Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
    • Just be careful with your language on what you post here - Keep it above board Lets see what you send to the big boss. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

diskmandave -vs- Central Ticketing ***WON WITH APOLOGY***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5217 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Further particulars to appear in business letters, order forms and websites

 

7.—(1) Every company shall disclose the particulars set out in paragraph (2) on—

(a) its business letters;

(b) its order forms; and

© its websites.

(2) The particulars are—

(a) the part of the United Kingdom in which the company is registered;

(b) the company’s registered number;

© the address of the company’s registered office;

(d) in the case of a limited company exempt from the obligation to use the word “limited” as part of its registered name under section 30 of the Companies Act 1985(3) or article 40 of the Companies (Northern) Ireland Order 1986(4), the fact that it is a limited company;

(e) in the case of a community interest company which is not a public company, the fact that it is a limited company; and

(f) in the case of an investment company within the meaning of section 833 of the Act, the fact that it is such a company.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Central Ticketing letterheads give the address as B16 6AX

 

 

According to their ICO licence this is not their R/O.

As a search confirms thus;

 

 

  1. Welcome - Home :: Central Ticketing
     
     
    Parking management is a specialist challenge. ... Registered Office: Radclyffe House, 66-68 Hagley Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B16 8PF. ...
    http://www.central-ticketing.com - Cached

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nahhh, I didn't buy the recorder Martin, the link provided

by BF doesn't offer the discount and in the absence of a

coupon code it's not a good deal compared to other retailers

on the internet.

 

I'm only going to buy one if I get the CAG discount, or CAG

gets a commission for the sale. Otherwise I can video any

outward calls on my computer.

 

Indeed, all other communication will have to be in writing

as I am actually heading somewhere with this now.. ;)

tight a*s dave also i notice ROXBOROUGH HOUSE our Pals MR Tunrbull hehe this is gonna be fun..i fink hehe

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's The Matter Dave

 

No Dca Baiting This Week

 

Haven't you read??

 

I've just joined the Cabot Fan Club!! :D

Just bought a Truecall machine too!! :D:D :lol:

 

CAGBOT is going to be a very busy boy! :p

 

Nonetheless, joking aside, please let's not take this off topic,

my Cabot threads are in the DCA Forum.. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I'm getting at Martin is, shouldn't their Registered Address

be on their Parking Charge Notices rather than the PO Box, as I'm

sure they will claim that they are indeed an official document?

 

 

Absolutely Dave-the regs appear to cover this point quite clearly...and the ticket is within itself a demand or notification for payment.

 

 

 

(e)

its bills of parcels, invoices and other demands for payment, receipts and letters of credit;

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A £1000 fine is in the offing for them if they get reported for this.

 

The words, "bull", and, "red rag" have just sprung to mind!! :D

 

Is it a Trading Standards complaint??

Edited by diskmandave
Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading Standards it is then!! :rolleyes:

 

 

Trading Standards,

Ladbrooke House,

Bordesley Street,

Digbeth,

Birmingham B5 5BL.

 

October 23rd 2009

Att: Copy of documents

 

Re: Central Ticketing,

PO Box 12655,

Birmingham,

B16 6AX.

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I have received a, "paking ticket" from Central Ticketing, they have a

Birmingham address which is why I have written you. The, "parking ticket"

won't be difficult to deal with, as I am

aware that it is nothing more than a threatening invoice.

 

However, whilst completing some basic research it has been brought to my

attention that this so called parking ticket is indeed a notice, a bill, an

invoice, AND a demand for payment and

as such should give their registered address;

 

Requirement to display registered name at registered office and inspection place

3.—(1) A company shall display its registered name at—

(a)

its registered office; and

(b)

any inspection place.

6.—(1) Every company shall disclose its registered name on—

(a)

its business letters, notices and other official publications;

(e)

its bills of parcels, invoices and other demands for payment, receipts and letters of credit;

 

Please find attached a copy of the back and front of the,"parking ticket", it

is an exact digital copy and only my private details have been obscured,

which can be supplied on request.

 

This is therefore, a formal complaint against Central Ticketing for the

reason stated above. Should you need my permission to process my

personal data, you may treat this letter as a release and authority to do

so puruant to the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Letter gone to Birmingham Trading Standards 10 minutes ago... :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep-Birmingham trading Standards

Office of Fair Trading and what about the MOJ ??????;)

 

While were at it CPUT too-they must be breaking some codes of practice somewhere along the line.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I submitted a complaint to Companies House last month against another parking [EDIT] for exactly the same reason, here is the response I received back:

 

Thank you for your email with the copy of the PCN. We have received several complaints regarding these notices issued by different companies. Our Legal Department has advised us that PCNs are in fact invoices issued on behalf of the company and as such only need carry the name of the company. The PCN you have supplied correctly states the name of the company so there is no breach of company legislation.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Dominic Roberts

Case Manager

Technical Offences Team

Apparently the Companies House lawyers consider these "invoices" too ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I misread your post Dave, was the complaint about not displaying the registered office address or the company name?

 

The section your refer to above only requires the company name displayed on invoices which these people appear to do.

 

Please don't get me wrong, I am not defending these scumbags, I hate PPC's just as much as you do - read my thread at: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-offences/221818-tps-parking-solutions-limited.html

Edited by spitfire650
Link to post
Share on other sites

HMMM ?

 

(e)

its bills of parcels, invoices and other demands for payment, receipts and letters of credit;

 

Exactly. Remind Companies House of this. As their lawyers have declared them to be invoices why are they not acting when the legislation is clear and their own lawyers are clearly of the opinion that these are invoices. Add in any letters you get asking for payment as these are clearly "and other demands for payment".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Requirement to display registered name at registered office and inspection place

3.—(1) A company shall display its registered name at—

(a)

its registered office; and

(b)

any inspection place.

6.—(1) Every company shall disclose its registered name on—

(a)

its business letters, notices and other official publications;

(e)

its bills of parcels, invoices and other demands for payment, receipts and letters of credit;

 

I thought that was pretty straight forward, but lets just wait and

see what Birmingham Trading Standards come back with and leave

it at that for now. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Companies House will be interested ;)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-offences/226388-diskmandave-central-ticketing-4.html#post2523166

(post #65)

 

Let's wait and see what Birmingham Trading Standards come back with.. :)

Edited by diskmandave
grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...