Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie hall


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Had a letter today say the above named company are sanctioning a doorstep visit to my property for a debt from 1998. I have told them I dont know the company but they got very abusive on the phone........

 

Help!!!! what shall i tell the man who comes to the door????

 

I know what I'd like to do to him but as I am in a job where I need an enhanced CRB. Violence is not an option:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that babybear.... Printed and will be on there way in the morning.

 

dcakiller I knew about the statute barred and I did tell them on the phone. Their reply was if this was the case they would not be sending me letters...... After that the not so nice scotts man hanged up..... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO not beleve them it is statute barred after six years if you have not made a payment or writen admission of the debt. If this applys to you then send the jokers this

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to CPUTR2008

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

Do not sigh letter

If they do not back off report them to oft and trading standards

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad to see your not so concerned about this now Hawky, thats the spirit !! :D

 

Well done BB and DCAkiller too, sound advice on the thread.

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having told MHall to go away you must report the cretins to the OFT if they continue to call, write or visit. They have already had one slap by the OFT for misbehaviour and the more complaints the regulators get about the Kilmarnock Kowboys the better it will be for everybody.

 

As for their "sanctioning a doorstep visit" that's just bulls&*^&*. Doorstep visitors have no right of entry and if you don't want to talk to them you don't have to. If they don't leave when you ask them report them to the police. Use the non-emergency number and tell them a man/woman is on your property and you fear a breach of the peace could occur.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My local trading standards gave me a number to call. nailpost is right you must report them as they have been slaped for missleading people as to statute barred debts. Remeber it is up to mac hall to prove it is not staute barred and not up to you to prove that it is. Also once you tell them that you will not be paying due to the debt being sb they MUST STOP calling an d sending you letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hawky, great to see you're sound advice and very true. Your case is very very similar to mine lol. They're very good at putting the phone down mid conversation especially when they know they don't have a leg to stand on. My thread,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/210999-mackenzie-hall.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having told MHall to go away you must report the cretins to the OFT if they continue to call, write or visit. They have already had one slap by the OFT for misbehaviour and the more complaints the regulators get about the Kilmarnock Kowboys the better it will be for everybody.

 

As for their "sanctioning a doorstep visit" that's just bulls&*^&*. Doorstep visitors have no right of entry and if you don't want to talk to them you don't have to. If they don't leave when you ask them report them to the police. Use the non-emergency number and tell them a man/woman is on your property and you fear a breach of the peace could occur.

 

and if a breach of the peace DOES occur perhaps by you (or perhaps your 16 stone rugby playing son) ejecting him from the premises after refusing a request to leave and using reasonable force as necessary yu can rest assured that any police offer attending WILL in order to prevent a further breach of the peace order HIM not to re attend at the property (having first taken all his pesonal details)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police officer could also arrest the "doorstep collector" and he could be charged with breach of the peace (actually it would be a summons) and if convicted by magistrates face a fine. More than likely he/she would get a conditional discharge which means the collector would have to behave for a period of up to two years. Repeating the "offence" would lead to a stiffer penalty. In other words make it impossible to work as a collector. Doorstep collectors are usually self-employed and depend on commission and they generally know the score - its a pity their bosses don't have the same vision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking forward to my doorstep 'assessment', I don't think he will be arguing with me about it, im not exactly small at 18.5 stone and 6ft 4 lol

 

then remember if he fails to leave your property (including to the boundary) when asked to do so then he becomes a tresspaser and you may eject him from the premises using whatever reasonable force is necessary!!

 

thumb and forefinger will probably be enough given your size!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

One good story about a doorstep collector occurred near where I live. the alleged debtor (who in fact was not the person they were after) was visited by a very aggressive doorstep collector. The householder was , in fact well known around here as a bare knuckle boxer. The collection visitor, when he was released from hospital, decided to pursue another career. As there were several "witnesses" to the fact that the visitor had attempted to force his way into the genleman's home, the police took no further action

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

One good story about a doorstep collector occurred near where I live. the alleged debtor (who in fact was not the person they were after) was visited by a very aggressive doorstep collector. The householder was , in fact well known around here as a bare knuckle boxer. The collection visitor, when he was released from hospital, decided to pursue another career. As there were several "witnesses" to the fact that the visitor had attempted to force his way into the genleman's home, the police took no further action

 

ha ha ha bet he got a shock when he was picking up his teeth, he was probably used to bulling his way in to peoples homes. hope the nhs did not pay for his treatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had 'dealings' with these clowns a few months ago.

 

Chasing me for a old M&S debt which Cabot bought. They sent me usual threatogram which I replyed with the SB letter.

 

They wrote to me again and I casually reminded them that they have been warned by the OFT for persuing debts that are Statute Barred and continuing to press for payment when told that I will not pay them a penny.

 

They soon went away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jb, I hope you have reported their "slip-up" to OFT. The more complaints about these people the better. I would bet they would explain it away by saying it was an "administrative error" but there's a limit to the numbner of times someone can get away with that old chestnut.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jb, I hope you have reported their "slip-up" to OFT. The more complaints about these people the better. I would bet they would explain it away by saying it was an "administrative error" but there's a limit to the numbner of times someone can get away with that old chestnut.

 

Yes I did, I was not letting them get away with it. Every nail in their coffin as they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your replies.

Its good to know I am not the only one dealing with these -------.!!

 

Will keep you posted on what happens now I have blasted off my letters in Sat post... Recorded of course :)

 

Won't be able to scare the doorstep hooker as I am a lady :) BUT have a tounge that is very sharp according to my nearest and dearest.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...