Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFC bank and Restons newbie needs help! ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4855 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No default notice attached to application?

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

No default notice attached to application?

 

No just a photocopy of the front page of the agreement, T&C's and balance sheets which i need to go through carefully..I got the DN by CPR a few months ago and it is invalid..They have not seen fit to include it the bundle..So are these docs they sent the ones they will be relying on in court??

Link to post
Share on other sites

No default notice means their application for summary judgment must fail as they have not complied with s.87 Cca 1974

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then they are stuffed. Check out the dodgy default notice thread

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Everyone..Not been online as I have been ill :sad:

 

The clock is ticking and I have to send my witness statement to Restons and the court by the end of the month..Starting to panic now..I have read most of the threads and have absorbed as much info as I can..I will post a summary of my case (to save going back through the whole thread) if someone could please help me put this together??

 

Thank you in advance

 

One very worried Nana

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent CCA request to OC on 14/10/08..... Ignored my cca request

Sent letter before action (account in dispute) 0n 14/05/09.....

Received letter from OC on 28/05/09 saying Sorry that I am unhappy and they will conduct a thorough investigation.... LOL

Restons start court proceedings on 22/5/09 POC includes collection charge that is in breach of cca rules filled embarresed defence.

Another letter from OC on 2/6/09 saying they are still investigating...

 

CPR.31.14 Restons on the 6/06/09..Receive a CA and DN from them on Default notice is invalid as it does not allow 14 clear days to remedy....Dated 15/11/08 (a saturday)

 

Receive letter from HFC executive complaints department with CA (no DN)attached on 13/7/09 Ten months late of my original CCA request....needless to say but they did not uphold my complaint :eek: and that they have fulfilled their obligations under the CCA 1974 :smile:

 

Sent AQ by local court and attach draft order for directions....

 

Receive WS bundle from Restons (see post 95) They did not include DN in bundle even though they state they have...

 

 

I think that's it..

 

Thank you Nana :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means Nana draft it up and I will take a look later

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness Statement

 

 

1. This statement is made in opposition to the Claimant’s application for summary judgment and by which the Claimant contends I have no real prospect of successfully defending the claim against me.

 

2.On the 14/10/08 I sent a recorded delivery CCA request to HFC.They received the said request on the 16/10/08.My request was ignored.As they did not respond to my request I thought this would be the end of the matter and at this time I was also dealing with a family tragedy.

 

3.A follow up account in dispute letter was sent to HFC on 14/5/09. A response was received from HFC on the 28/05/09 and that they would be conducting an investigation..I still did not receive a response to my lawful CCA request

 

4,On 24th May 2009 court papers were received by me and I noticed that the particulars of claim contained collection charges which I believe to be prohibited under the consumer credit act 1974.

 

5.On the 2/6/09 received another letter from HFC saying that they are still investigating ...I had still not received or had any acknowledgement of my lawful CCA request

 

6.A CPR .31.14 request was sent to Restons on the 6/06/09. I received an alleged credit agreement and a default notice on the 17/6/09

 

7. I contest that the said Default Notice that Restons will rely on is valid as It does not allow the required 14 clear days service to remedy the breach This is considered to be an unlawful rescission of contract.

 

8.I filed my defence on the 25/06/09

 

9.On the 13/7/09 I received another letter from HFC 10 months late of my original CCA request and furthermore refusing to uphold my complaint.

 

10. I receive witness statement and application for summary judgement bundle from Restons. They have failed to attach the Default notice to the bundle to which they have made reference to contrary to s.87 Cca 1974

 

11.Furthermore as this became a formal case in dispute on the 26/10/08 Restons have no cause of action to bring this case in line with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79)

 

12.In the circumstances the court is invited to conclude that there are reasonable grounds to suppose that I will be able to successfully defend the Claimant’s claim at trial and that the Claimant’s application for summary judgment against me should be dismissed.

 

Date:

 

 

Statement of Truth

 

I believe the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true

Edited by nana buzzz
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nana

 

I recognise most of the wording in the above;)

 

It needs a little sharpening but the basis is all there and quite factual.

I will amend it slightly for you this evening

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the same Perdita that i helped with her WS:D

 

Sought it for you this evening

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness Statement

 

 

1. This statement is made in opposition to the Claimant’s application for summary judgment and by which the Claimant contends I have no real prospect of successfully defending the claim against me.

 

2.On the 14/10/08 I sent by recorded delivery, a CCA request to HFC.This was recieved on the 16/10/08.They failed to respond to my request and were therefore in default

3.A further request was sent to HFC on 14/5/09,also advising that i now considered the account in dispute. A response was received from HFC on the 28/05/09 and that they would be conducting an investigation.

4,On 24th May 2009 I recieved a Summons from the CCB without any prior warning or notice from the Claimant.The particulars of claim contained collection charges which I believe to be prohibited under the consumer credit act 1974.

 

5.On the 2/6/09 received another letter from HFC saying that they are still investigating .I have still not received or had any acknowledgement of my Section 78 CCA request

 

6.A CPR .31.14 request was sent to Restons on the 6/06/09. I received an alleged credit agreement and a default notice on the 17/6/09

 

7. I will contend at trial that the Default Notice that Restons will rely on is valid as It does not allow the required 14 clear days service to remedy the breach This is considered to be an unlawful rescission of contract.

 

8.I filed my defence on the 25/06/09

 

9.On the 13/7/09 I received another letter from HFC 10 months late of my original CCA request and furthermore refusing to uphold my complaint.

 

10.On the xxxx I received a Witness Statement and Application for summary judgement bundle from Restons. They have failed to attach the Default notice to the bundle to which they have made reference to contrary to s.87 Cca 1974 and upon which their claim relies upon.

 

11.Furthermore as this became a formal case in dispute on the 26/10/08 Restons have no cause of action to bring this case in line with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79)

 

12.In the circumstances the court is invited to conclude that there are reasonable grounds to suppose that I will be able to successfully defend the Claimant’s claim at trial and that the Claimant’s application for summary judgment against me should be dismissed.

 

Date:

 

 

Statement of Truth

 

I believe the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true

 

 

Check that through Nana and complete the missing date

 

Andy

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...