Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive, and an untrained eye would not of seen what the seller had done.  Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.   
    • The economy grew by 0.6% in the first three months of the year, ending a shallow recession.View the full article
    • First of all it sounds as if your retailer is very decent and very responsible. This itself is unusual in these kinds of circumstances and I think we need to bear this in mind. The guarantee is not particularly relevant and in fact the dealer had a statutory duty to exercise a certain responsibility for your computer – probably for several years as their obligation under the consumer rights act. The dealer may not have known this and it simply acting out of a sense of moral responsibility and that is even more noteworthy. You've already suggested earlier that you didn't really want to cause problems for your retailer. I think that you will need the help of your retailer as well in order to get information and evidence. I suggest that you proceed against DPD – but before you do that – I suggest that you have a discussion with the retailer. Tell them that this is what you are going to be doing and you would like to have a copy of anything they have which relates to the special instructions which apparently your dealer has already informed you about in relation to where item should be left. Secondly, maybe you should tell your dealer about this site and also about this thread. I can imagine like many dealers who are frequently sending items by means of couriers, they have had things go missing. Tell them that we will be very happy to help them recover money for lost or damaged or stolen items – and that is regardless of whether or not they have purchased insurance. Apart from being very pleased to help your dealer recover items which have been lost by irresponsible parcel delivery companies, I think we need to encourage the complicity between you and them so they will be pleased to support you in your claim against DPD. It will be helpful if you can get a copy of the instructions that you have referred to above, and also if you can get some written evidence of your own instruction that your laptop should be left in a safe place. Have you done the reading on this sub- forum? You will need to do lots of reading of many of the similar stories on this sub- forum. They won't necessarily be against DPD but the principles will broadly be the same. Also read the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum in order to understand many of the principles involved. Getting your money back but be quick – but your chances of success are better than 90% that you can bank on it taking anything up to a year. Have you got anything in writing from DPD either refusing you or telling you that they won't discuss with you?  
    • Thank you for telling us the text of the letter you had from the police. As we don't seem to have come across this before, it would be really useful for us to see the original please. HB
    • Pasco has recalled 104,000 packs of sliced bread after rat remains were found in at least two packs.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Particulars of claim - Are these vague?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5250 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Amex have decided to issue a court claim against me but I have never received a default notice. Is proof of a default notice being served a requirement in order for them to issue court proceedings? If that is the case presumably I could ask them for proof of delivery of the default notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Old_andrew2018

What ever you decide you must take the claim seriously, IMHO Amex will state the notice was posted.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amex have decided to issue a court claim against me but I have never received a default notice. Is proof of a default notice being served a requirement in order for them to issue court proceedings? If that is the case presumably I could ask them for proof of delivery of the default notice.

 

send them a CCA request to confirm they have a copy of the original. dont wait until court...if they have it, you dont have a leg to stand on, unless it's full of errors

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sent me an application form masquerading as an agreement. There are flaws in rpescribed terms. I'm just going through the 'agreement' to identify what else is wrong with it.

 

For the purposes of this thread I was hoping if they hadn't sent me a default notice, or if they can't prove they sent me a default notice this would help my case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can somebody help please? I have been served notice of a claim by Amex. I have just found a thread which provides some information re using CPR31.14 and it includes some text that can be used in the CPR request re the 'particulars of claim' which is helpful because I want to see the original credit agreement document plus terms and conditions. However the example letter used on another thread lists items that can be included in a CPR request and mentions to delete them if not mentioned in the particulars of claim. PROBLEM - The agreement isn't specifically mentioned in the particulars of claim other than by implication (the claim is for money due for card services!)! Does that mean I can't ask to inspect the documenton at their premises or ask them to produce it in court (an inspection would be prefered)?

 

The particulars of claim states: Money due for Credit Card service supplied (credit card no. xxx etc) at the Defendant's request in statements rendered culmintaing (Date).

 

The letter from the other thread is pasted in below (note I would like to visit their premises to see the original agreement and default notice which I have never received. I don't think it has been assigned):

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

LETTER FROM THREAD Re: Claim form Received today

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored][delete if no such request was delivered]

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the assignment*

 

3 the default notice*

 

4 the termination notice*

 

5 [any other documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim]*

 

* delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim.

 

[Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

 

# delete if claim for a sum exceeding £5,000.00

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump - Grateful for help on my defense which has to be filed in just over a week. I've never done this before and I think I may have missed the opportunity to request documents under the CPR. It would have been nice if teh claim had gone to the correct address.

 

I have attached teh claim and the so called agreement.

So called agreement for CAG july09.pdf

Claim form CAG version2 july09.pdf

Edited by Hungryforinfo
Updating
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. What I got back was the application form attached in this thread, together with a covering letter stating 'Please find enclosed a copy of the agreement in reference to the above account. Please refer to the statements issued prior to cancellation for validation of your debt.'.

 

I haven't received a default notice or any other correspondence since the gareement was sent. Neither have I written back becuase I asked for a copy of all teh documentes mentioned in the agreement which were not sent. There are omissions such as the prescribed terms.

