Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If anybody has any advice here, it would be greatly appreciated, I already suffer with pre-existing disabilities & have struggled with this so far. 
    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sub Prime Mortgages Call For Evidence Before The Treasury Select Committee


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5412 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They hate the internet by the way. And I mean really hate it.

 

People spend more time on line now than they do watching mind crushing car crash I'm a celebrity gardener cook, talent xfactor, millionaire pet rescue.

 

They don't like that fact very much either.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 213
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks EiE

 

As I said im enquiring about a few thing, Cant say as ill get everything together in time before the deadline, as we all know real life problems keep us so busy!!!.

 

All we need is for more to step forward and do what we have all done here - its just getting enough people to visit this site (imparticular this page).

 

Ill post what I can wherever I can in the meantime and see if it helps.

 

As to the article - if we all make it as hard as possible for these people to get away with then that all we can do for now. Until the time comes that someone drops on them. I know from my enquiries and experiences that most of these types of organisations have multiple fronts.

 

Keep on with the fight ppl, whichever way it goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

re: Repossession (or anywhere else this could apply;))

 

I wonder has anyone thought of arguing 'FORCE MAJEURE’ in that because of loan securitization the terms & safeguards such as an adherence to the various codes of practice that existed at the beginning when the original contract was agreed no longer apply - that the contract has altered considerably to the borrowers utter detriment entirely without their knowledge or informed consent

 

It may be argued that the terms allow the lender to sell/off load the account or even alter the terms but contrary to any natural justice there is absolutely no mention that it will be to the entire detriment of the borrower. IMHO a borrower lay person would rightly expect that any transfer/sale would at least offer the same protections as the previous one whereas in these cases it's anything but

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid the problem with the press is that when you begin to explain the machinations of the lenders, even in the simplest of terms, you can see their eyes cloud over after about 2 minutes the reason they doubt there's much sympathy amongst their readers for the feckless dispossessed & there's no sound bite such as " home owner commits suicide" etc without explaining the reason why which is not the 'missed' payments & repo but that all to often the 'missed' payments are manufactured - yet despite all that has happened in the world of finance they (& their lawyers) still refuse to believe that lenders could be so dishonest as to forge the evidence even I might add when it's put in front of them

 

The MP's expenses whilst a scandal is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to these shenanigans

 

Any that are now showing some interest are those who realize that this situation can now befall almost anyone & not just the poor

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi joncris

 

re your force majeure post I totally agree. This is why I keep using the term operation of the contract. The operation is so at variance with the reasonable expectations of the average consumer and so detrimental to the cocept of fairness that there must be grounds for rescission. I'm not sure however that the district judges are going to be overly sympathetic to the argument preferring the old skool line of how much are the arrears and what can you afford. Perhaps as a last blast I might just say I can't afford it as I'm being held to ransom. Could this qualify as duress?

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it - however I suggest this not in the hope of rescinding the contract but in the hope that, at this stage anyway, the court will take into account not only the disparity between the parties but also the unfairness of the present contract & therefore be much more sympathetic to the borrower & exercised into finding more ways that allow them to keep their homes

Link to post
Share on other sites

A very fair point. Keep up the good work.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JonCris

 

could you possibly draw up a list of the enemy's spin and the committee's approach and pm it to me. I have a strong feeling I may get called but have unfortunately suffered an unexpected bereavment which is going to put me out of the loop for about a week.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi joncris

 

re your force majeure post I totally agree. This is why I keep using the term operation of the contract. The operation is so at variance with the reasonable expectations of the average consumer and so detrimental to the cocept of fairness that there must be grounds for rescission. I'm not sure however that the district judges are going to be overly sympathetic to the argument preferring the old skool line of how much are the arrears and what can you afford. Perhaps as a last blast I might just say I can't afford it as I'm being held to ransom. Could this qualify as duress?

 

I believe that to use 'duress' it has to be a major issue and under direct threat, usually physical violence. As you are free to seek legal help I doubt that would work. But I do know what you mean about being blackmailed into paying the arrears at the cost of all else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - my understanding (following valuable info from Carmel) is that breaching the court order applies to both sides. My lender is doing same thing, but, as the breach involves adding more charges I also believe that no-one can get a repo order based on fees and charges, only what is owed in actual payments - which has always had me wondering whether interest is being calculated with these erroneous sums included? (hope that makes sense)....

 

 

I used this in my original defence against my lender:

Residential Mortgage Repossessions and The Administration of Justice Acts, 1970 and 1973 – A case for Reform. L. M Clements, B.A., LL.M, Lecturer in Law, University of Hull.

