Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. You contacted directly with the parcel broker so your best option is to proceed directly against them for breach of contract. I hope you have read enough to understand that you will not be able to rely on the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Do you understand why? Have Parcel to Go giving you a reason for declining reimbursement? Do you have anything in writing from your customer which shows that they did not refuse delivery and which identifies the actual circumstances of the situation?
    • Which Court have you received the claim from?  CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE, NORTHAMPTON Name of the Claimant?  LOWELL PORTFOLIO LTD How many defendant's joint or self?  SELF Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  03 MAY 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £6000 DUE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER AN AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 FOR A LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC ACCOUNT WITH AN ACCOUNT REFERENCE OF (ACCOUNT NO. 16 DIGITS LONG). THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT AND A DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UNDER S.87(1) OF THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH. THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON (DATE) NOVEEMBER 2016 NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT. THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUORY INTEREST UNDER S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FOR THE DATE PF ASSIGNMENT TO THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUMBE OF £0.00. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE SUM OF £6000. What is the total value of the claim? £6500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? YES, NOTICES OF CLAIM.  Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  YES  Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  NO Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  CREDIT CARD When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007?  BEFORE   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post?  I DONT RECALL   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  NO   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  DEBT PURCHASER.   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? THE FIRST I RECALL WAS A LETTER FROM LOWELL SAYING THEY NOW OWNED THE DEBT.  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  NOT THAT I RECALL OR BEEN PROVIDED WITH THROUGH CCA REQUESTS.AT LAST REQUEST THEY SAID THEY WERE AWAITING THE DEFAULT NOTICE AND NO ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN UNTIL RESPONDED WHICH TO DATE I'VE NOT HAD OR SEEN.  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  NO, I RECEIEVED LETTERS OF CLAIMS   Why did you cease payments?  I WAS UNDER MEDICAL CARE WHICH CAUSED ME NOT TO WORK. AROUND THAT TIME LOWELL HAD WANTED ME TO INCREASE MY PAYMENTS AS IT WOULD TAKE TOO LONG TO CLEAR THE DEBT. I HAD BEEN PAYING THEM WHAT I WAS PAYING THE BANK. I EXPLAINED MY THEN HEALTH & FINANCIAL POSITION AND THAT I WAS UNABLE TO DO SO. THEY PUT A HOLD ON MY ACCOUNT FOR A FEW MONTHS SO I CANCELLED MY DIRECT DEBIT. I MADE A FULL AND FINAL OFFER WHICH WAS REJECTED. WHEN THEY WANTED PAYMENTS TO RESUME I EXPLAINED I WAS IN A WORSE FINANCIAL POSITION, STILL UNDERTAKING TREATMENT AND NOW UNEMPLOYED SO COULD NOT START PAYMENTS AS THEY WANTED. AFTER SENDING MY FINANCIAL SPREADSHEET THEY KEPT SENDING LETTERS ASKING WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO. I COULDN’T SEE A WAY FORWARD I FELT STREESSED AND UNDER PRESSURE SO WROTE THAT I WOULD NOT BE CORRESPONDING WITH THEM ANYMORE.    What was the date of your last payment? NOVEMBER / DECEMBER 2018   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I COMMUNICATED MY FINANCIAL PROBLEMS WITH THE CREDIT CARD COMPANY, WE MADE A MONTHLY PAYMENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS KEPT FOR SEVERAL YEARS UNTIL DEBT WAS SOLD.  
    • Perhaps you would care to read this and reflect on your continuing comparison of Israel to Nazi Germany Jugg    ALEX BRUMMER: How grotesque of pro-Palestine protesters to besmirch Auschwitz, the place where my grandparents died WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK As the son of a refugee from the horrors of the Holocaust, I can feel nothing but contempt for the ignorance, gross... My elderly aunt Sussie and cousin Sheindy had been teenagers at Auschwitz and Belsen but survived and are alive to this day. What they will make of the protesters who waved flags, heckled and chanted as Israelis took part in the March Of The Living – the annual walk from Auschwitz to Birkenau – I cannot imagine. The images now circulating of the protesters are indescribably disturbing. They can only bring back memories of those final moments Sheindy shared with my grandparents when my grandmother Fanya squeezed her hand and told her to lie about her age to avoid the gas chambers. Claiming she was older, and could work, meant that Sheindy lived, not died. The outrage perpetrated by Hamas on October 7 has brought back the most terrifying memories for these two women – memories of pillage, mutilation and starvation. The Holocaust, or Shoah to use the Hebrew word, was the deliberate, industrial-scale killing of Jews.  It is bad enough that pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas sympathisers have chosen to steal the language of the Holocaust.  Any comparison between Israel's retaliation and the monstrous genocide of the 1940s is odious and anti-Semitic
    • Thank you JK2054 and BankFodder for your replies. The information requested is as follows:   My wife and I are sole traders supplying bespoke, handmade wedding trays and other items through our website. We do not sell on ebay. We had an order for two trays (invoice value £370) that were shipped on Monday 25th March. We used P2G as the broker and Evri as the shipper. We declared the value but did not take out insurance. As the trays were a present for a wedding on Saturday 30th March we checked the progress of delivery on the Thursday to see that there had been an attempt to deliver on the 27th but the driver failed to deliver as the customer’s gate was shut (customer informs us that the gates are open between 7am-7pm. We contacted the customer who informed us she had been waiting in all week and there had been no attempt of a delivery. Evri allege they attempted to deliver on the 28th & 29th. On the P2G web site on the 4th April at 14.17 it stated that the customer refused delivery. At 14.28 it updated to say there was a problem with the address and at 14.32 updated to say the customer had refused delivery. At 14.35 updated again to say it was being returned. Last entry was on the 7th April that it was being processed at the depot. We never received it. I have had six web chats with P2G between the 4th-30th April. On the 26th April, I had an offer of £20 plus cost of delivery (£6.72) from P2G which I rejected. During this time, I also contacted Evri that resulted in an email from Evri Customer Services (20th April) stating that they had lost the parcel. I replied requesting details of the attempted delivery but received no reply. After emailing Evri again on the 23rd asking again for the information I received a phone call from someone called Haleemah on the 25th who apologised and promised to send an email with a link to submit a claim form. I subsequently received an email with the link which only took me to a page that stated “Page not found”. After informing Evri customer services of the problem (to which no reply was forthcoming) a couple of days later I retried the link but it only took me to the Evri website. I believe that I have a good case against both companies but would appreciate guidance on which path to go down. I have read most of the information on this site, which has been very helpful and much appreciated, particularly the various court transcripts. I appreciate that this process is a marathon and not a sprint and am fully aware that I need to get everything in the correct order before starting on the legal road. I am sure this covers the current position but if further info is needed please let me know.  
    • Everything at small claims revolves around informality and common sense, there are no "special" ways to have to do things. The site manager's WS will be like yours and the one I linked to - just much shorter.  There need to be the introductory hearings about the case, the parties, etc., and the concluding Statement of Truth. In the middle just a couple of paragraphs where they say who they are, how they know you, and about permission being given by the landowner to use the car park. Superb.  I've added another section about the signage to the suggested WS sections three posts above. Yes, it's perfectly possible.  It'd be a good idea to phone the court on the 18th to see if they have paid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell and Barclaycard debt poss SB'd


