Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with N244 form - set aside CCJ


caller
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think I better start a new thread in this title

 

I need help to fill the N244 form - set aside CCJ

 

Some help please to fill the form

 

On the N244 form, Paragraph 3

 

Qs3 . What order are you asking the court to make and why?

 

I intend to write this

Take Notice that the Defendant asked the court to set aside and stayed the County Court Judegement and the Charging Order as new evidence/developement could let the defendant to defense successfully asto the claimant's particular of claim

 

Qs 4 Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for? Yes/No

 

Don't know what to say?

 

Qs 6 How long do you think the hearing will last?

 

Should I say 15..... or 30 minutes or 1 hour?

 

Qs 9 who should be served with this application?

 

And as on the claim form for the CCJ, there's a claimant (A )and the solicitor (B) on anothe box of ' the address for sending documents and payments.

 

Who should I put on the form? the claimant A or both A & B

 

------------------------------------------------------------

I am preparing some essay I think I would put it as the statement of case to attached with form and I try to make it clear and short.

 

I would like to say the alleged claim is not enforcement due to

 

1) no NoA

2) no DN

3) get big misleading advice from CAB and thus not doing the right thing at the right time to appeal with the CCJ

 

I know these point not sounding very promissing but I would give it a go.

 

Anyone? could you share your experience .....

 

Any opinion would be much appreciated.

 

 

[/url]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya :) will try to sort you out

 

I think I better start a new thread in this title

 

I need help to fill the N244 form - set aside CCJ

 

Some help please to fill the form

 

On the N244 form, Paragraph 3

 

Qs3 . What order are you asking the court to make and why?

 

I intend to write this

Take Notice that the Defendant asked the court to set aside and stayed the County Court Judgment and the Charging Order as new evidence/development could let the defendant to defense successfully Astor the claimant's particular of claim

 

Your asking the court to do something for you and there is no need to try to copy legal jargon so just say what your asking for in simple English :) something like...

 

To set aside County Court Judgment and Charging Order due to the defendants lack of experience at the time of the claim and new evidence regarding the claimants particulars of claim which could result in a successful defense.

 

Or something like that :cool:

 

Qs 4 Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for? Yes/No

 

Don't know what to say?

 

either no or what you want the judge to order how about...

 

The Judgment and Charging order is set aside pending submission of a revised defense document within the next 14 days.

 

 

Qs 6 How long do you think the hearing will last?

 

Should I say 15..... or 30 minutes or 1 hour?

 

say 15 minutes

 

Qs 9 who should be served with this application?

 

And as on the claim form for the CCJ, there's a claimant (A )and the solicitor (B) on anothe box of ' the address for sending documents and payments.

 

Who should I put on the form? the claimant A or both A & B

 

Both A and B let them both know :)

 

------------------------------------------------------------

I am preparing some essay I think I would put it as the statement of case to attached with form and I try to make it clear and short.

 

I would like to say the alleged claim is not enforcement due to

 

1) no NoA

2) no DN

3) get big misleading advice from CAB and thus not doing the right thing at the right time to appeal with the CCJ

 

You cant use faulty advice as a reason to lift a CCJ :rolleyes: its your responsibility to get sound advice, all the forms say this :cool:

 

I know these point not sounding very promissing but I would give it a go.

 

Anyone? could you share your experience .....

 

Any opinion would be much appreciated.

 

 

 

 

 

Have you read the National Debt Lines advice sheet on setting aside CCJ's? have a look here :)

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 12 How To Set Aside A Judgment In The County Court

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Castlebest(pete), thanks for all these useful advice

 

I have trouble to fill in the

 

Qs 10 what information will you be relying on, in support of your application?

 

1) the attached witness statement

2) the statement of case

3) the evidence set out in the box below

 

I was advised at other nice people in this forum I shoud use 2)

 

Could anyone tell me what is the difference of these all?

 

I had read some other threads, it seemed other people wrote a lot statement on the form N244.

 

I just have a few line about my case -

  1. the DCA ignored my requests of NoA thus showing that they maybe not have one thus they are not entitle to chase the debt and collect it;
  2. I had recently sent out SAR to the OC and still waiting to clear up everything;
  3. I had never received DN thus the DCA was wrong to chase the debt even thought on their POA they claimed they had served it.
  4. It take me sometime to do research and know better about my right as I was mislead by the CAB

i don't think I could use 3)

 

The more I read the more I am confused.... what is a draft statement, LBA...when do you use it. ~Should I use those in my case. Do I draft something to the court after I know the hearing date and sent it off, if I want to change something then I shoud sent out amendment of statement?

