Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Euro Car Park Ticket


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone!

 

Registered here because I've just been given a ticket!

 

Basically I parked at St Georges Retail park in Leicester, on the emptiest bit of the car park, and walked into town, because I had a job interview. The main reason I parked here was because I just cannot afford to pay £3/4 a time to park in a paid car park, due to my financial circumstances!

 

Is there any way I can get around not paying this charge? I know full well it was my fault, and it does state that anyone leaving the site that leaves there car there could be fined.

 

But in my defence, I did use the KFC on the site afterwards (Y)

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

jaspen,

 

If this is a private car park, you can challenge the ticket using the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999 Schedule 2 (1)(e). This approach will not work if the car park is owned by Leicester Council.

 

The parking charges constitute an unfair penalty under reference to paragraph 1(e) of Schedule 2 of the said regulations:

Indicative and non-exhaustive list of terms which may be regarded as unfair - 1. Terms which have the object or effect of - (e) requiring any consumer who fails his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation’.

 

The argument will follow the same line as bank charges because you agree that you are in breach of contract but the charges for your breach is disproportionate to the offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply mate. It is a private car park yes.

 

The thing is, the only proof they have is whoever issued the ticket, as there is no CCTV monitoring the car park. (I have a look around before I left to make sure). So could I just claim that I wasn't driving? I've had a read around the forum, and have come to the conclusion that I can either do this, or ignore them totally?

 

Obviously lying is wrong, but if it saves me £70..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Read through the posts in this forum, you'll find plenty of people in similar situations to you.

 

Expect plenty more letters, some will come from debt collectors and solicitors stating they "MAY" take you to court... they are hoping to scare you into paying, but fortunately for you, you've done your research and realise that what they are doing is a legal [problem].

Link to post
Share on other sites

jaspen,

 

You do not need to be scared. Their action is unlawful already by charging disproportionate fees.

 

Like everyone is saying here and in other parking thread, just ignore them.

 

If they eventually decide to take you to court, do not forget to comeback for help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not got a lot of expertise in this area, so simply ignoring it won't harm my credit rating or anything like that will it? I know I've not taken any credit out, but normally when debt collectors come its due to credit not being paid.

 

Don't confuse debt collectors with bailiffs.

 

The former are just ordinary private companies with no powers whatsoever. They can only write letters and make phonecalls - they can't even take legal action because any debts aren't theirs.

 

For your credit to be affected, you'd have to be taken to court, lose and still refuse to pay after 28 days. If that happened (it won't), then credit issues and bailiff problems would arise.

 

It's all theoretical though. Euro run a well known mail [problem] and have never taken anyone to court (they're a big company and the last thing they want is their shady goings on in the media).

 

Euro [problem] just involves ignoring letters from them, Brinx and Control Account. Then they go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Alrite chaps?

 

Got the letter through today:

EURO CAR PARKS: PARKING CHARGE NOTICE ENFORCEMENT

 

It lists the car park as:

JUNCTION - LEICESTER

 

and contravention as:

OTHER

 

Not sure if this means anything special to be fair.

 

Also wondering if they can obtain my phone number in any way? I'm on the electoral register and stuff, I'm gonna ignore the letters, I just don't want them hassling my mum on the phone, cos then she'll hassle me!;)

Edited by jaspen
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah I'm not in the directory mate, I will just laugh at them when they ring. Why couldnt they write what the contravention actually was, rather than other, lazy buggers

 

They can't write what the contravention was coz there wasn't one! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

EURO CAR PARKS: PARKING CHARGE NOTICE ENFORCEMENT

 

It lists the car park as:

JUNCTION - LEICESTER

 

and contravention as:

OTHER

 

Not sure if this means anything special to be fair.

 

So it's an invoice which doesn't even explain what it's for?

 

This just demonstrates how they just chuck out tens of letters each day and then collect the cheques in the morning.

 

These vultures are revolting companies, but Euro and NCP are especially despicable.

 

Carry on ignoring and you should receive a letter from Brinx. And guess who owns Brinx? Euro Car Park no less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE:

 

Got a letter through today from Control Account PLC

 

Dear Mr *******

 

Client: EURO CAR PARKS LTD

Account No: 01530000197

Ref No: 907444

Amount Due: £98.75

 

We have been instructed by our above named Client and regret to note that you have failed to contact them with your proposals for settlement of this overdue account (not sure when i opened an account with them..)

 

This account has been passed to ourselves with firm instructions to commence Litigation and to obtain Judgment against you. Such a course of action may have an adverse affect on your ability to obtain credit and would include costs, court fees and interest which may disproportionately increase the amount outstanding.

 

To avoid this, please telephone the undersigned within five working days of the date of this letter or send your payment, by return, to the above address.

Cheques or Postal Orders should be made payable to Controlaccount plc.

 

Yours sincerely

 

MERLYN SMITH

Collections Dept

 

 

So... Do I carry on ignoring?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say continue ignoring.

 

I got a similar type PCN and stupidly paid it! £50 down the pan. 4 months later I got another one and followed the advice on here and ignored it. I parked there again (I shop there regularly) and as I was walking into the shops I saw the car park attendant making note of all the car regs. His eyes lit up when he saw mine, something must have flashed up on his little PDA - unpaid ticket? Anyway, that was at least 2 months ago and still nothing has come through the letter box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...