Announcements

Tweets
- Just now
- Just now
Posts
- Lowell PAPLOC now Claimform - old E-ON £3K+ bill
  
  By dx100uk · Posted 35 minutes ago
  
  Utter Rubbish!! lowell dont write and beg for deals once they start court. as for your attitude, we'll thats nothing new for you.😎 you wont be quizzed, it's not like TV, simply refer to your defence/WS when answering anything the judge may ever ask. well it involves chickens. dx
- Lowell PAPLOC now Claimform - old E-ON £3K+ bill
  
  By autumn53 · Posted 59 minutes ago
  
  Thanks fk, I hope I don't have to face the court. Bless you for the reassurance.
- Lowell PAPLOC now Claimform - old E-ON £3K+ bill
  
  By fkofilee · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Keep an eye out on the post, you may get a discontinuation notice. Im sure however youll be okay. You seem to have enough evidence to dispute the balance.
- Lowell PAPLOC now Claimform - old E-ON £3K+ bill
  
  By autumn53 · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Hi DX There has been no news from the claimant since I posted my WS on 16th April. The court date is on the 31st of May. Looks like they are positive they will win, or they would have offered me a deal. Do you think this is finally going to hearing afterall? I am very nervous as I am not very impressive when put on a spot and my communication skills are very poor face to face. I am okay when asked to put it on paper as you get time to think and write. But not very confident in person. I have a feeling I will lay an egg in the court. Getting my head clouded with a lot of 'what if' thoughts.
- Police pulled me over for having seen me using my phone but I wasn't driving
  
  By Man in the middle · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Can you elaborate a little? Were you parked with the engine off or had you just stopped? Please tell is exactly what you were doing.
Recommended Topics
- 3
  
  Problem with getting deposit back on flat - items missing from inventory
  
  just_jue · Started January 26
- 13
  
  Amazon £1450 laptop returned but norefund
  
  the priest · Started January 17
- 69
  
  Brittania/DCBL ANPR PCN - PAPLOC - claimform - appeal refused - St Johns Road West Birmingham
  
  supernick90 · Started November 9, 2023
- 34
  
  UKPCS Operator Pictures MNPR PCN - no windscreen PCN left - parking in Parent and Child bay without a child - Abbeywood shopping centre, Filton, Bristol BS34 7JL ***Cancelled on Appeal***
  
  mclaresw · Started October 31, 2023
- 55
  
  Excel/ELMS ANPR PCN - Wrong reg - Appeal rejected - Letter of claim now CLAIMFORM - Providence Street Pay and Display Car Park Wakefield, WF1 3BG ***Claim Discontinued***
  
  Mazik33n · Started March 17, 2023
Our picks
- If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
  
  BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers, January 30
  If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
  
  1 reply
  Picked By
  BankFodder, January 30
- Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld
  
  ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers, January 19
  Hello,
  
  On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.
  
  Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom. Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm. They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.
  
  The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.
  
  I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.
  
  Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done.
  
  Many thanks
  
  81 replies
  Picked By
  BankFodder, January 24
- A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report
  
  WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues, August 4, 2021
  Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
  
  161 replies
  Picked By
  WanTToMoveOn, December 24, 2023
- Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available
  
  BankFodder posted a post in a topic, November 30, 2023
  We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.
  
  The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
  This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.
  
  Frankly I don't think that is any accident.
  
  One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.
  
  Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.
  
  We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
  We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
  Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
  This is good ethical practice.
  
  It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.
  
  OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
  Picked By
  BankFodder, November 30, 2023
View All
Recommended Topics
- 34
  
  MET/DCBL ANPR PCN - occupants left site - (346) Southgate Park, Stansted. CM24 IPY
  
  QUAKER6 · Started February 28
- 38
  
  UKPC PCN Pub Carpark PAPLOC Claimform - blue badge displayed - Appeal refused - The Physician Pub B15 3DH
  
  whittymags · Started November 19, 2023
- 46
  
  JCI/Moriarty PAPLOC now claimform - disputed old Talk talk landline/broadband debt
  
  surrey_36 · Started August 24, 2023
- 5
  
  New Estate (2yrs) Road adoption issue
  
  Milo100 · Started November 18, 2023
- 9
  
  G24/BWL - ANPR PCN - overstay - Kingstown Retail Park, Carlisle, CA3 0GW
  
  tutty1 · Started February 27

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…

The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'

Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Traffic Penalty Service Hearing.

By Hobbie
May 21, 2009 in Private Land Parking Enforcement

Followers 1

style="text-align: center;">

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

Please click the "Report " link

at the bottom of one of the posts.

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bernie_the_Bolt

Posted May 22, 2009

- Share
#1

Posted May 22, 2009

Remeber, you have to show that the council have been acting wholly unreasonably, vexatiously or frivolously.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post

Share on other sites

2 months later...

Bernie_the_Bolt

Posted August 4, 2009

- Share
#2

Posted August 4, 2009

Well done! How did it go on costs?

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post

Share on other sites

Bernie_the_Bolt

Posted August 4, 2009

- Share
#3

Posted August 4, 2009

Pursue for entertainment value only.

To expect anything further or of tangible worth will result in disappointment.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post

Share on other sites

Bernie_the_Bolt

Posted August 4, 2009

- Share
#4

Posted August 4, 2009

Hobbie,

I know, I've been there myself.

It isn't going to happen.

All that has happened is that the evidence in this case tends to give greater support to your explanation than the council's.

I don't read that the adjudicator came close at all to calling the CEO a liar.

My experience of PATAS adjudicators (and I have never lost a case - yet!) is that they do not have the higest of regard for the circumstances in which the enforcement officials work (on street and in office). They are poorly paid, poorly motivated and doing an unpopular job. They may be many things but liars and dishonest is a big, big label. For an adjudicator to call an official a liar, they would be accusing them of being a criminal and would need solid evidence, not just an allegation.

My advice is to drop this and move on to a constructive use of energies - such as local campaining against poor signage etc.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post

Share on other sites

Followers 1

Go to topic listing

Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
Have we helped you ...?

Announcements

Tweets

Posts

Recommended Topics

Our picks

Picked By

Picked By

Picked By

Picked By

Recommended Topics

Traffic Penalty Service Hearing.

Recommended Posts

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Link to post

Share on other sites

Recently Browsing 0 Caggers

Navigation Links

Latest

Help and Support

Useful LInks

Reclaim the right Ltd

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service