortgage to pay off my OH's bankruptcy debt and the mortgage broker put me on an interest only mortgage and I don't think I will ever be able to come off as I am on Income Support.

 

Can this situation get any more sad or worse?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi!

Quick question from me :)

Will it only be charges between October 2004 and October 2008 that will be eligible for refunds? I had arrears with them between February 2008 until July 2009 (when they sold my mortgage to Webb Resolutions). They also took me to court in August 2008 for repossession but as I agreed to £400 extra per month on top of my mortgage they agreed to go for a suspended possession order. I was still getting charged the same arrears charges from February until December 2008 at least!! The first letter showed I had over £1800 in charges from GMAC when my account was transferred - £500 from court case, the rest for unpaid DD charges and arrears charges. Will it only be the arrears charges that are considered?

If they have decided that the customers in arrears were not treated fairly does this mean the suspended possession order could be set aside? Any ideas?

Thanks

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If they have decided that the customers in arrears were not treated fairly does this mean the suspended possession order could be set aside? Any ideas?

 

Thanks

 

x

 

You might have a case to challenge the SPO if the arrears charges were included in the total arrears figure they claimed you owed in court

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stressed2009

I rang the GMAC 0800 number and gave them my new correspondence address. The recorded message is clear(ish) about refunds. Charges for bounced DDs (while in arrears), arrears charges and solicitor costs over and above the 'actual' cost.

I plan to wait until I have their offer and cheque, and then request a full breakdown of the account and all charges, and move from there.

Regards

 

on*the*case

 

Never Give Up! Never Surrender!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant wait to get home tonight dig out the statement I received from them with the breakdown of all the fees applied to our account! So I can have a quick check over see what I think the amount should be.

 

on*the*case - I think you've got a good idea there I dont want to be accepting their offer unless it is the true and full amount I am entitled to. I am still struggling now after being made redundant and any money I get will help me pay the last payment before my mortgage comes off the high fixed rate I am currently on :)

 

I will definitely have a look into the SPO and associated paperwork tonight. I was reading the statement and FSA findings and I was NEVER offered the chance to see a Field Councillor to discuss my arrears! And they would not allow me to capitalise my arrears or offer any solutions other than a ridiculously high additional payment and suspended possession order. I do not feel they treated me fairly!

 

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

......on*the*case - I think you've got a good idea there I dont want to be accepting their offer unless it is the true and full amount I am entitled to. ......I was reading the statement and FSA findings and I was NEVER offered the chance to see a Field Councillor to discuss my arrears! And they would not allow me to capitalise my arrears or offer any solutions other than a ridiculously high additional payment and suspended possession order. I do not feel they treated me fairly!

 

Regarding accepting their offer, a lot depends on any conditions GMAC attach to the offer. Keep your eyes peeled on this site, as when the offers start arriving there will be much posting and advice.

GMAC played hardball with me, no negotiation, no application for possession. The moment the arrears reached 3 months, I received a pay in full in 7 days or else letter, the moment that deadline expired an LPA Receiver was appointed (the mortgage was a BTL). The Receiver immediately listed the property for auction. I had less than 4 weeks to complete a remortgage, it was fortunate that the LTV was 50%, and it was completed with only hours to spare.

 

 

 

The advice from Ell-enn in the post above is good regarding possible grounds for challenging the original SPO. Ell-enn is someone who knows their stuff:)

 

Good Luck

Regards

 

on*the*case

 

Never Give Up! Never Surrender!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest they only came to an agreement with me about 2 days before the court date, and even then only on the basis that I made the amount we had agreed as a payment BEFORE the court hearing otherwise they would go for full possession. God knows how I found the £1620 but somehow I did but it meant family helping me out. Really they could have helped us a lot more than they ever tried to.

 

Oh my god that sounds awful! I bet it was very stressful for you.

 

I am wondering what they will offer, I guess I will have to wait and see.

 

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

subbing to this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgages-secured-loans/229764-gmac-i-want-my.html

 

can a mod join this thread together

:rolleyes:

 

Im very intrested in trying to reclaim erp and

 

 

If they have decided that the customers in arrears were not treated fairly does this mean the suspended possession order could be set aside? Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am keeping a very close eye on this been doing a lot of reading today and some websites are saying that refunds will not be given for arrears fees (£50 per month), failed DD fees (£30 per time), solicitors instruction fee (£60) and several others as they were found to be fair!?

 

I dont know if I am allowed to link to other websites so havent, but it says their information is directly from the FSA and it is only the fee for were a customer is in arrears with no DD set up and there is no payment made for the month!!!

 

I might contact the FSA directly to query this as I had my hopes up that it would be the arrears fee :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant remember what fees I had from them, my mortgaged was moved in Nov 2007. Up until very recently my finances were all over the place and they did take me to court for repossession but court ruled for suspended order of possession so still have the property.

 

I am truly hoping that I can get something back from them as it would be a blessing in disguise and hope that these other subprime lenders get a kick up their rear ends too!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, if you still have a mortgage with them you won't actually see any money in your hand. The charges will be taken off the outstanding mortgage (where they should have been added).

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - re GMAC and their refunds - I thought I heard in the radio statement about it that they should be refunding the difference between the actual cost and what was charged for things like insurances also so to my mind that should include the Mort. Ind. Guarantee fees too - I will be writing to the FSA today about this item. The MIG insurance is another money making vehicle and I want to see the policy costs as so far it has not been disclosed in any previous SAR - there answer being that it is for them so its not relevant but OH NO it is relevant as it is we the customer who pays it! Off to read the statements from FSA. Will advice any else I find. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

what does anyone think about the likes of SPML/Capstone being investigated by FSA I understand 3 others are, is there anyway to find out????

 

Odds on for investigation.

The senior management may even be 'assisting' the FSA right now.;)

Its unlikely that we will know for sure until the FSA announce it.

 

 

Remember that if you have a current mortgage with Preferred/SPML managed by Capstone any refund will be via a credit to your mortgage account.

Regards

 

on*the*case

 

Never Give Up! Never Surrender!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - did I hear that there is an appeal in court today re Southern Pacific??

 

Re GMAC - does anyone know about the GMAC mortgs. sold to others on the same contract and being operated in the same way re penalties etc - e.g. will we have a case against them since they are doing exactly the same thing as GMAC and in my case whacked me for over £6k in legal costs when they neednt have gone into court at all - and charging me extras all the time - and now trying to repo again for a few hundred in missed payments of charges and allowed the solicitor to charge extra £2,000 after the hearings and costs sets by jjudge???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...