Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me  Oh well  
    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
    • A set aside application costs £275 which is more than the judgement so not worth it. Not that they would grant a set aside anyway.  Set asides are granted, for example, to people who moved and didn't get the court papers, so have a genuine reason for not defending.  Forgetting doesn't count. Your only choices are to pay up within 30 days, or defy the court and not pay.  If the latter, we've never seen a PPC enforce judgement for a single ticket, ever, you would get away without paying - but you would have a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Naughtypanther vs HSBC


naughtypanther
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Easy np, don't jump the gun ..... it's not likely to happen with what they've got ..... but if it does you'll get loads of advice on here on how to proceed ....... and probably a lot more notice than 2 weeks..... :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Johnnymitch, its much appreciated. I just am struggling to get a feel for exactly where I stand with it all. There are a lot of grey areas and contradictory facts kicking around.

 

If they were to produce a proper and valid agreement, what really is my stance then?

 

The latest com from MCS gave me 24 hours to make full and final payment before court proceedings etc. It arrived on the 26th, was dated 22nd (1 day after i sent my offer of settlement). I believe they received my letter on the 24th, then sent out the 24 hour final warning with an earlier date on, so as to justify moving to the next stage in their little game.

 

So I fully expect the next letter to be the beginning of their court action against me and am less clear now than ever as to where I stand.

 

By the way, 1:19AM, do you never sleep??:-o:-)

 

np

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that vint :) Thing is, does that stop them taking me to court in the first place? And, more importantly, how does it put my 'account in dispute' stance? If the account is no longer in dispute then I am surely out of line by not making payments?

Hi NP,

 

I have had a look back through your thread, but cannot see exactly what they have sent you. What they need to send you for s78 is:

 

1. A copy of your original agreement. This can be a typed copy of the agreement that you signed, does not have to be a copy with your signature, but it must be so true as to be as the original.

 

2. A copy of the terms and conditions at the time you signed the agreement.

 

3. A copy of the current terms and conditions.

 

4. A signed statement of account, showing the amount outstanding and repayments due. For a running credit account ( credit card ) the latter is difficult to provide, as it can be a moving target, so they usually send a copy of your last statement.

 

If they have not supplied the documents above, then they remain in breach of s78. If they refuse to comply, then a complaint to the OFT is required. This needs to be kept narrow, just dealing with the fact that they have not complied with s78. Resist the temptation to use the opportunity for a good moan about HSBC.

 

If they fail to comply with your SAR, then this is a similar complaint to the ICO. Again, just deal with the facts.

 

While in breach of s78, your account is in dispute. There are many things that they should'nt do in this situation, but they will. Regrettably the Mcguffick case last year, gave them the green light to keep chasing for the debt while in dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Johnnymitch, its much appreciated. I just am struggling to get a feel for exactly where I stand with it all. There are a lot of grey areas and contradictory facts kicking around.

 

If they were to produce a proper and valid agreement, what really is my stance then?

 

The latest com from MCS gave me 24 hours to make full and final payment before court proceedings etc. It arrived on the 26th, was dated 22nd (1 day after i sent my offer of settlement). I believe they received my letter on the 24th, then sent out the 24 hour final warning with an earlier date on, so as to justify moving to the next stage in their little game.

 

So I fully expect the next letter to be the beginning of their court action against me and am less clear now than ever as to where I stand.

 

By the way, 1:19AM, do you never sleep??:-o:-)

 

np

As johnny has said, don't panic. I had one of hose 24 hour letters last November.

 

You will probably get a letter next from DG solicitors, which you need to respond to, then Clear Debt recovery. All of these people are HSBC.

 

In order to carry out any of the threats within these letters, they first have to obtain a County Court Judgement, which is a long way off, if at all.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice? If so, it would be helpful if uou could post it up, minus your personal details but leaving the dates in place. Also, was the amount requested in the DN, just the arrears or the full ballance. Hopefully you will have kept the envelope also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vint,

 

thanks for taking the time to go back through the thread, some of these threads get very cumbersome and hard work to go through and keep up with! I didnt post the exact details up of what they sent at the time as I didnt want this thread to get too bloated, and was convinced that what they sent didnt satisfy the request.

 

Given what you have listed above, it is likely then that they have indeed satisfied my CCA request. I will have to go back through it all and double check.

 

If that is the case, then the account is no longer in dispute, where does that put me?

 

Is there any mileage in the fact that it took them 4 months to do it, and meanwhile they continued to add interest? The total figure is now £1000 more than when it went into dispute!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You type too fast!

 

Yes I received a default notice, I will try and scan it in at work today, and post it up this evening.

 

I paid less attention to the situation for a while, I need to regroup and go through everything i received with a fine tooth comb!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vint,

 

thanks for taking the time to go back through the thread, some of these threads get very cumbersome and hard work to go through and keep up with! I didnt post the exact details up of what they sent at the time as I didnt want this thread to get too bloated, and was convinced that what they sent didnt satisfy the request.

 

Given what you have listed above, it is likely then that they have indeed satisfied my CCA request. I will have to go back through it all and double check.

 

If that is the case, then the account is no longer in dispute, where does that put me?

 

Is there any mileage in the fact that it took them 4 months to do it, and meanwhile they continued to add interest? The total figure is now £1000 more than when it went into dispute!

