Mmm....

Tut-tut, don't try to patronise me, you just know you are wrong regarding the prosecution age in Scotland.

Suggest you get yourself up to speed with Scottish Law and check that your replies are true before you post your mis-leading drivel and point folk in the wrong direction

We recently had a threat-o-gram and the boy wonders name has been replaced by the legal occupier. A hollow victory to a farcical scenario that should have never happened in the first place. No contact at all times!

If the above statement is true, this FOI statement is relly mis-leading or the poster is telling lies Request for Information – RFI20100780 Thank you for your email, received 4 June 2010, requesting information under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the Act”). You have requested the following information: "In your FOI RFI2007000441, you state that persons under the age of eighteen do not fulfil the criteria for prosecution. Is this also the case under Scottish law?” Yes, this is also the case under Scottish law. Your appeal rights This enquiry has been dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act, as indicated above. If you are not satisfied that we have complied with the Act in responding to your request, you have the right to an internal review by a BBC senior manager or legal adviser. Please contact us at the address above explaining what you would like us to review and including the reference number given at the start of this letter. If you are not satisfied with the internal review, you may appeal to the Information Commissioner, whose contact details are as follows: Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF; telephone: 01625 545700; Data Protection and Freedom of Information Advice - Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). Yours sincerely, Dan McGregor Senior Policy Adviser, TV Licensing Management Team

http://tvlicenceresistance.info/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1155.0;attach=201

It has everything to do with it. It tells the TVL staff that if they are requested to leave a property they must do so. Is that why the BBC removed most of them? Fortunately there are savvy folks out there on the web who downloaded them before they were removed. And folks, check out You-Tube, there are some real funnies on there of TVL staff getting what they deserve.

You are now thinking along the right path. Keep it up.:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

That should be UN-NECESSARY financial nuisance.

Well, well well, hand held detectors eh? The fairies at the bottom of my garden are real too, don't you know? Go to the start of this thread and see what a bunch of lying scumbags TVL goons really are!

The FOI, as you well know is the publics way to find out information that is not generally made public, especially by the BBC. I have the full visiting procedures document that the TVL goons have to adhere to and it clearly states that if they are told to leave the property they have to. i suspect you know all about this dont you, as you seem to know so much

why don't you want to me to post the FOI, scared people will recieve the correct info in black and white from the holier-than-thou BBC themselves? anyone wanting any FOI stuff PM me, theres literally hundreds available.....if you know where to look!

its all just bluff mate. have you any idea how complicated it is to get a search warrant? even the police struggle sometimes! the BBC even refuse FOI requests regarding the amounts of warrants issued. they only go after high profile refuseniks and only then cos these people have put themselves in the spotlight. NO CONTACT. slam the door on them the goons that come-a-visting have no more powers than me or you, unless of course your a police officer

we dont watch tv

people get prosecuted through their own naievity surrounding the myth of the powers of TVL. You DON'T have to give them your name, you DON'T have to answer the door to them, you DON'T have to tell them whether or not you have a tv, you DON'T have to sign ANYTHING and you certainly DON'T have to let them in your property. FOI to follow

tut tut, even when its in black and white that people under the age of eighteen aren't liable for prosecution, you still have to try to undermine the information. its straight from the horses mouth

If you don't watch LIVE tv broadcasts, you don't need a licence, don't waste your money! Take the kids and yourself off out for the day and spend the £145 having some fun.

The BBC Have sent a letter threatening prosecution. Let them try, been gaining HELPFUL advice from elsewhere. such as this FOI http://www.televisionlicence.info/downloads/foi/RFI2007000441.pdf

If you are so convinced that the info on the TVLA site is so wrong and mis-leading, why are you just stting and pontificating on this forum instead of leading a challenge against something that is clearly, in your opinion, legally if not morally wrong? And is available to all and anyone that has internet access?

Further to own thread, 'enforcers DO turn up', 17 years when i was pregnant with said 16 year old, I was prosecuted for STORING a colour telly for my friend which I was keeping as a surprise present for her sons birthday. An enforcement officer called at my address and I showed him the black and white (nowadays monochrome!) licence for my own black and white TV. The colour telly was in an un-opened box in my hallway and I had then in my innocence and stupidity allowed him in. I explained about said colour telly and he even inspected the box which was clearly Un-opened. It had not been delivered to my address. Recieved a summons a few weeks later and got a fine which my friend paid. Seems nothing changes The above was posted on loopinlouie's thread

And you are still totally missing my point. This about their stupidity in questioning a juvenile under caution without an appropriate adult, or are just picking out the bits that suits you. I have had a solictor TELL me that anything said by my sixteen year old is not admissable as it a totally ILLEGAL interview. I haven't admitted to anything so put that in your comms act and smoke it

11 Interviews – general (a) Action 11.1A An interview is the questioning of a person regarding their involvement or suspected involvement in a criminal offence or offences which, under paragraph 10.1, must be carried out under caution. Whenever a person is interviewed they must be informed of the nature of the offence, or further offence. © Juveniles and mentally disordered or otherwise mentally vulnerable people 11.15 A juvenile or person who is mentally disordered or otherwise mentally vulnerable must not be interviewed regarding their involvement or suspected involvement in a criminal offence or offences, or asked to provide or sign a written statement under caution or record of interview, in the absence of the appropriate adult This is an extract from the P.A.C.E. 2008 My sixteen year was only read the caution, AFTER answering the TVLA vultures quesions

I have a mind to just wait for the sixteen year old to be summonsed. Then go to court and watch the egg drip down the prosecutions face

I await their reply with interest

unless a solicitor managed to discredit the questioning completely. from post 23