Azuma
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5294 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

lol, reminds me of a response PGH gave me previously, he / she said i should send a letter of the following:

 

Dear Cretins

 

Thank you for pointing out that an ATTEMPT to pay was ATTEMPTED on date - I would be curious to know how this ATTEMPTED ATTEMP was ATTEMPTED and who actually ATTEMPTED to ATTEMPT to make this ATTEMPTED payment.

 

It certainly was not me I would be very foolish to acutally make an ATTEMPTED payment for a debt that is alledgedly mine, so the question remains, who did try to ATTEMPT this ATTEMPTED ATTEMP at making an ATTEMPTED Payment.

 

When you discover the the identity of the ATTEMPTED payee pleasein form me as I would like to report them to the police for identity theft for making the ATTEMPTED ATTEMPT at the ATTEMPTED ATTEMP to ATTEMPT the payment.

 

I hope that this ATTEMPT to set the record straight reference the ATTEMPTED ATTEMPT to ATTEMPT to make an ATTEMPTED payment is understood.

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

Although i was very tempted, i decided not to get involved with this game of cat and mouse they so obviously enjoy playing with people :rolleyes:

 

Az :D

 

love that letter :lol::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha you think they could have been inventive and picked a different month/year from the other letters weve seen on this site :-D

 

 

[edit] Oh and it this is lowells new tactic at attempting to side step the OFT guidelines on SB debts then we need to collate all the cases this happens and inform the OFT as obviously the few we see on here will be the tip of the iceberg

 

S.

 

i know man, i was thinking the same thing, there have been other letters by Caggers on here saying an "attempted" payment made in Feb 2005.

