Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins in Westminster - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA - say defaulted me but send a default notice???


willtheywontthey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4678 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 240
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

somehow got googled to the tpuc forum a few weeks back - ddn't read rest of site., go back to it , it has some v good remedys you wont find on mainstreeam sites Anyhow am sending off the contract 'prove it' letter to these Credite Experto lot. Am now wondering rationale ehind MBNA selling some to Link and some to Credite Expertos... ?
same method/Notice applies, have they sold the debt or are they just acting as agents....?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks all.

 

the letter is in this thread somewhere as posted by nuke em.

 

will try to read that site but find it difficult still sneaking on here so partner does not know details. our fiances separate so that is why. do not like him knowing and would be same way if I had savings so that is just me.

 

typing on mobile so apologies for typos and lack of links etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like you need to send them the same Notice

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Willtheywontthey,

The quote below by the venerable Richard Spud may throw more light on

Deeds of Assignment (the Deed being the document exchanged between the Bank and the DCA referencing the sale of the account)

The Notice of Assignment is the letter they are obliged to send to you notifying you of the assignment, and should, I believe, be sent by recorded delivery.

 

COPY OF DEED OF ASSIGNMENT OF A DEBT

 

It may help if I suggest that while there is no obligation for a Creditor Assignee to provide a copy of a DOA when a request is made by a Debtor under ss.77,78 of the CCA 1974, there is no restriction on requesting the voluntary production in support of a claim of assignment. However, I doubt if a Creditor Assignee (or indeed the Assignor) would provide this information as the DOA would undoubtedly contain the consideration (the sum) paid by the Assignee. Nevertheless, I submit that if proceedings have been instigated in the County Court by the Creditor Assignee, then I believe the Defendant Debtor could serve on the Claimant a Part 18 Request For Clarification And Further Information (under the Civil Procedure Rules) referring to the DOA and enquiring if it is to be pleaded. I understand that a response is required to by way of a Statement Of Truth and any copy documents on which the Claimant intends to rely should be annexed thereto –the original documents to be produced at a subsequent hearing for inspection by the Court and the Defendant.

 

I assume that it is known that for a legal assignment (as opposed to an equitable assignment) of a debt to have effect so that the Assignee can sue in their/its own name, the requirements of the Law of Property Act 1925 need to be fulfilled and that the assignment is not effective until the Debtor has received a Notice of Assignment – not the date when the Notice of Assignment was posted. Consequently, should a Creditor Assignee be unable to provide evidence of service and the Defendant has not received a Notice of Assignment when proceedings have already been brought in the County Court then, I suggest, it might be reasonable to file an application for the Claim should be struck out on the grounds that Assignment has not been pleaded and that proceedings cannot be brought prior to the service of a Notice of Assignment.

 

Authorities to check:

 

Law of Property Act 1925 s.136

 

Holt v Heatherfield Trust Ltd [1942] 2 KB 1; Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes [1973] 2 All ER 476 [1973] 1 WLR 757

 

Having read through your whole thread I don't feel you should acknowledge the NOA if it wasn't sent recorded. If this goes to court they would need to prove you got it, as above.

Just my opinion, and I would welcome other input, but I would hang fire on this until they write again and show their hand.

Then send them the recommended CAG dispute letter on debt being passed on (HERE) on the basis that an illegible Credit Agreement does not fulfil your CCA request. Amend it carefully to suit and post on here before you send.

You should also plan to send MBNA a SAR at some stage soon, using THIS CAG template to get the full picture, making sure you also specify on there that you require a copy of the SIGNED credit agreement.

Hope this helps,

Understand completely about your OH..apart from anything else they just wouldn't understand what/why you're doing anything without genning up on Consumer Law on CAG first as we do!

Take care hon,

Elsa x

Edited by Undercover-Elsa
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Willtheywon'tthey,

How you doing hon? :)

Could you post up your letter for more input from other Caggers before you send it...

Regards,

Elsa xx

Hi wiltheywontthey,

 

Elsa is right, belt and braces, best to post the letter before it is sent. It is important to get the right letters to the right people and in the right order.

 

I have just quickly read through your thread. Excuse me if I have got it wrong.

 

In your first post, you ask if the letter that you have received from DCA is the deed of assignment. The Deed is between MBNA and the DCA. You are unlikely to get sight of this, until near the court case, if ever. They will kick and scream.

 

What you are looking for is a Notice of Assignment. This should have been sent to you by registered post, prior to MBNA selling the debt, advising you that they are selling the debt.

