Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA CCA - Is it legal?


nks22
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Im on the lookout for the unlawful recession letter template, ill let you know if I come accross it.
This from diddydicky:

you dont have to explain why

 

even a simple

 

"You have unlawfully repudiated the agreement and i accept your unlawful repudiation"

 

will do

 

you are a layman and that is sufficient

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/196312-invalid-default-notices-49.html#post2714954

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i'm following this thread with much interest, thanks nks22 for starting it. Although i did notice your early frustration when making your first posts, it seems to be ganing some welcome momentum now.

 

AMAZING my MBNA letter is exactly as yours, and the follow-up letter too.

 

the only differnce in my case is that MBNA did not provide any agreement terms or contract. however, i am a bit concerned that it may be because i put the reference s77(1) instead of s78. however, when i sent my dn, i did put the correct ref. any views on this?

 

out of interest, my letters came delivered Royal mail with a ukmail frank but with no date. i understand from another cagger that this is second class business mail, not 1st, making the dn out of time. i was also advised to keep my envelope and write on it the date received in case it is needed in court.

 

anyone got any views, thanks. BAB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ukmail is second class. There will be a small s in the top right hand corner of the envelope. In fact any mail other than Royal Mail is deemed second class. Mark your letter received xxx, which is 4 days after posting, so for the 11th it probably arrived on the 15th. Keep the envelope safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was also advised to keep my envelope and write on it the date received in case it is needed in court.

 

Good advice, although if they're like mine - the termination letter dated eight days after the DN - it won't be an issue.

 

the only differnce in my case is that MBNA did not provide any agreement terms or contract. however, i am a bit concerned that it may be because i put the reference s77(1) instead of s78. however, when i sent my dn, i did put the correct ref. any views on this?
I don't think that would justify them not responding. I'd just send the follow-up 'in dispute' letter.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice, although if they're like mine - the termination letter dated eight days after the DN - it won't be an issue.

 

I don't think that would justify them not responding. I'd just send the follow-up 'in dispute' letter.

 

 

Should not worry doubt if MBNA can tell the difference between numbers i.e. 77/78 as if they read them come on doubt it.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Vint.

 

so, we all got dodgy or no agreements. we all got dodgy dn's. plus, we all got illegal terminations.

 

whats next, do we start action ourselves or wait for the debt purchasor when he realises were not paying?

 

any ideas?

No, starting action yourself is frought with danger. As the claimant, you need to prove your case. Best option by far is to defend an action, when the claimant has to prove their case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My current understanding - and I'm happy to be corrected - is that the letter (above #20) confirming sale isn't yet termination and that there will be a formal Notice of Assignment to come. Hopefully that will share the same incorrect date. If so, at that point it's necessary to accept the 'unlawful recission'.

 

???

Link to post
Share on other sites

My current understanding - and I'm happy to be corrected - is that the letter (above #20) confirming sale isn't yet termination and that there will be a formal Notice of Assignment to come. Hopefully that will share the same incorrect date. If so, at that point it's necessary to accept the 'unlawful recission'.

 

???

 

Im unsure on this too - im thinking that selling the account to a DCA before the date on the DN is unlawful termination?

 

What do u think vint?

I have no legal qualifications whatsoever, so please check any input I have for accuracy. And please correct me if you disagree!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legal technicalities aside, it seems to me that if someone tells you to "pay us £x by this date or else you'll have to give us £xx" but then before that date says they've sold the debt to someone else, as a layman it's reasonable to believe that you're prevented from complying with their original deadline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im unsure on this too - im thinking that selling the account to a DCA before the date on the DN is unlawful termination?

 

What do u think vint?

Yes, if the assignment is absolute and not equtable, then it would be unlawful termnation.

 

You need to ask them what kind of assignment this was and where is my assignment notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legal technicalities aside, it seems to me that if someone tells you to "pay us £x by this date or else you'll have to give us £xx" but then before that date says they've sold the debt to someone else, as a layman it's reasonable to believe that you're prevented from complying with their original deadline.

Correct, depending on the type of assignment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, depending on the type of assignment

 

As a layman, though, can I be expected to know about such things? The acid test must be, can I still remedy the breach by complying with the DN and so retain my rights under the original agreement, i.e. to revolving credit, or has the sale of my debt removed that option prematurely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the wording of the letter in #26 of this thread says

 

"your outstanding balance due under the above account has been sold to direct legal DTL"

 

if an account is 'sold', it would then become the property of the purchasor ie the new owner. surely then, this make the transfer absolute rather than equitable. or am i missing something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if an account is 'sold', it would then become the property of the purchasor ie the new owner. surely then, this make the transfer absolute rather than equitable. or am i missing something?

 

You'd think so. It's always best to have written proof, though, and I await my first contact from Direct Legal with interest.

 

can anyone tell me if i can bring a bank overdraft to an unenforcable position in the same way as a card?

 

I'd imagine you start with a request for a copy of the original agreement but you'll probably get better advice if you ask in the folder for the relevant bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not yet. As I said, I'm awaiting the next contact. It will be necessary but do I send it to MBNA or Direct Legal?

You will need to send it to MBNA, at the point of termination. The assignment of the account, letter of termination or requesting the ballance in full are all terminations. They show their intention not to continue with the contract.

 

If your DN is faulty and any of the above terminations has happened, send the Letter to MBNA, head office address not the miriad of PO box numbers that they use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to send it to MBNA, at the point of termination. The assignment of the account, letter of termination or requesting the ballance in full are all terminations. They show their intention not to continue with the contract.

 

If your DN is faulty and any of the above terminations has happened, send the Letter to MBNA, head office address not the miriad of PO box numbers that they use.

 

 

thanks Vint. would you say the letter detailed on #26 is an assignment/termination or just an advisory letter following which we should await an assignment/termination letter. ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not yet. As I said, I'm awaiting the next contact. It will be necessary but do I send it to MBNA or Direct Legal?

This is what your letter will look like, when you send it on the 29th January.

 

MBNA Europe Bank Limited

P.O. Box 30

Chester Business Park

Wrexham Road

Chester

CH4 9FD

 

29th January 2010.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unlawful Rescission.

 

With reference to the alleged debt to your company, I refer to your Default Notice dated 11th January 2010, posted second class and received by me on 15th January 2010, and your subsequent actions confirming your previous written intentions to terminate the agreement and additionally disposing of the account to a third party, prior to the rectification date.

 

Notwithstanding that the default notice failed to give me the required statutory time in which to seek legal advice and/or remedy any alleged defect, as laid out in s87 of the CCA 1974, your actions have resulted in insufficient time for me to even obtain an appointment with a solicitor let alone remedy the alleged default. Your recent actions have lead to you unlawfully rescinding the agreement.

 

I accept your unlawful rescission of the agreement I note that you are now entitled to claim those arrears genuinely due at the time of the termination (not including any unlawful charges ) and i would be obliged if you would advise me of the exact amount of those arrears, against which will be a claim for unlawful rescission

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Edited by vint1954
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...