Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There's no facility for a settlement "out of court" as such. But matters that are started under the "Single Justice" (SJ) Procedure can often be concluded without the defendant appearing. The SJ procedure, as the name suggests, involves a single magistrate, sitting in an office with a legal advisor, dealing with matters "on papers" only. Nobody else can attend. The SJ deals with straightforward guilty pleas. Anything where the SJ believes the defendant should appear, or which should be dealt with by the "ordinary" court are adjourned o a hearing in the normal magistrates'  court .As well as this, all defendants have the right to a hearing in the normal court if they wish. Nobody is forced to have their case heard under he SJP.  In particular, as far as traffic matters go, a SJ will not disqualify a driver and if a ban is to be considered, the case will be passed over to the normal court. Because, following your SD, you will be pleading Not Guilty (and offering the "deal"), your case would usually be heard in the normal court, meaning a personal appearance. To be honest, performing your SD at the court is a more straightforward way of doing things. It avoids any possible hitches involved in serving he SD on the court. But of course, as I said, most courts have backlogs which mean an SD may not be quickly accommodated. If you do end up doing your SD before a solicitor, check with them the protocol for serving it on the court. Do let us know what the solicitor says about Wednesday.    
    • Welcome to posting on CAG cabot, people will be along soon to help you try to sort this out. Please complete this:  
    • Quotes of the day penny mordaunt came out swinging with her broadsword, and promptly decapitated sunak while Nigel Farage, representing Reform UK, made contentious claims about immigration policies, which were swiftly fact-checked during the debate.   Good question though raised at labour about the 2 child benefit cap, which I broadly agree with, but the tory 'trap' assumes tory thinking - rather than child centric thinking. There should be no incentives to have kids as a financial way of life paid for by everyone else ... ... BUT the kids should not be made to suffer for the decisions of their parents Free school meals would feed the kids, improve their ability to learn, and incentivise them to go to school. As an added benefit ... it would invest in our nations future.   How far this should go is a matter for costing, social intent and future path of the nation, but not feeding our nations kids is an abomination. There should be at least one free school meal per day for every child who attends school. Full Stop. Its the cheapest and most effective investment in our future we could make.
    • Hey people, I've been browsing this amazing forum for the past year and recieved a letter today which has made me require some help. Received a claim form from Cabot in the Civil National Business Centre in regards to an Aqua Credit Card taken out in 2018. I failed to make payments due to financial hardship and have not taken out any credit or uses any forms of credit since. Received a lot of letters from Cabot and their solicitors Mortimer Clarke which I've ignored    By an agreement between New Day Ltd RE Aqua& the Defendant on or around 26/03/2018 ('ths Agreement) New Day Ltd RE Aqua agreed to issue Defendant with a credit card. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. The Agreement was assigned to the named Claimant. Cabot Credit Management Group Limited, acting as servicing agent of the named Claimant through its Appointed Representative (Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited), has arranged for these proceedings to be issued in the name of the Claimant. The named Claimant may be entitled to claim interest under the Agreement but does not seek such interest and instead claims interest under Section 69(1) of the County Courts Act 1984 at 8% p.a.from03/03/2023 until date of issue only, or alternatively such interest as the Court thinks fit THE NAMED CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 3800.82 2. INTEREST OF 379.84 3. Costs How would I go about this and what could happen? I don't remember much details about the card either.
    • cause like you said in post one, 99% of people think these are FINES (it now reads charge). and wet themselves and cough up. they are not, they are speculative invoices because the driver supposedly broke some imaginary contract by driving onto privately owned land which said owner may or may not have signed some 99% fake contract with a private parking co years ago, thats already expired or has not been renewed or annually paid to employ them dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Distance selling, and returning goods


ratlover
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have this morning received goods from an online retailer and they have arrived thus.

 

One item is broken.

The other item has been replaced with an inferior quality product without them contacting me for my approval to do so.

 

I have emailed them to ask for them to pick them all up and refund me.

 

Now, is it within my right to demand that they pick up the items at their cost, or is it down to me to incur further postage costs to sent it back?

 

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi!

 

I am happy to confirm that as per the Distance Selling Regulations your only responsibility is to immediately notify them of the goods being damaged / incorrect and then to "restore" them to the supplier.