 

Sorry if I am going over old ground but:

 

1. Have you made a CCA request to MBNA or DCA. This is where you send £1 in an effort to gain a copy of your agreement.

 

2. Have you received a Default Notice from MBNA. This will make reference to being served under s87 of the act.

 

3. If you have received a Default Notice, there are 2 important dates on there. First is the date that the letter was sent, second is the date that they gave you to rectify the default by.

 

4. In addition, the amount required to rectify the default in the notice. Was it the full amount of the debt, or just arrears.

 

And finally for now, there are 2 types of assignment. You need to find that point out.

 

Vint

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks. had liked the Idea of sending the contract letter (see pages 2 I think on this thread) but since I had not received anything from oc and this dca letter was not registered then possibly you are right that I should ignore. or should it be a cca to the dca... or the contract letter.... or even nothing. am confused which route to take now with this dca.

 

1. cca asked, got from mbna ages back. two pages missing and not legible. also dodgy on prescribed terms so far. not sent to this dca.

 

2. DN of sorts from mbna. wanted total of debt not balance. dca wrote letter saying debt sold before pay by dnotice date. no termination letter or anything from mbna since this default notice.

 

3. think I did a thread at the time about dates and think date out by day or two because of post etc but pay in full biggest issue I think in what is allowed?

 

4. full amount,

 

I need to find stuff out you are right but being told also not to remind them of noa if they have not sent one if that makes sense? guess a sar should sort that out without being obvious??

 

thanks ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks. had liked the Idea of sending the contract letter (see pages 2 I think on this thread) but since I had not received anything from oc and this dca letter was not registered then possibly you are right that I should ignore. or should it be a cca to the dca... or the contract letter.... or even nothing. am confused which route to take now with this dca.

 

1. cca asked, got from mbna ages back. two pages missing and not legible. also dodgy on prescribed terms so far. not sent to this dca.

 

So this is faulty. Did you put the account in dispute?

 

2. DN of sorts from mbna. wanted total of debt not balance. dca wrote letter saying debt sold before pay by dnotice date. no termination letter or anything from mbna since this default notice.

 

I have looked again at the DN. This is faulty on 2 counts.

 

3. think I did a thread at the time about dates and think date out by day or two because of post etc but pay in full biggest issue I think in what is allowed?

 

4. full amount,

 

I need to find stuff out you are right but being told also not to remind them of noa if they have not sent one if that makes sense? guess a sar should sort that out without being obvious??

 

thanks ...

If you want, I can draft a simple letter for the DCA, just to tease the current situation out from them.

 

Just to simplify things.

 

1. MBNA have a faulty and illegible agreement.

 

2. MBNA have issued a faulty default notice, faulty on 2 counts.

 

3. Need to find out if DCA owns the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be inclined to send this to the DCA to start with.

 

Ref Account xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear xxxxxxxxx,

 

I was somewhat bemused to receive your letter of xxxxxxxxx 2009, the content of which is noted. No debt to your company is acknowledged.

Your letter states that you are the new owner of the alleged debt. Please confirm if this debt was sold to you under a Deed of Assignment, Absolute, or as an equitable assignment. Please note, I do not require sight of a copy of this deed, at this point, just confirmation of the type of assignment.

 

On xxxxxxxxxx 2009 I made a formal request to your client pursuant to s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. MBNA have failed to comply within the statutory time limit, supplying illegible and inadequate documentation. This alleged account was placed in dispute with MBNA on the xxxxxxxxx 2009. It should not be necessary to have to remind you that the provisions of s.78(6) now apply. These letters are enclosed.

 

In the circumstances, your current threat of legal action would appear to be a breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection and your attention is drawn to this guidance document.

Your attention is also drawn the ICO on Data protection, as passing details on to a third party while an account is in dispute is contrary to the Data Protection Act. I have previously issued letters to MBNA under s10 of this act. You may wish to refresh yourselves of the implications of ignoring the Data Protection Act.

Should you attempt litigation it will be vigorously defended and the failure to supply documentation under the CCA 1974 is a complete defence to any legal action and your actions will be considered vexatious and unlawful. The Court's attention will drawn to the above statutory breaches . Furthermore, I reserve the right to bring the conduct of your client to the Court when the issue of costs is being considered.

I would remind you that while this alleged account remains in dispute, that MBNA or indeed yourselves:

  • May not ask for payment against this account.
  • I am not obliged to offer any payment against this account.
  • Cannot register any data with a third party.
  • Cannot take any enforcement action, including registering Defaults.
  • Cannot pass the account on to a third party for collection.
  • Cannot sell the account.