 

We def need to collate all the instances as you say, i can scan up my letter (removing all data if need be) perhaps make another thread for people to put up their versions of this "attempted payment" letter?

 

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi andie

ill now have a dig

 

helping brother out ref mbna

he got a nice letter from lowell saying the debt was now belonged to them.

in the same envelope was a letter from sainsburys saying they had sold the debt to lowells, thats righ, same envelope.

 

i have 100%proof both letters came off the same printer at lowells.

 

digging into how lowells can use company letterheads, realy bad cut and paste, and signatures from the oc.

 

by the way

 

i delievered 10 of the exact same letters to people that morning so it seems lowells have got a load of hbos accounts

 

I hope you put a CAG fact sheet through the letterbox as well postggj? :D

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know man, i was thinking the same thing, there have been other letters by Caggers on here saying an "attempted" payment made in Feb 2005.

 

We def need to collate all the instances as you say, i can scan up my letter (removing all data if need be) perhaps make another thread for people to put up their versions of this "attempted payment" letter?

 

Az

 

Why not just send them a letter that says... "Ok, if you think your view on this matter will stand up in court then invite you to take me to said court and we'll see wht the judge makes of it"... "By the way, I do not acknowledge any debt to your company."

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the Lowells data matrix ? is it a graphic ? How do you identify if it's off the same printer (both Sainsbury and Lowell headed paper) ?

 

The dot matrix is a little square at the top of the letter. It allows the letter to be identified. Its just an updated barcode but the Leeds Losers are so thick they put the same dot matrix of the letter that is allegedly from Sainsburys as they do on the threatomatic they send introducing themselves to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not just send them a letter that says... "Ok, if you think your view on this matter will stand up in court then invite you to take me to said court and we'll see wht the judge makes of it"... "By the way, I do not acknowledge any debt to your company."

 

If i thought it would do ANY good at all i would.

 

However I don’t really wish to give them the time of day by responding. If they had anything that would stand up in court, that’d be their first course of action. They have already proven themselves to have no morals or problem with using any and every tactic they can to screw people out of their money, as such if they thought they would win in court I think it’d be the first place they would go.

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Feb 2005 date and the so called ATTEMPTED PAYMENT probably refers to when the OC sold the alleged debts on to the parasitic DCAs. Its not unknown for a token payment to be shown in order to increase the shelf life of a debt.

 

Obviously if the Leeds Losers had a good case then they would take you to Court. People can now see through them and other DCAs and are not as easily fooled by thei untruths and empty threats.

 

Sufficient to know that this site and others are hitting the **** where it hurts, in their pockets. As the threat monkeys see their monthly blood money bonuses slowly shrink thjen they will resort to more outlandish threats in order that they may earn enough for their weeky alcopops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Feb 2005 date and the so called ATTEMPTED PAYMENT probably refers to when the OC sold the alleged debts on to the parasitic DCAs. Its not unknown for a token payment to be shown in order to increase the shelf life of a debt.

 

Obviously if the Leeds Losers had a good case then they would take you to Court. People can now see through them and other DCAs and are not as easily fooled by thei untruths and empty threats.

 

Sufficient to know that this site and others are hitting the **** where it hurts, in their pockets. As the threat monkeys see their monthly blood money bonuses slowly shrink thjen they will resort to more outlandish threats in order that they may earn enough for their weeky alcopops.

 

It does give me a warm feeling inside to know that they are feeling the effects.

 

On the subject of the "attempted payment" - this isn't when they OC sold the debt onto the DCA, as the first letter i got from them stated that the date Lowell bought that debt was November 2008, but once i SB lettered them, they came back with the "attempted payment was made 17th Feb 2005" statement.

 

Cretins :mad:

 

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

A subject access request to whoever owned the debt at the time of "attempted payment" should sort this once and for all...another Cagger I'm helping did this and proved them wrong.

Goes against the grain though as it's up to these muppets to prove it so why should anyone have to cough up £10 :(

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

A subject access request to whoever owned the debt at the time of "attempted payment" should sort this once and for all...another Cagger I'm helping did this and proved them wrong.

Goes against the grain though as it's up to these muppets to prove it so why should anyone have to cough up £10 :(

Elsa x

 

Yeah, i'm not going to prove my case, "innocent until proven guilty" :D

 

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another of their favourites is 'it's not statute barred because the default was registered on.....' They can't seem to grasp the fact that the clock starts usually a month after the last payment became due.

 

Exactly what i thought, not "when the last 'attempted payment' was made" haha, idiots!

