Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
    • Hi everyone, I received a charge certificate with a charge of £165  in April 2022 however I never received a PCN and NTO before that. I responded by requesting original PCN reissued in the hope of getting discounted rate which was refused however I was offered to pay £110. I received an Order of Recovery in May 2023 and submitted a witness statement on time by email to get the original PCN re-issued. I received a Notice of Enforcement in February 2024 I contacted TEC that I had submitted TE9 on time and they advised me to submit a late witness statement and TE7. I did as advised and also attached the original email and witness statement as proof to show that I had submitted my witness statement on time. The council disputed my late witness statement by saying that I likely received the PCN and that I did not submit a valid late witness statement without specifying why it's not valid. The court refused my late witness statement without giving any reasoning behind their decision (so much for the transparency). This is really outrageous as I did attach the proof of submitting the witness statement on time and it seems like the court just decided without looking at the case files. Can someone please advise me what should I do now? Any help is appreciated. I have attached all the documents below.   Documents.pdf
    • Will the real criminals please stand   Biden 🤣GUILTY on all counts    Come September remember Americans don’t like tax dodgers 🤣
    • You of course ignore the fact that Farage actually helped raise £100,000 so that WW11 Veterans could actually attend the celebrations    Meanwhile oh to be in France 🤣  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest at Telford


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

About 18mths ago, I defended a court claim, the judge ordered a stay.

They did not respond to a cpr18.

After that Natwest Telford provided a/c numbers (1 loan/1 current) and a total sum - no split between a/cs

They then closed the loan a/c stating nothing to pay but wanted payment against current a/c stating this was in overdraft.

Next they sent a Termination letter for the current a/c.

I have since received demands from Irwin Mitchell who went away when challenged and now am receiving demands from Shoosmiths who are ignoring the account is in dispute and threating legal action.

 

I have posted sometime ago re: above and thought the problem had gone away.

 

I closed my account with Natwest 10yrs ago with a nil balance and have not applied for a new one.

The account no. they list is different to the closed a/c.

It would appear they have created a current a/c and transferred loan balance thus creating an overdraft.

I have read about this type of accounting on the forums.

 

Can they do this without my permission and how do I respond to Shoosmiths who are now asking for income & expenditure as well my payment proposals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write back stating that you haven't had a bank account with Natwest for 10 years and when you closed it, it was at a ZERO balance also state that it is likely that the debt is entirely made up of excessive charges and it could be that Natwest actually owe you more than you owe them !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an even better idea, Send a subject access request and ask for NatWest archived notes for the account. They will hate me for telling you but then again, they don't want you to know that information do they ;)

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

About 18mths ago, I defended a court claim, the judge ordered a stay.

They did not respond to a cpr18.

After that Natwest Telford provided a/c numbers (1 loan/1 current) and a total sum - no split between a/cs

They then closed the loan a/c stating nothing to pay but wanted payment against current a/c stating this was in overdraft.

Next they sent a Termination letter for the current a/c.

I have since received demands from Irwin Mitchell who went away when challenged and now am receiving demands from Shoosmiths who are ignoring the account is in dispute and threating legal action.

 

I have posted sometime ago re: above and thought the problem had gone away.

 

I closed my account with Natwest 10yrs ago with a nil balance and have not applied for a new one.

The account no. they list is different to the closed a/c.

It would appear they have created a current a/c and transferred loan balance thus creating an overdraft.

I have read about this type of accounting on the forums.

 

Can they do this without my permission and how do I respond to Shoosmiths who are now asking for income & expenditure as well my payment proposals.

 

Telford are experts at changing account types without their customers knowledge.

 

Did you have a loan with Natwest?

 

Take Yourbank's advice and send a SAR.

Edited by paulwlton

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the RBS group are continuing this "secret" accounting and digging themselves such a hole they will never get out of I can see the plug being pulled on this Bank by the government within the next 2 years it will no longer exist ...unless they come clean NOW!!!!

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did have a loan.

Last payment made was 4 yrs ago.

I forgot all about it until the court claim Dec 08.

Until then Natwest had not contacted me.

The poc on the claim showed - no a/c no. type of a/c etc.

After the stay they closed the loan a/c.

 

I have asked for information but not yet sent a SAR.

Does their nil response to cpr18 help in this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I maybe a little confused here with cpr18 and sar.

Do I still need to send sar even though they have had a cpr18.

Is cpr18 now no longer relevant after court ordered a stay.

 

Also what argument can I use as Natwest appear to have created a new current account to hold balance of a loan without my permission or knowledge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now sent a sar to Natwest.

Also sent letter to Shoosmiths to again advise a/c is in dispute and quoting harrassment.

I made a mistake earlier the court claim was Dec 07 & stayed Apr 08.

Over last 12 mths first Irwin Mitchell & lately Shoosmiths have said they are awaiting further info from Natwest as I requested.

A long time just to get some basic information.

As it is a current account do they not have to prove I applied and agreed to terms.

Surely they can't close a loan account and then create a current account out of nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...