I trust this out lines the situation and that you will take note of my comments, to avoid any further breaches of the Law, being committed by you or MBNA.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read the letter from this DCA again and they say it debt was bought by Varde Investments (Ireland) Ltd and under terms of agreement they (the DCA) has been appointed to recover any and all debt.

 

so do I send the letter from Vint (above) to these Varde people whoever they are or to the DCA - asking this because the DCA is acting on their behalf so I guess they do not have this assignment - unless of course they are in-house. Sorry not to have noticed this before even though it was in front of my face!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. That's great - but could you have a look at the 'contract' letter and tell me if that's to be sent at all?? It is different to usual method and has dfferent rationale so thought perhaps that would be a good one to use. see no 5 post on this thread..

Well, bears no relationship to any debt related letter that I know of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read the letter from this DCA again and they say it debt was bought by Varde Investments (Ireland) Ltd and under terms of agreement they (the DCA) has been appointed to recover any and all debt.

 

If they are the owners of the debt, then letter in post 5 most inapropriate. Your original creditor would need to issue you with a Notice of Assignment, informing you that your debt was being transferred. Do you have one of these?

 

so do I send the letter from Vint (above) to these Varde people whoever they are or to the DCA - asking this because the DCA is acting on their behalf so I guess they do not have this assignment - unless of course they are in-house. Sorry not to have noticed this before even though it was in front of my face!

Send the CCA request letter to the DCA chasing you and wait 14 working days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks - that makes sense. Don't want to encourage a legal NOA. Am thinking of sending three letters to overdose the DCA.

 

1. SAR (it creates work for them)

2. CCA - gives them extra hassle although they'll probably send illegible copy etc

and

3. the letter above with some additional information about other ongoing complaints about MBNA with ICO, FOS and the log OFT made about an MBNA complaint I made some while back. This should give them a picture that I'm not a push over?

 

Do I need to mention anything about their clients at all in the letter??

Link to post
Share on other sites

somebody linked earlier today to the correct updated CCA template - cannot find it. I need nappies I think as am absolutely useless today. I don't think it's the template library one?

 

On separate issue I thought they did not need to supply a 'true' copy of a cca???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hon.,

As far as I know, THIS is the current CCA.

Until we see what they send back, it's suck it and see, as some have wised up to the "true copy" loophole but some haven't.

If you send a SAR too, which I would advise, it needs to go to MBNA this also should include the agreement.

It's an evolving situation..largely thanks to CAG, because the more people who challenge and show they know their rights, the more the DCA's wriggle and squirm and try to find ways to avoid the issue.

Just stick with the tried and tested CAG templates, unless anyone proves to you that they've actually had success by other routes ;)

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great post - MBNA told me my debt (10k - mastercard) has been sold to Hilsden securities/DLC. They have written to me today saying ring now and enclosing a payment options form - which amongst other things asks about employment details/do I own my house etc. Idiots. My letter (or shall I just not bother sending!):

 

I am presuming that having purchased this alleged debt; you have also purchased the history, so I will ask that review all previous correspondence with MBNA for further detail.

 

I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond with you further on this matter.

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the agreement related to this account. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement, under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974.

2. A full statement of account.

3. A copy of any other documents referred to in the agreement.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), I am entitled to receive a copy of our credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act. Please note that under no circumstances should this payment be set aside any alleged debt. If you are unable to supply the documentation requested, this fee should be returned.

I understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

Please note that I am making a specific request that contact with me is in writing only and I will not deal or discuss this matter over the telephone. I will consider any contact by telephone as harassment and will make an appropriate complaint via my solicitor. Other actions I will consider harassment include (but not limited to):

- Threats of ‘home visits’ (you have absolutely no legal right to attend my home without my express permission)

- Attempts to contact any third parties without my express permission, including but not limited to my employer, neighbours or family

- Repetitive contact by post

- Any type of ‘postcard’ or similar sent without envelope

Please be aware, I have recently claimed (and won) a case for harassment against a company who breached the above requests.

I am presuming your company adheres to the OFTs Guidance on Debt Collection, together with those issued by the CSA.

I note your inclusion of a payment options form, which I have returned as I do not consider any of the questions on that form of direct relevance to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right got one letter sorted and have added the cca at the bottom.

 

phew and thanks ever so much to everybody. Much appreciated. Will update when I hear more from any of the parties. Now I'm off to hassle the CRA people on another thread!

 

Would be interested if others want to add to this thread regarding the topic of 'debts sold to dcas' as all advice and opinions always helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just found this identical situation - any ideas as to what MBNA are playing at?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/219440-default-notice-received-mbna.html

Have they sold it or is the DCA lying?

 

Is an overseas company allowed to buy / pursue etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...