Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Child Sponsorship Advice


quisling
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not so much 'Did you know...?' as 'Do you know....?'

 

I've asked my kids to sponsor a child in a developing country instead of buying me a birthday present this year.

They're happy to do so, but we're struggling to work out which charity to go with.

Do any of you have experience of this, or any links to somewhere which gives an unbiased overview of the different organisations?

I'd prefer to go with a non religious charity if possible.

Thanks.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

what an absolute brilliat idea and well done

 

unfortunatley i don't but would probarbly prefer on of the bigger and recognised charities

 

i know that save the children are non profit and you can actaully donate to a village to help the children in that village rather than just one child

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if you must do this then you should look at the corporate information on the charity before coming to a conclusion. They are in it for the money and pay massive saleries. Oxfam boss had a £26,000 payrise a couple of years ago to add to the already massive salary commanded.

 

I refuse to give to any overseas, so called, charities, only local like Lifeboat, Air Ambulance, Poppy, Help for Heroes and local Hospices because of what I have seen ref the above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I refuse to give to any overseas, so called, charities, only local like Lifeboat, Air Ambulance, Poppy, Help for Heroes and local Hospices because of what I have seen ref the above.

 

Obviously your perogative.

I also support the RNLI as well as my local neonatal unit where both my children were born and cared for for the first few months of their lives.

I'm hoping we'll all get something out of sponsoring a child as a long term project, and I'm sure I won't miss all those bubbly baths and boxes of chocolates if I can feel reasonably confident that a child somewhere is not going to bed hungry and uneducated because of our efforts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would contribute if it was in goods and not money, I don't mind sending a can of beans, that is not so likely to be pilfered by the so called charity.

 

We do all get something out of sponsoring a child, it's just that some get more than others and it's not the child. You will also get pestered with mail asking you to up your contribution so much so that they become a nuisance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously your perogative.

I also support the RNLI as well as my local neonatal unit where both my children were born and cared for for the first few months of their lives.

I'm hoping we'll all get something out of sponsoring a child as a long term project, and I'm sure I won't miss all those bubbly baths and boxes of chocolates if I can feel reasonably confident that a child somewhere is not going to bed hungry and uneducated because of our efforts.

 

As an example, out of every £1 donated to Oxfam, only something incredible like 8 pence makes it to Africa. All the rest is swallowed up in jollys and wages for the chief executives.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an example, out of every £1 donated to Oxfam, only something incredible like 8 pence makes it to Africa. All the rest is swallowed up in jollys and wages for the chief executives.

 

I'd be interested in seeing a link to that information please.

(Not that Oxfam do child sponsorship anyway, but I don't think you should post 'facts' that can't be verified).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read The Charity Commission's report on their accounts and the Intelligent Giving website's summary and still can't find where it says only 8p in the £1 gets to Africa.

 

I'd be really grateful if you could show me.

 

Thanks in anticipation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sponsor a child here . Mods I hope its ok to post a link . If not please remove and sorry .

 

Save Children | Sponsor and Support Child Rescue Charity Organization in Goa

 

I have visited my sponsor child a few times up to a year or two ago and met the people who care for her and spent time in the house where the children live and are cared for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I once saw a brilliant way of working out if a charity really needed my money - someone had calculated how long various charities could carry on with their work if no further money came in. As I remember, Guide Dogs for the Blind were sitting on such huge reserves that they wouldn't run out of money for many years and at the other extreme tiny local charities like hospital radio stations were existing week to week.

 

Does anyone know if there is a current website with this information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's the Intelligent Giving site which gives a fairly objective overview, as far as I can tell -

Independent ratings and reviews of charities | Intelligent Giving

 

and obviously the Charity Commission website, where you can look up detailed accounts etc -

 

Charity Commission Homepage

 

 

Unfortunately Conniff hasn't posted me that link yet.

As far as I can see, Barbara Stocking, the CEO of Oxfam earns around £90,000, which although it looks like a lot, is less than the principle of a medium sized secondary school or a GP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, cant give u a link to an overview website but you may want to take a look at this child sponsorship charity

SOS Children: The World's Largest Orphan Charity

Unfortunately last year one of our colleagues tragically died and we decided to sponsor a child in her honour.

The research done was so that like you we gave ALL our money to the child and not to the the charities wage-fund!

Hope this helps. Kindest regards A

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...