Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hsbc Still No Cca Help


yousef1973
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have nt paid my HHSBC credit card now for about 5 months.

They used to call me once a fortnight, even offered to settle at 50% at one time. I have obviously received my default Notices and threats through post.

For some reason they have not rang me for over a month.

On 2nd September I requested a CCA from HSBC.

 

I got a letter through from them on Saturday.

 

as follows:

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated 1st September 2009 in which you submit a formal request for documentatio in accordance with section 78 of the consumer credit act 1974 made on the following legal basis:

The pre-action disclosure rule set out in r31.16 civil procedure rules 1999

 

I acnowlege your request and advice you that the HSBC Group aims to respond to such request in 15 working days from receipt by us of your letter.

 

 

WHAT DO YOU THINK IS THIS NORMAL, THEY HAVE SENT THIS LETTER OUT 10 DAYS LATER AND STILL NO CCA.

 

PLEASE ADVICE, IF I NEED TO PREPARE FOR SOMETHING.

 

THANKS

Link to post
Share on other sites

GOT AN ENVELOPE FROM HSBC TODAY, WITH THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS.

 

1..CREDIT CARD AGREEMENT....TOTALLY BLANK, SOMETHING THEY HAVE JUST PICKED UP FROM A FILING CABINET.

NO SIGNITURE, NO NAME, NO ADDRESS NOTHING..TOTALLY BLANK.

 

2.. STATEMENTS STATING WHAT I OWE.

 

3...TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

 

ALSO ATTACHED LETTER AS FOLLOWS:

 

Dear Mr xxxxx

 

Further to your letter dated 1/9/09, please find enclosed a copy documents as requested.

 

Section 78(1) of the consumer Credit Act 1974 requires us to provide ''...a copy of the executed agreement(if any)...''. Regulation 3 (2) of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 allows that certain items may be omitted from such copies, includingn the signiture box and signiture.

 

Therefore, the copy of the executed agreement we must supply is a copy but need not be a photocopy of the signed agreement. Regulations also requires us to provide a a copy of the executed agreement, as varied, where there is power to vary the terms of the agreement, which there is with your card agreement and that power has been excercised to vary the agreement, which again is the case with your card agreement.

 

We therefor enclose an upto date copy of the terms and conditions applicable to your account, (and)a copy of the latest variation notice issued in respect of your account and a blank copy of the agreement form. ***the agreement form contains the original terms and conditions that you accepted when you entered into the agreement. Clause...Gives the blank the right to vary the terms and conditions.*** The variation notice shows that the terms have been varied and therfore in accordance with this legislation the up to date terms and conditions are the appropriate information to produce.

 

In addition to this, please find enclosed a signed statement of account validating any debt outstanding.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

NOW AFTER READING ALL THAT, I AM REALLY CONFUSED, ARE THEY SAYING THEY ARE IN RIGHT AND BLANK CONTRACT HAS THE SAME POWER.

 

THEY DONT HAVE THE ORIGINAK CONTRACT AS I DONT REMEMBER SIGNING ONE, AS I TOOK THIS CARD NEARLY 20 YEARS AGO LATE EIGHTIES.

 

PLEASE SOMEONE ADVICE WHAT I SHOULD DO NEXT,

AS THESE DOCUMENTS ARRIVED AFTER 16 DAYS.

 

YESTERDAY 16/9/09 I SENT THEM A LETTER STATING MY ACCOUNT IS IN DEFAULT AS THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN RECEIVED.

 

PLEASE?????????/

Edited by yousef1973
Link to post
Share on other sites

Account In Dispute

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter of (Date), the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On (Date) I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

 

 

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on (Date) (12+2 working days AFTER the CCA request was sent)

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document. In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

This limit has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter, which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a result,probably why they couldn't be bothered to chase anything although now the cat is out of the bag i'd expect them to step it up in an effort to get something back. Can't see what they can do though,certainly not enforceable .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, even though yesterday i sent them a standard letter stating they have not responded in time and the account is now in default.

 

I like the above letter plus in more details, so tomorrow that one is going out too recorded

 

ta

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same boat with HSBC and a blank agreement, although a lot further down the line with them.

 

No matter what you say they will insist that they have complied with the CCA ( even though they know they have not) they will then bounce you round their in house collection services, at some point when you are fed up of playing their games send them a final response............. they will then pass you onto various outside DCA's just keep all the letters and file them..........if you are bored send the "quite frankly I am bemused" letter and point out that you have already submitted your final response to HSBC.

 

Mine has been going on since August 2008 and I still get the odd letter politely asking for money

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't paid HSBC anything since January 09.After I requested my agreement in January they first of all tried to fob me off with a 'blank agreement' after I had confirmed my identity of course :rolleyes: Then when I told them it was not acceptable they then sent me a 'reconstituted agreement' after admitting in writing that they do not keep any documents prior to 2003.

My account was passed to Capquest who I think have got fed up as I am now being pestered by Metropolitan (HSBC) Collection serv.

 

If you have received a blank agreement then there is a good chance they dont have the original :)

 

For the record, my account goes back to 1998

Link to post
Share on other sites

and then they will throw in the heavies.............. DG solicitors.............. OH wow they actually share the same post code with metropolitan............... I am not sure that the matter is closed yet but is there a letter i can send asking them to "put up or shut up"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

DG are just HSBC in house monkeys. I would just ignore them and see what their next move is.HSBC seem very selective with responces to letters in my experience anyway.

 

There is some good info in my thread if you want a read

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/188794-hsbc-cca-non-compliance.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 5 months later...

Hsbc Has Now Passed This Account To Allied International Uk Ltd.

I Have Received A Yellow Card Today, Stating Warning Call Mr Watson On 01412283008, Also They Are Harassing Me Over Phone.

 

They Are Threaing To Issue Court Summons.

 

Can Someone Please Advice If I Should Write To These Guys And If So Any Ideas Would Be Appreciated

 

Please Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to highjack or anything but it there a link on the forums some where to what you have all described as a "final response" letter? Thanks.

 

HSBC HAS NOW PASSED THIS ACCOUNT TO ALLIED INTERNATIONAL UK LTD.

I HAVE RECEIVED A YELLOW CARD TODAY, STATING WARNING CALL MR WATSON ON 01412283008, ALSO THEY ARE HARASSING ME OVER PHONE.

 

THEY ARE THREAING TO ISSUE COURT SUMMONS.

 

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE ADVICE IF I SHOULD WRITE TO THESE GUYS AND IF SO ANY IDEAS WOULD BE APPRECIATED

 

PLEASE HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

All Standard procedure Yousef, if allied start harrasing you just ask them why they are bothering as HSBC have failed to comply with your lawful request under the CCA. HSBC are also breaking the regulations by passing on the account while in lawful dispute

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

This account has now been passed onto Capquest debt management.

Can someone help me , on advise about these people.

I spoke to them on phone, asking why my account is getting passed around as yet hsbc or other debt agenciesa have not provided what i asked for (cca), they are very rude, telling me they dont have to provide any information, as they are interested in money only. so I hung up.

I have received few letters from them, and most recent one telling me they are going to apply for a court order, where baliffs will take goods fom home etc, so to aavoid this get in contact.

Should I be worried???

Should I send them a request for a cca request to them?

Edited by yousef1973
Link to post
Share on other sites

Should i just ignore the litigation letter from cap quest,

 

you MAY indeed ignore the litigation letter from capquest. i think you will find that the capquest litigation letter is printed in their legal department THE NEAREST TOILET IN THEIR OFFICE!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...