 

"Restoring" is a messy word but it means you have to keep them in good condition and available to the supplier. You do not have to send them , if they want them back they have to get them back! They might ask you to send them to them, if you do keep a copy of this request and ensure the request confirms you will be refunded the cost.

 

Hope that helps!

 

Fin

 

source: Distance Selling (Mail Order, Telephone and Internet Shopping) Fact Sheet - BIS department for Business Innovation & Skills

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's incorrect tf.

 

You have a right to reject by giving them notificatin in writing within 7 'working' days, starting the day after you receive them, that you wish to reject the goods. Under DSR you can do this for any reason, ie; wrong colour etc; Who pays the postage for return depends on their terms and conditions.

Where they explain the DSR (if they haven't they are breaking the law) they must tell you who is responsible for the return postage cost. They can pay for them or they can say you have to pay for the return. If there is nothing, then they pay for the return.

 

In the case of damaged or wrong goods, (your problem), you should notify them and you can either send them back at your cost, or ask them to arrange collection, but they 'must' reimburse you that return postage cost as well as the purchase price and the delivery cost (if there was any). They have 30 days in which to refund you all the cost.

 

Just to add. The refund countdown begins with the time you sent them the letter/email and not from the time they pick up or receive the goods.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh ok, i just took it litterally of the government website as quoted. I would imaging what you have described is the best practice method from the OFT which has been drawn up based on the legislation.

 

Either way its good news for ratlover!

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to who pays,

 

If it is returned due to a breach of contract / rights (including implied terms), then the seller pays. They cannot contract otherwise, and any term that says so is ineffective. They must refund postage if they do not pay for it initially.

 

Where it is due to a right to return but there being no breach (i.e, returned under the "cooling off" period), then it is the responsibility of the seller to pay postage unless the contract says otherwise.

 

As connif said, the countdown begins from the day the notice of cancellation is received, and the seller cannot insist on the goods being received before the refund is made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, a big thankyou everyone who has replied :)

 

I have (I hope) one more question...

 

The retailer has agreed to arrange for collection on Wednesday 21-07-2009, now what are my rights regarding making sure I get some sort of receipt or proof of sending back?

 

What do I need to look out for from courier?

Will the courier give me some paperwork, or will I have to insist on some kind of receipt?

 

I ask, because when I was younger and a lot more naive a courier returned to pick up something I'd bought mail order, but I didn't get anything to prove I had returned the item. To cut a long story short, even with the help of the CAB I was unable to get either my money or item back!

 

Thanks again.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any decent courier should leave some docket to say it has been picked up. In any case, the seller is responsible for it's return. Once you have given it to them, it is out of your hands. You could always make a note of the drivers name, their description, vehice reg etc etc.

 

Like I said earlier, the seller cannot insist on the goods being received before giving a refund. If something did go wrong, they would have to reimburse you and then if they wanted take separate action.

 

Not that they'd have much chance in succeeding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update...

 

Courier picked up this morning 09:30:), great no waiting around for them.

 

Before I handed the parcel over I asked if I would get any paperwork or receipt and he said he could give me a receipt, so off he pops back to the van.

 

He comes back saying he hasn't got any but have I got a piece of paper?. I said "Here's somthing I prepared earlier", explaining I had been shafted before not having proof of returning goods.

 

So I had knocked up (as suggested) a simple form stating...

 

This document hereby confirms that on the 22-07-2009:

 

COMPANY NAME:...........................................................

 

COURIERS NAME:..........................................................

 

TIME OF COLLECTION:...................................................

 

COURIERS VAN REGISTATION:.......................................

 

 

COURIERS SIGNATURE:...................................................

 

 

Collected a parcel for return to:

 

(Return address removed)

I had already got my digital camera ready, as I even thought about asking my Son to video the exchange! :lol:

 

I checked the bank this morning however, and still no refund. Anyway they have 25 days left to comply with the regulations.

 

It's great that we have forums like this where we can exchange experiences and help, and I hope that maybe one day this thread will provide good reference for someone else who needs a little help.

 

 

Thank's for reading.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and I hope that maybe one day this thread will provide good reference for someone else who needs a little help.

 

That is why we like to know the outcome, so others can learn from these experiences.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick update.

 

Still no refund.

 

Amazing how quick they can take your money, isn't it?

If I do get the refund, I bet they hold off until the very last minute of the 30th day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...