 

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, i'm not going to prove my case, "innocent until proven guilty" :D

 

Az

The burden of proof that a debt is NOT Statute Barred rests with the DCA in this case the Leeds Losers

 

A subject access request to whoever owned the debt at the time of "attempted payment" should sort this once and for all...another Cagger I'm helping did this and proved them wrong.

Goes against the grain though as it's up to these muppets to prove it so why should anyone have to cough up £10 :(

Elsa x

The burden of proof rests with the DCA. There is no way I would pay them £10

 

Another of their favourites is 'it's not statute barred because the default was registered on.....' They can't seem to grasp the fact that the clock starts usually a month after the last payment became due.
This is a favourite ploy of Crapbots. Again there is no legal basis for it. Just a blatant attempt at deceit.

 

 

Call the Leeds Losers bluff

Link to post
Share on other sites

The burden of proof that a debt is NOT Statute Barred rests with the DCA in this case the Leeds Losers

 

The burden of proof rests with the DCA. There is no way I would pay them £10

 

This is a favourite ploy of Crapbots. Again there is no legal basis for it. Just a blatant attempt at deceit.

 

 

Call the Leeds Losers bluff

 

What do you mean by call their bluff? do you mean ignore and see if they take any further action?

 

I can GUARANTEE that i will get more letters from these losers in the coming weeks/months/years lol, whatever i get i'll post up and will look forward to seeing your responses on the blatant C**P they will spout next.

 

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would positively invite them to take legal action against you. They tried this ploy on with me. They said I had made not one but two payments on a CAPONE account. Unfortunately for them it was a Sunday and I was in Miami. They were that stupid that they did not even check the calendar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam614 has a great situation with an attempted payment, that according to the DCA was attempted by his/her sister, even though she was in hospital after giving birth the day before, and the attempt was on a sunday! If they do come back to you with a specific date, i would suggest checking what day of the week it was, you never know it could also be a sunday. Maybe they have evidence of you standing outside your bank on a sunday shaking your head wondering why you can't pay this DCA.

 

this was westcot,with my sis

they claimed this date twice and claimed that they had the paying in slip:eek:

then it was lost but OC confirmed it,as stated by westcot

so we went back to OC as all details had been received in SAR.

they had a copy of the letter send to them and wrote back 2 weeks ago saying that they were contacting westcot.

letter back from westcot accepting statute barred.and it was a admin error.account closed.

it was been lying bar stools.:mad:

end of they think.

till they get her bill for postage costs/time and stress.

 

 

SAM(LADY)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's crazy that these DCA's try and get away with mis-leading and totally untrue stories to get people to pay something - i wish there was something more we could all do. unfortunately i have another letter from them, but i'm at work right now, but will be sure to post up when i get home tonight.

 

Who knows what cock and bull story they have invented this time huh?

 

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's crazy that these DCA's try and get away with mis-leading and totally untrue stories to get people to pay something - i wish there was something more we could all do. unfortunately i have another letter from them, but i'm at work right now, but will be sure to post up when i get home tonight.

 

Who knows what cock and bull story they have invented this time huh?

 

Az

 

That will probably be one of their ridiculous once in a lifetime discount offers. In other words they are stuffed

Link to post
Share on other sites

That will probably be one of their ridiculous once in a lifetime discount offers. In other words they are stuffed

 

We shall soon find out ODC :D i'll let you know as soon as i get home.

 

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will go along the lines of................ We are waiting a response from out client and when we receive this you will be expected to pay in FULL. However in order to bring this matter to a conclusion wer are prepared to accept £ xxx (usually 60% discount) if you pay by XXXXX (usuall two days earlier).

 

Blah blah blah ring our threat monkeys on XXXXXXX to avail of this onve in a liftime CON TRICK as this may be the only chance we have to get some money from you.

 

Andy B or Samantha Swallow/Barnard

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will go along the lines of................ We are waiting a response from out client and when we receive this you will be expected to pay in FULL. However in order to bring this matter to a conclusion wer are prepared to accept £ xxx (usually 60% discount) if you pay by XXXXX (usuall two days earlier).

 

Blah blah blah ring our threat monkeys on XXXXXXX to avail of this onve in a liftime CON TRICK as this may be the only chance we have to get some money from you.

 

Andy B or Samantha Swallow/Barnard

 

Hahaha, sounds likely man, although i have not CCA'd them, as such i think the response won't be "we are getting files from archive" but more along the lines of "how could you do this to us? how can you ignore your responsibilities like this? you're a bad bad person Mr Azuma... pity you"

 

haha

 

Az

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...