Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do medication and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell and barclaycard debt was paying them £101PCM but stopped


beerandy1969
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4799 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

beerandy, i was in debt with lowell and i found them really helpful, why are you trying to avoid paying something you obviously know you owe, that isnt right, surely if you have a geniune reason then fair enough but as far as i can see your simply trying to avoid paying what you owe perhaps if people owed up to what they owe and paid things back then debt collectors wouldnt have to threaten to send someone to your house. when i was in debt with them i ignored it and it just made things worse, im just glad i saw SENSE and did the responsable thing

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

beerandy, i was in debt with lowell and i found them really helpful, why are you trying to avoid paying something you obviously know you owe, that isnt right, surely if you have a geniune reason then fair enough but as far as i can see your simply trying to avoid paying what you owe perhaps if people owed up to what they owe and paid things back then debt collectors wouldnt have to threaten to send someone to your house. When i was in debt with them i ignored it and it just made things worse, im just glad i saw sense and did the responsable thing

 

lowells are your friend, lowells are really nice, lowells are really helpful..uhm, right. In my dealings with them they have displayed none of those qualities. In fact, i found them to be little more than sub-human ****, completely ignoring a valid dispute, trying to railroad me into making payment toward an unenforceable debt that they probably purchased for less than 10% of the face value. I didn't quite have the same epiphany that you seem to have had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats because i had debts with Lowells and Capquest and lowells were rather helpful thats all im saying, my experience with lowell was very recent but i did visit this sightl ooking for advice after a friend told me about it. im being totally honest i was wondering if i had to pay my debt in one go, which i cannot afford, but all i saw was conversations from people trying to avoid paying, i think that is morally wrong. Barfly sorry but you are way of your mark im a full time mum. if you dont want to believe my story then thats up to you

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats because i had debts with Lowells and Capquest and lowells were rather helpful thats all im saying, my experience with lowell was very recent but i did visit this sightl ooking for advice after a friend told me about it. im being totally honest i was wondering if i had to pay my debt in one go, which i cannot afford, but all i saw was conversations from people trying to avoid paying, i think that is morally wrong. Barfly sorry but you are way of your mark im a full time mum. if you dont want to believe my story then thats up to you

 

Then precisely why are you here do you have financial problems or do you simply want to express your 'high' morals AND I like the others don't believe your who you claim to be. Your probably connected to 'some' DCA

 

PS I don't normally comment on another's spelling/grammar but in your case I'll make an exception ...........its appalling

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats because i had debts with Lowells and Capquest and lowells were rather helpful thats all im saying, my experience with lowell was very recent but i did visit this sightl ooking for advice after a friend told me about it. im being totally honest i was wondering if i had to pay my debt in one go, which i cannot afford, but all i saw was conversations from people trying to avoid paying, i think that is morally wrong. Barfly sorry but you are way of your mark im a full time mum. if you dont want to believe my story then thats up to you

 

Your experience differs wildly to the point of fantasy from the experience of the vast majority of people, and about 99% of CAG.

 

It is not immoral to accept a gift, and if a creditor is unable to provide a properly executed true copy of the agreement, then what they have given you is in fact a Gift.

 

Given the amount of stress, strife, harrassment, and even suicides caused by these companies, then it is only right to expect them to adhere to every single aspect, intention and letter of the law that governs them and their behaviour. In fact, the only moral option with a company like Capquest is to not pay them, so that it adds up and they go bust.

 

The staff do not have to perform their jobs in such a nasty, rude, vindictive and unlawful manner. Management pressure be damned - I was only obeying Orders is simply not acceptable, at all.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your experience differs wildly to the point of fantasy from the experience of the vast majority of people, and about 99% of CAG.

 

It is not immoral to accept a gift, and if a creditor is unable to provide a properly executed true copy of the agreement, then what they have given you is in fact a Gift.

 

Given the amount of stress, strife, harrassment, and even suicides caused by these companies, then it is only right to expect them to adhere to every single aspect, intention and letter of the law that governs them and their behaviour. In fact, the only moral option with a company like Capquest is to not pay them, so that it adds up and they go bust.

 

The staff do not have to perform their jobs in such a nasty, rude, vindictive and unlawful manner. Management pressure be damned - I was only obeying Orders is simply not acceptable, at all.

 

Apparently Tracy used to work for Cap1 or their DCA:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if Andy Bartle still prints his own money with his head on it? http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5308/is_200801/ai_n21300998/

Last year, in the build up to Christmas, people who hit their KPIs earned 'Lowell banknotes' featuring our COO Andrew Bartle's head, which they could spend in a pre-Christmas auction.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
thats because i had debts with Lowells and Capquest and lowells were rather helpful thats all im saying, my experience with lowell was very recent but i did visit this sightl ooking for advice after a friend told me about it. im being totally honest i was wondering if i had to pay my debt in one go, which i cannot afford, but all i saw was conversations from people trying to avoid paying, i think that is morally wrong. Barfly sorry but you are way of your mark im a full time mum. if you dont want to believe my story then thats up to you

 

Oh, there were more than a few 'tell tales' there ... I never posted before but ... apart from the obvious.

