Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

me & the OH's debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4445 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

when it's supposed to be unlisted(our number has never been listed)

 

those lovely wescot people rang up pretending to be trying to "forward mail"...when the magic word "w****t was mentioned,the phone went dead for some reason ;)

 

I really really hope it's court papers from Northampton......strike out on 2 counts awaiting :D:D

 

LOL

 

I am correct in thinking that once a claim has been struck out,then no other DCA can file for the same "debt"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 511
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

am correct in thinking that once a claim has been struck out,then no other DCA can file for the same "debt"?

 

I'm pretty sure it is, I ended up in court a few years back for a 'repeat' of something that had been previously discarded with by the courts. The reason the other side gave was 'a locum dealt with the initial case and wasn't fully prepped'. They got a 4k wasted costs order for their troubles.

Edited by blipvert
typo
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll have to think very carefully about to whom you have given your number in recent weeks/months - everything from the obvious like catalogues, banks, Opinion panels, CRA's etc to the less obvious like DVLA, Royal Mail, Local Authority etc etc.

 

Perhaps they rang a relative who has been hoodwinked into giving it out???

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

when it's supposed to be unlisted(our number has never been listed)

 

those lovely wescot people rang up pretending to be trying to "forward mail"...when the magic word "w****t was mentioned,the phone went dead for some reason ;)

 

I really really hope it's court papers from Northampton......strike out on 2 counts awaiting :D:D

 

LOL

 

I am correct in thinking that once a claim has been struck out,then no other DCA can file for the same "debt"?

 

You're correct, but it won't stop some of these sharks (apologies to our finny friends) from trying to resurrect it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll have to think very carefully about to whom you have given your number in recent weeks/months - everything from the obvious like catalogues, banks, Opinion panels, CRA's etc to the less obvious like DVLA, Royal Mail, Local Authority etc etc.

 

Perhaps they rang a relative who has been hoodwinked into giving it out???

 

I've mentioned it before but I purchased a pay-as-you-go mobile 2 years ago when I returned to the UK. JBDR managed to get hold of it to chase me for a statute-barred debt I had not incurred. I'm still dangling them on a string before I make mincemeat out of them. A percentage of any damages recovered will be donated to CAG. The rest will be peed up the wall.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapquest keep calling my brother/sister inlaw to say they need to speak to me urgently.

When asked what they want my number for they wont say so my brother / sister in law say in that case they cant have my number..... end of call

 

Notts

As a great man once said " All Men Can Fly But Some Only in One Direction"

 

Notts

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you ring Dir Enqs and ask for, say, Mr Lickthewallfatboy, they'll generally say that the number is ex-directory. This shows that you have a phone at the address, and the DCAs then set about finding the number form various sources.

 

Because of my job I have a genuinely ex-directory number. It doesn't show up on Dir Enq's database, and outgoing calls automatically show as 'blocked'. Only family and a few trusted friends have the number, and we use mobile numbers for everything else.

 

I occasionally get telemarketing calls, usually from US callcentres, which I suspect are random diallers. However, this weekend I had a call which showed up as being Capquest. The caller asked for my other half;

 

Me: 'who's calling?'

CrapQuest: 'Oh, it's the wine club. We want to send Ms X a free ticket for an event, but the letter was returned, so I just wanted to check the address. Can you confirm that Ms X lives there, and when's a good time to speak to her on this number?'

Me: 'I just want to let you know that this call is being recorded. What did you say your name was?'

CrapQ: 'Err, shall I call later.... umm, will X be in later?'

Me: 'I didn't catch your name. Where did you say you calling from?'

CrapQ: (pause) 'The wine club'

Me: 'Are you sure?'

Click.....

 

It happens that the other half is in a wine club, but they know the address. She gave them the number because the couriers wouldn't deliver without a landline number. The wine club say they don't share data, and were concerned that someone had been able to access data. The courier firm say that they don't share data either. I won't name them because I think they are genuine firms who haven't done anything wrong.

 

Now, it also happens that Capquest are pursuing an old debt of SWMBO's for which the OC couldn't produce an agreement. I suspect that some individual is taking money to harvest personal data, which means that somewhere along the line someone else is buying it. Of course it may well be that the fine upstanding people who run Capquest are wholly unaware of such unwholesome shenanigans - but I cannot believe that they are unaware that their staff routinely lie (this is not the first time I've caught them out, but it's usually the old 'we can ring when we like' nonsense), and engage in dubious and non-compliant practices. I'd complain, but previous experience tells me that I may as well as Gerry Adams to walk through Belfast with the Orange Order next July 12 as expect a sensible response.

 

I rang ICO this afternoon, who were predictably concerned (in a patronising way), but not so much that they think they can do anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how do you get a number that directy enquiries have no listing of

 

If it's unlisted, it's obtainable in certain circumstances by some agencies (e.g. police, security services). DCAs seem to use trial and error as much as anything else (as well as dubiously obtained data).

 

If it's just ex-directory, then there's a name at the address, and with a name and confirmation that there's a phone, then it's so much easier to find a matching number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

for those of you who haven't donated yet,or are unaware.....£90 needed to complete the fighting fund for UK26 V Experian.This is important and has implications for all of us!!!

 

thread here......http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/credit-reference-agencies/164122-uk26-experian-limited.html

 

and for those who already know and haven't donated,or who want to again...

 

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=2638492

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...