 

“It is widely recognised that mortgage finance is extremely important to our economy and that it should continue to be freely available to persons having a broad spectrum of incomes. In order to ensure that this continues to be the case, Banks, Building Societies and other secured lenders clearly need assurances that their security is relatively safe. Nevertheless, the trend towards owner-occupation and the economic misfortunes of the past raise the issue whether increased protection should be given to mortgagors of residential property. Mortgagors do need protection not only against lenders who use their commercial weight to advantage, but also against external factors such as the consequences of economic recession. This article examines the current problems with mortgage repossessions and argue that reform is needed which will guarantee to mortgagors the protection of a court order in line with the protection afforded to residential tenants, whilst at the same time giving increased powers to the court in possession proceedings”…”There is no doubt that the State has played an important role in encouraging home ownership; but, having been encouraged to enter into home ownership by the State, mortgagors are then reasonably entitled to expect some degree of legal protection from the State. This is particularly the case when outside factors over which individuals have no control lead to wide-spread hardship and homelessness”.

The rights in the tenancy area being different.

Clements, 'Residential Mortgage Repossessions and The Administration of Justice Acts, 1970 and 1973 - A case for Reform.'

 

Hi Campari2,

 

Interest will have been added to the fees charged and once removed the whole sum has to be recalculated again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Suetonius,

 

It was worth a look and considering the wider implications avenue.

 

I'd like to ask your thoughts on court orders and waivers of the terms by the claimant. Would a non-waiver clause still be effective or would they have to apply for a variation?

 

As an example; If a claimant was granted a suspended repossession order and the defendent was required to meet the terms imposed by the judge. If the defendent or claimant vary those terms without court consent is it a breach of the order? Particularly in the case of the claimant. Would they still be able to rely on the court order and any previous or post contract non-waivers if they initiated the varied terms either written, orally or via their conduct?

 

I think I know half the answer but would appreciate a 2nd opinion. Hopefully you'll be able to understand what I've written as it's not always easy to convey what you mean, (when it's sweltering hot despite the fan on max!)

 

I should explain this a bit more and my reasons....

 

Parties to written contracts often include non-waivers which mean that if they agree to overlook a breach of it or vary the terms they still reserve their rights to enforce the contract. Your mortgage lender may do this when they allow you to pay off arrears over an extended period of time, change the date you pay or its terms although it isn't in line with the original contract.

 

Contract law states that you should enforce the agreement as soon as you are aware of the breach and if you vary the contract by agreement, either orally, in writing or by your action you lose your rights to enforce it.

 

Hence the non-waivers that are put into contracts as a condition that says they still reserve the right to enforce whatever they say or do to vary it (which could be by their mistake or agreement).

 

Non-waivers may not be as valid as the parties seem to think as a point of law. It's questionable if the innocent party doesn't act to enforce it as soon as is reasonable.

 

I'll post a bit more about this once you've managed to get your heads around it but you'll probably see what I'm getting at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JonCris

 

I hope you are well.

 

Regards your force majeure argument do you have any thoughts on how Diplock's ratio could apply. The real test is, as I see it, does breach destroy the purpose of the contract and is the force majeure line a way of demonstrating that as consumers we took on these loans either to have 'full enjoyment' or to clear debts, neither of which has been possible without the latter impinging upon the former or the former being made impossible.

 

I believe also that there is a common law principle of impossibility but this may be too difficult to sustain given that these barstewards don't even abide by laws subject to criminal prosecution. Anyway, for what it's worth, here it is.

 

In Hong Kong Fir Shipping Case (1962)

 

Diplock LJ said:

 

'The test whether an event has this effect or not has been stated in a number of metaphors all of which I think amount to the same thing: does the occurrence of the event deprive the party who has further undertakings still to perform of substantially the whole benefit which it was the intention of the parties as expressed in the contract that he should obtain as the consideration for performing those undertakings?'

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The courts are only interested in if the contract can still be performed and to put you back in the position you were in before the breach.

 

The inital contract is sound on the grounds that they secure the mortgage loan against your property and you will pay it off. It's the implied terms that are questionable as unfair and the conditions, which are additional and not vital to the performance of the contract.

 

By taking out the loans have we received any beneficial interest? This will be taken into account.

 

Compensation is certainly due as we have been subject to mis-selling and the companies may have breached the contract first or imposed unfair terms and conditions.

 

The Diplock case isn't valid in our arguement. The contracts can be performed, although not as we expected.

Edited by Crapstone
Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone found a firm of Solicitors that will take these cases on a fight? Every time I contact a firm they all appear to be enthusiastic until I send them the file and then they want £25,000 deposit

 

We need a good firm that does Public Funding in cases like these.

 

Any recommendations?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There must be some legal firm interested, its not just contractual stuff theyre playing games with.

 

How many people have left one branch of this firm and ended up back in their laps after paying ridiculous fees just to try and leave them? My parents did this and were completely unaware until they started having difficulties.

 

its fraudulent - it must be a good opportunity for someone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't wish to give any false hopes but I understand that their are some lawyers who are taking an interest in matters not dissimilar to these & it may be that assuming a successful outcome their arguments could transfer to those here

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't wish to give any false hopes but I understand that their are some lawyers who are taking an interest in matters not dissimilar to these & it may be that assuming a successful outcome their arguments could transfer to those here

 

Do you have the name of the firm?

Link to post
Share on other sites

LAST CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS

 

The book gets closed tomorrow!

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...