 

I am not sure if Amex have signed the agreement I have attached. It looks like some sort of stamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that is a beauty of a claim - I'll have a proper look at some point tomorrow - a couple of immediate thoughts they can't claim a collection charge neither can they claim statutory interest

 

You could really do with it being posted in the legal section

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for taking the time to take a look at the claim. I hope you can find time tomorrow (today now!) to come back to me particularly with regards to th ecomments 'they can't claim a collection charge neither can they claim statutory interest!'

 

Just for awareness I am mindful of a separarte thread on a more fundamental issue refarding their right to make their claim in the first place as this depends in part on their ownership of the debt. It seems that there is more than a reasonable probability that Amex have sold off the debt and therefore do not have the legal right to ask for payment. There is a separate thread on this issue. If time allows, I would love to ask them to prove they own the debt (appears unlikely given the information I have received to-date).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its pretty obvious what they are going to try and pull,

They have an application form and no executed agreement. But they'll try to convince the judge that you owe money by producing statements.

Your arguments need to press home the fact that no agreement exists between you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am attaching a couple of other docs in the hope I can get some help with my defense particularly with appropriate wordings or templates. The docs I am attaching here are a default notice sent to me about a month before I sent a CCA request so teh default notice sneaked in under the wire. The other document is a termination notice.

 

I could still use some help with knowing have I missed the boat on asking for documents using the CPR (I think it is) as I have to submit my defense by 28thJuly inclusive at the latest. I am hoping I can do this all online.

CAncellation of account notice Amex june2008 CAG.pdf

Default notice Amex CAG version june08.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Sorry, I didnt make myself clear,

The DN was dated 13th June 2008, when did you receive it? was it posted first or second class? what was the date required to rectify the arrears?

If they didnt give you 14 days, then the DN is faulty for one.

They have already terminated the account, so I trust they havent sent any further DN out after termination.

It'll help your case if you get everything in chronological order, IE. on XXXX date they sent DN, on XXXX I sent CCA request, etc etc.

Youre going to have to get organised so you can tackle amex.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a date of receipt at hand and will check to see if I have the envelope the DN was sent in in order to see when it was posted and if it was first or second class if it is needed. There is no speciifc date for rectifying the breach. However, the notice states words to the effect that 'to remedy this breach payment is to be received within 14 calender days from the date of the default notice'. Does this make the default notice invalid and if so what legislation can I cross reference this too?

 

There has not been any further DN's received.

 

As suggested I will compile the information I have in correspondence with Amex which isn't much.

 

I am attaching a copy of the DN with this post.

Default notice Amex CAG version june08.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Does this make the default notice invalid and if so what legislation can I cross reference this too?'

 

Thats why its important to know when they posted it and when you received etc, so you got the full 14 days as quoted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this case it doesn't matter too much when the DN was posted as it doesn't specify an actual date to rectify, but says " ... must be received within fourteen calendar days from the date of this Default Notice", thereby not allowing any days for service.

 

So defective DN;

 

and

 

Unenforceable agreement as it is an application form containing no prescribed terms.

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob,

 

Thanks so much for the information. I could use some help in knowing how I present these deficiencies in my defence i.e. suggested wordings (a template anywhere?) presumably with a reference to the appropriate regulation that is breached.

 

 

With regard to the prescribed terms, I have read elsewhere that creditors may try and present a reconstructed agreement and dupe the court into believing they are a true copy. I was hoping to to mitigate against this by using the CPR (I am not familiar with the procedures at the moment) to get visability of the original document at the Amex offices pre the court case. I am not sure if I have to do this before my defense is submitted next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rob,

 

Thanks so much for the information. I could use some help in knowing how I present these deficiencies in my defence i.e. suggested wordings (a template anywhere?) presumably with a reference to the appropriate regulation that is breached.

 

 

With regard to the prescribed terms, I have read elsewhere that creditors may try and present a reconstructed agreement and dupe the court into believing they are a true copy. I was hoping to to mitigate against this by using the CPR (I am not familiar with the procedures at the moment) to get visability of the original document at the Amex offices pre the court case. I am not sure if I have to do this before my defense is submitted next week.

 

There are lots of threads on the forums with good winnable defences in them, you could have a look in the successes forum;

DCA Legal Successes - The Consumer Forums

 

My own particular winning thread (only made possible by other CAGgers help, especially pt2537), which is based on similar circumstances to your own, and may contain exactly what you are looking for is here;

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/124572-hfc-no-agreement-amended.html

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just seen your reply. Thanks so much I'll have a hunt.

 

If anyone knows what I can do as far as my defense is concerned on the points raised by I've Got No Money's comment in post 6 I would like to hear about it. Post 6 comment was 'a couple of immediate thoughts they can't claim a collection charge neither can they claim statutory interest'

 

My comment - Does this invalidate their claim and can I cross reference to any regulation which confirms they can't charge a collection charge or statutory interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...