 

I am very confused with all this staffs and procedure.

 

Try to submit the N244 asap before I received order of sale from the DCA

 

After i submit the form, I intend to write to the DCA requesting again the NoA, is it the right thing to do.

 

I am still waiting for the SAR, counting the 40 days time limit. If they don't, I learnt from the forum that I shoud send another letter.

 

any advice would be much appreciated

 

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi caller,

what were the circumstances of the original judgment?

was it a default judgment or did u put in defence or admission?

have u made any documentation requests to uphold ur claim for setting aside, if so, which ones and what have u had in return?

to set aside you need to show the ability to put a non-fanciful defence to the original claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, r&b, thanks for your reply.

 

what were the circumstances of the original judgment?

was it a default judgment or did u put in defence or admission

 

 

tick -full amount on the claim form...

 

The lady at the CAB filled up all the claim form and asked me to sign, she just thought I should go bankrupty (I went in there straight away I got the claim form & at that time I told her I had others debt too).

 

She ignored my plea that the amount was not right and I am not sure the account reference was right. she filled : admit all the amount and the debt. She thought I had debt with the OC and a DCA sending claim form then everything should be just go one direction. She asked me to sign and put it in a envelope, sealed it and tell me to post out straight afterwards.

 

I am so naive and always trust people ( at that moment I just feel thankful for all her help, she seemed very authority in a way).

 

After I got the judgement (no hearing not as the lady at CAB told me, I was hoping that I could plea to judge about monthly repayment), I went back, another lady told me to save money just send a letter in asking to transfer the case to local court, she didn't mention I could set aside or do anything at that specif time period (now I learnt from this forum, there actually something I do do at that specific period, I find this forum too late).

 

Anyway It's all my fault, things just swirlled and swirlled, while I waiting for any outcome after I sent the letter to court, I actually received is a hearing for CO instead, I hardly breath during all this chaos to handle the CO case (during all those time, now I reflect, maybe I could do something like asking the judge about set aside or vary the judgement).

 

I was so confusing for all those hearing and legal staffs.

 

Anyway after the CO, now then the DCA start to chase the money in full and they ignored any of my offer no matter what.

 

Now they just want to get the order of sale since I could not fulful the full amount (the judgement is granted for full amount of the debt).

 

Such push me to the edge and I find out N244 from the thread, I have to have a go OR I would lost my home.

 

The most problem is I had admitted the full amount at the claim form.

 

I don't know if I agrue the NoA, DN... Would it be wise to say now i challenge the claimed amount? Would it better leave it alone?

 

I could only show the court my letter requesting NoA to the DCA and the letter requesting SAR to the OC (still waiting).

 

sorry for such long thread...Any advice would be much appreciated.

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi caller,

well i had a similar issue with the CCCS so ur not alone. the adission may have some bearing on this im afraid. i put in for set aside on 2 such cases and lost, as there were (according to the 2 barristers for the other side) no grounds in the Civil Procedure Rules to set aside a judgment under full admission, obviously backed up by the DJ. that said there are aothers who have successfully used this route who havent run into such legal knowhow.

i am waiting for confirmation, as then only knowedge i have of this is what i was told by these barristers during the hearing, but i understand the correct route in law, to be the seeking of removal of the admission (down to the court to accept) due to new evidence and/or a fresh action appealing the original judgment.

i have tried to get the answers on this thread so maybe keep an eye out here if any answers are forthcoming:

http://consumeractiongroup.com/forum/legal-issues/213560-procedure-challenging-non-default.html

 

if i were you i would get as much documentation to back your case as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, r&b, many thanks fot let me know about this (reading the thread now,still very confusing, all of this is fresh and open my eyes as I am still very low at this moment).

 

I am not sure would it be worser I rush down this road without properly know what I am doing.

 

Anyway, I have some development with my DCA, as I said before, they threathen me that they would apply 'order of sale' at the end of this week if I did not pay in full (they would not accept any of my offer, they want full amount now). I just received a letter asking me to contact them to discuss about the repayment.

 

I think I would stick with my monthly offer to them and wait for the SAR from the OC (I am worried sick now since I am so studpid I had provided my signature to the OC, I worry they would lift my signature etc, I would be more deep hot boiling water.)