 

They will add full monthly payments to the account up to the limit and over, especially if you are not making payments that is why the account mounts ups fast. They did it to me.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

They will add full monthly payments to the account up to the limit and over, especially if you are not making payments that is why the account mounts ups fast. They did it to me.

 

They sure try every trick in the book. My point here is, they shouldn't have added these when there was a clear dispute on the account. So the total sum they are demanding is inaccurate, as is the sum on the default. Is this enough to make the default invalid? Could they reissue an accurate one? They already closed the account..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hello again one and all, long time no speak?!! So a further thanks to all those still here that chipped in above years back!

 

Well, for those that remember (unlikely I know) or read back thru the above (dont waste your time, I wouldnt!!) this thread was about me VS HSBC over a credit card that got out of hand. I have spent the past 3 years making reasonable offers of settlement (and being knocked back) and fobbing off HSBCs various collector guises (DG etc), and making small token monthly payments.

 

That all stopped recently when they unleashed wescot on me. I stopped making the token payments to HSBC, and I stopped wescot in their tracks with a letter.

 

Presumably as a reaction to the above, HSBC have called in the overdraft I have with them in a current account. (had this account all the time since this all started, I managed to reduce it over time but its not cleared).

 

Somebody (who isnt a bank) will lend me what I need to clear the overdraft and close the account. However, my concern is that once I have cleared the overdraft (I have 30 days) HSBC will take money out to reclaim part of the credit card debt, only to then remove the OD facility and put me in the doo doo again. Is this something they are likely to do? If so, are there any clever ways of avoiding this? I dont use the account, its just a debt sat there, and I want to clear it, but cant afford to risk them to play silly tricks like this.

 

Thank you for your time,

 

Naughtypanther.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you pay in and clear overdraft then c lose acount there and then, do not think you will have a problem as the credit card is recorded elsewhere, pay in then immediate zero statement then close account there and then. is what I would think about doing, leave no time in between, and make sure you get the assistants name that you see to close on the zero balance immediatly? sure others may comment on this.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Mike, many thanks for that (and all the previous advice years back!).

 

I wouldnt like to rely on timing like that. I suspect that I wont be able to zero balance the account anyway, as there will be a final interest payment to be factored in. I also predict they wont allow me pay it and close it in person, hence giving them more space to pull a fast one. The old credit card account is long closed, I know thyre seperate, but its no coincidence they did this 7 days after me stopping wescot in their tracks. I dont doubt that the account is being monitored now for this exact reason. Any time i paid off a significant amount before I always phoned up and immediately reduced the overdraft, but I suspect now they've given notice on it nobody will be able to change that if I call up.

 

Cheers, Naughtypanther : )

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HI all,

 

so, this matter has evolved!!

 

I paid off the overdraft progressively, paying an amount then calling the bank to reduce the overdraft, until the balance was cleared, overdraft cancelled, and enough credit in there to cover the final interest payments. I went into the branch and, without filling in any forms, got the account closed. Was told it would be a couple of days before I heard anything.

 

So, a week has passed, I called up the bank telebanking and found the account is still active. They also told me my credit card account was there too (havent heard this mentioned in a while),

 

I am wondering, have they re activated my old credit card account so as to prevent me closing the current account? I seem to remember a clause saying that the CC required an active current account?

 

Anybody shed any light on this? To clarify, the CC was 'closed' several years ago, they have been pursuing me for the balance via D&G MCS etc.. Now it seems to be open again, conveniently. Was considering making a ful and final offer on the CC, but that has gone out of the window now they seem to be playing games. Unsure what they hope to achieve?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, cheers, I thought that a condition of the CC was that you had to have a current account with them, I seem to remember not being allowed to close the current account while the credit card was active because of this. Hence I suspect that is why they have reinstated the CC account. how do they stand legally reinstating an account they had already closed years ago, in my name, without my permission?..

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, i was initially told a form needed to be filled out, but a nice lady took me into a room and (allegedly) did it manually there and then. No printed proof in my hand. I have evidence the overdraft was zeroed, and also have proof the account has enough in credit to cover remaining interest payments..

 

I will visit branch tomorrow and see what they have to say. If they play games I am going to look at the option of legal action, as if they have done what I think, I feel I have enough now to form a case against them. Its clear their actions are calculated. I could be jumping the gun I admit, time will tell.

 

Cheers : )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and in answer to the question i asked a couple of weeks ago, in case its of any use to people reading this:

 

I was concerned that as I paid my overdraft that they would try to use the spare balance I was creating to 'set off', I was advised (I believe by National Debtline) that they cannot use one debt (ie space in my overdraft) to set off to pay the other debt (credit card). I took the precaution of paying a chunk off then calling up and reducing the overdraft, then paying more off then reducing again etc etc until account was in credit and overdraft cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For reference, I had to go back into the branch to finalise, but the account was closed without issue and I finally received a statement confirming the same.

 

Now to go and see how much I can borrow(!) to make a full and final payment offer on the credit card this all started with.

 

Thanks to all for all the help now and before.

 

Cheers, Naughtypanther : )

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was concerned that as I paid my overdrafticon that they would try to use the spare balance I was creating to 'set off', I was advised (I believe by National Debtline) that they cannot use one debt (ie space in my overdraft) to set off to pay the other debt (credit card). I took the precaution of paying a chunk off then calling up and reducing the overdraft, then paying more off then reducing again etc etc until account was in credit and overdraft cancelled.

 

 

That mybe why HSBC pay up on PPI (Loan) when loan used to repay credit cards etc?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...