 

but all i saw was conversations from people trying to avoid paying, i think that is morally wrong.

 

Shall we talk about 'morals'? Morals where people are threatened, terrified, humiliated, their humanity stripped away ... and all because someone on the end of a phone has the 'power' to do this and does it with such 'gusto' it seems because it's very easier to do because. Somehow I despair but wonder how much the ones making the calls, what if any sense of morality they possess in their 'moral' make up or 'fibre' has because most human beings would realize saying those things to other people on the phone is most definitely going to have a serious and detrimental affect on them. So, no, not 'morality'. People in debt are very often treated far far worse than serious and hardened, persistent criminals are. In fact, had I reported to the police what one DCA said to me on the phone a while ago I am fairly certain they would have taken an 'interest' as it was definitely a threat not to mention harassment. Did the person on the other end of the phone care? Not one bit, they considered they were on a 'moral high horse' to frighten me to the point I was in a state of panic at the time and told them I don't know how they expected to get away with saying things like to people. I wasn't trying to avoid debt, it was my first encounter with a DCA.

 

So, if anyone 'avoids' things it's the industry which thrives on reducing decent human beings into a very desperate state and despite everyone doing what they should do to reasonably deal with their debts ... where are the morals then? They don't exist. Thing is, those are then life long scars for that person because the fear, the threats don't go away as it's like any other kind of bullying, harassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From this thread...

 

thats because i had debts with Lowells and Capquest and lowells were rather helpful thats all im saying, my experience with lowell was very recent but i did visit this sightl ooking for advice after a friend told me about it. im being totally honest i was wondering if i had to pay my debt in one go, which i cannot afford, but all i saw was conversations from people trying to avoid paying, i think that is morally wrong. Barfly sorry but you are way of your mark im a full time mum. if you dont want to believe my story then thats up to you

 

and from another thread......

 

Re: Lowell has no credit agreement!?

 

if lowell bought this debt from Capital One
link3.gif
then the account will not be coming back to capital one, i know this as i used to work there, the account will be closed and you have got away with paying this back

 

 

 

Have you multiple personalities?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tracey, how do you feel about Lowell trying to enforce a debt for which they have no executed credit agreement, being that it's against OFT guidelines, and possibly Sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act? is that morally wrong of them?

 

Free speech is great. There have been a few DCAs popping up on here in the past few weeks. But what this forum doesn't want is DCAs masquerading as members of the public. Do you really think you were going to win the hearts and minds of the members on here? UnF believable. Do you think we are that stupid? Obviously.

 

Lowells are subhuman ****. They had some clown from the resolutions centre spouting their imbecilic ramblings a few weeks back, and now you've turned up...

 

If you don't work for lowells then except my apologies. but i would urge you to transfer your devotion to something else. maybe religion...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Lowell like to offer solutions to situation then back track I notice. They told me they would provide copy of mobile phone agreement because I was saying I dont remember signing it and I know I wasnt given a copy, so if you are to persue me, prove I owe the money please.

 

They seem to have forgot and are now saying they dont have to provide agreement under cca.

 

Firstly I wasnt mentioning cca as know it doesn't cover mobile contracts, but was a little bemused that they could offer the agreement and then retract.

 

Thing is the call was recorded:madgrin:

 

I know why they havnt provided it, they havnt got one:lol:

 

You see both the store and head office couldn't come up with one some time ago. hhmmmm. Phone calls recorded xx

 

Instead they prefer to get personal re my medical condition, saying they understand it may make it harder for me to pay, so stump up the medical evidence etc, that I have said nope I dont have to or intend to, thats privy to me, my doctor or a court, they need to just take my word for it in putting note on my alleged account. Why would I pay for a non proven debt, do they think my illness makes me gullible?

 

Not where dcas are concerned anyhow.

 

But hang on lowell your word said you would source the contract, doesnt count for much does it, so I dont think I will be passing on my records to you if you cant do quit pro quo as hanibal lecture said. xx

 

If as tracy on here hints they are more amenable, then why not keep their word?

 

I dont like companies who say one thing and dont do it and put pressure on me, I tend to fight back.

 

 

ps. They are dca lost count as it was in dispute prior to leaving the phone company due to issue within first two weeks and them not providing any contract. Maybe they forgot to do one in their keeness to flog an unwanted phone to person on point of collapse in their store, so keen didnt do contract and phone was duff. 'We are in the business of selling phones, not sorting out problems' Store quote.

 

So unless provide contract and deal with initial issue on an account that should not have been sold, well they have bought a duff account. Luckily I remember what they advised me and phone company due to recording call.

 

Maybe lowells know that?

Edited by watchinginvestigation2011
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...