Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can Anyone advise what my next move is please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5354 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A few months ago I was ordered to attend court over a debt to finance wales a few years ago which was a loan for a business start up that never happened.

 

I had to give a statement of my income that was sent off to the solicitor acting for finance wales. In court I explained my current situation which basically is that for the last 3 years I have been caring for my wife and our 4 children the eldest which has disabilities, I have very little expenditure each month as you can imagine.

 

When I finished the court represetative stated I may or may not be contacted by finance wales/the solicitor to advise their action in which she stated given the information I had given it was unlikely they would persue the matter.

 

I have today received a letter from another firm of solicitors regarding the same matter which is as follows.

 

 

Dear Mr *****

 

As you are aware (No I am not aware), we act for Finance Wales Investments Ltd regarding recovery of monies loaned to you that have yet to be repaid.

 

We understand that you attended Cardiff County Counrt for questioning and have received a copy of your record of Examination (Not received anything since I attended court).

 

Please provide us with details of any proposals that you have for repayment of the debt. We can confirm that the amount owning under the judgement of 30 July 2008 is £3,037.71 with interest accruing at a daily rate. Futher, please confirm whether you have sought any advice from the Citizens Advice Bureau regarding your liabilities and whether any debt management plan is currently in place.

 

Please note that if we do not hear from you within 14 days we will be advising our cliet to take further enforcement action against you without notice.

 

yours sincerely

 

 

 

I did get advice from CAB over the phone who suggested that I contact all my creditors for a full balance and reference numbers etc to enable me to go for a Debt Relief Order. As of yet I have heard nothing back from the other creditors most of which are over 6 years old so don't suppose is active anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its already been to a court, then its the court you should be dealing with & no-one else.

Sounds like this other lot are just chancing their arm with you.

 

I am surprised that it has passed to a different firm of solicitors. When I went to court I did not go before a judge or anything ( I did not know what was going to happen as I just had a summons to attend court) I was just in a side room with a court representative who had a statement of income form that she went through and I provided proof of income etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court representative would have agreed on an amount to be repaid monthly with you & then that would have been the end of it.

There is absolutely no reason as to why you should be getting threatening follow up letters like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court representative would have agreed on an amount to be repaid monthly with you & then that would have been the end of it.

There is absolutely no reason as to why you should be getting threatening follow up letters like this.

 

So I should write to this solicitor stating that I know nothing of them taking on the matter and that I should only recieve correspondace from the court

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a draft letter I was going to send to Hugh James, It is not finished as yet but thought I would reply to comply with the 14 days they have requested.

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I am writing in responce to your letter dated 1st October 2009.

When I attended court in early July 2009 Morgans Solicitors were acting on behalf of Finance Wales Investments Ltd at that time so I am interested as to why Hugh James have now taken over this file and wondered if you can answer why this has happened.

In your letter you also state that I have received a copy of my record of examination to which I have not recevied or heard nothing since attending court in July 2009.

On receiving your letter I will be contacted Cardiff Couty Court as if there is information that I should have received then I would like a copy

If you have a copy of my financial situation then you will be aware that I was not in a position to make payment on the debt and that has not changed since I last attended court, I would like to add that the threats in your letter of daily interest being added and reply in 14 days or futher action have not helped my already sick wife.

I have sought advice from the Citizrns Advice Bureau who on looking at my situation advised that I first write to my creditors which I have done so and then apply for a Debt Relief Order, I am awaiting a responce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am writing in responce to your letter dated 1st October 2009.

When I attended court in early July 2009 Morgans Solicitors were acting on behalf of Finance Wales Investments Ltd at that time so I am interested as to why Hugh James have now taken over this file and wondered if you can answer why this has happened.

In your letter you also state that I have received a copy of my record of examination to which I have not recevied or heard nothing since attending court in July 2009.

On receiving your letter I will be contacted Cardiff Couty Court as if there is information that I should have received then I would like a copy

If you have a copy of my financial situation then you will be aware that I was not in a position to make payment on the debt and that has not changed since I last attended court, I would like to add that the threats in your letter of daily interest being added and reply in 14 days or futher action have not helped my already sick wife.

I have sought advice from the Citizrns Advice Bureau who on looking at my situation advised that I first write to my creditors which I have done so and then apply for a Debt Relief Order, I am awaiting a responce.

 

I wouldn't waste your time at all. And most certainly would not inform them of any personal circumstances, regarding your wife.

 

They couldn't care less!

Their next letter will be 'Is your wife insured should she die, and will this cover the amount of debt you owe us!'

 

As Mr.Ton has already said, the only people you really need to be talking to is the courts, unless you receive anything from them in relation to this matter then I would quite honestly ignore them, and only send them correspondence in relation to their persistant harassment which will be met with robust legal action should they continue..:p

 

 

Boo:wink:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...