 

I still want to set aside but this may buy me a bit time (the order of sale hanging on my head) and at the same time I could learn more at the forum to get a better picture what to do next.

 

I mean if I apply and then fail, what would happen? More court fee and the debt bigger and bigger then over the small claim limit and I would face more hursh law rules tec.

 

I am thinkging I shall open a new thread to draw anyone's sharing of their experience and advices.

 

meanwhile any advice about 'set aside' would be much appreciated.

 

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you managed to complete the N244 now or do you need more help - I've been laid low for a few days with Swine Flu but am a lot better now, around until Wednesday if you need more help.

 

I don't think starting a new thread will help, it will only confuse things. You need to concentrate on the set aside - personally I would ignore the fact that you weren't helped with the original claim and stick to the fact that you have an outstanding SAR with the clients and at no time have they verified the ACTUAL amount of any arrears on the account nor the ORIGNAL sum owed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi SG,

i have a real worry about gong for set aside when the judgment is not a 'default'. under what section of the CPR could caller justifiably ask for the judgment to be set aside? as above this was a problem i ran into.

to stave off the issue of forced sale, a temp measure could be to try for a redetermination hearing to allow a reasonable, affordable payment perhaps?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A Redetermination hearing would be a much better route - thanks for mentioning that r&B, it certainly would force the original creditor and DCA involved to provide the docucments they haven't already provided, ie default notice and notice of assignment. It would also keep the costs down as the request could include something line "costs to be kept to a minimum on both sides"

 

Nice one.... I've tipped your scales accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, many thanks to you, sillygilr11 & r&b,

 

I've been laid low for a few days with Swine Flu but am a lot better now, around until Wednesday if you need more help

 

Hi, sillygilr 11, I am so sorry to hear about that, hope you feeling better and better. So grateful to you as you are suffering and still thinking of me at this hard time.

 

I think I am going to negotable with the DCA right now as I received the DCA letter about the repayment.

 

Therefore I think I could hold them off for a while (as the order of sale still hanging over my head), therefore I think I better make sure to learn more before I submit the N244.

 

AGain,thanks to you both for the good advice, I am still confusing about...

 

What is 'A Redetermination hearing' is it something like asking the judge to vary the repayment by using the N245? I always thought by using N245, you just ask the judge to vary the amount since the debtor could not afford it and show the court evidence to justify the better agreement with the creditor.

 

At such hearing, could you do arguement like : the amount is not the rightful amount and claimed the DCA is not the rightful owner? And throw out the DCA claim at all, no more CCJ?

 

Sorry I just confused and my main goal is to get rid of this CCJ and then prepare for another round with the DCA with a new CCJ hearing.

 

Thanks of all both of your help. Hi, sillygirl11, Please let me know if you are better, best wish to you....

 

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, forget to ask...

 

Could I ask for 'A Redetermination hearing' under my situation, would there be something like ..'you had admitted the full amount, now it's not right to do such and such...

 

And if I applied this, would the outcome affect N244 if I would like to submit it later...

 

Sorry loads of question from me, Thanks to you all from the bottom of my heart.

 

I still reading those thread related to r&b's case, eye opener and still try to absorb it all..

 

Thanks to you all.

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

a redetermination hearing will put forward your income and expenditure, upon which the judge will decide a reasonable mthly payment. you basically show a mthly amount u can afford and as long as your i&e backs it up, the judge will make a decision based on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, r&b,

 

thanks for your reply. That's great help. How's you case develope? I wish you the best. I still reading all the threads you mentioned, it's so complicate for me to understand.

 

My question : AT the redetermination hearing, could I ask the judge to look at other things eg. the amount I do want to dispute, could you do that or I should do the N244 at the same time. Could the court allow you to do both, or one after the other.

 

really don't understand the 'procedure'.

 

Could anyone tell me what is these term - 'sketeton draft' 'defensive draft' when do one needs to do that?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

ps Sillygirl, I hope you feel better. best regards.

Caller

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, I haven't back to the internet casue some problem at home.

 

I just get back the SAR file from the credit company.

 

They are all printed out paper, the credit agreement just a printed out paper without any signature etc.(sorry could not upload them as no facilities at the public library to do so)

 

Now I just received the DCA would accept my proposed monthly repayment, should I

 

(a)starting paying them and at the same time submit the N244 form

(b)not paying them and at the saome time submit the N244 form

©starting paying them without doing set aside as the chance to be granted is very small?

 

Any advice would be much much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...