Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
    • Here's a suggested modified version for consideration by the team. (Not sure whether it still gives too much away?)   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you added. Shall we raise the related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding parking periods. Especially with no consideration of section 13 in your own trade association's code of practice and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked, unmanaged over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the above issues and more, with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture a couple of useless ANPR photos. If you insist on continuing this stupid, money grabbing quest, after having all of the above pointed out, we will of course show this letter to the Judge and request “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Signed, "Spot". (Vehicle Keeper's pet Dalmation).
    • Paying DCA's one penny, never mind £50 per month is a mugs game, they have really been milking him as a cash cow   See where received a claim form is underlined in your post, you need to click, on that and read carefully, then answer the questions, then copy and paste into a post on this thread Forget the CAB ,  their advice is sometimes weird. Is it worth defending? Lowell brought these debts for 10 p in the pound , years ago, because they are flawed. Think about it! if it was such an easy win, Capital one could have taken it to court and crushed him.  It could be an invalid agreement, default notice, or many other things. In a nutshell , yes, and we can help you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Harrasment at work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I seen his email account this week and no he has not deleted any..he also has some against our managers due to the fact ' he does not like the way certain procedures are done ' .

He is quite outspoken and offensive about certain people behind their backs which annoys the hell out of me...

 

You have to do this through the official channels. By all means keep the paperwork (preferably at home) but make an appointment to see an HR rep.

 

If he gets wind of this, he may somehow manage to turn the tables on you. Therefore, be discreet but do go and speak to an appropriate individual within your organisation.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from a site that gives a run down on an Employment Tribunal process and procedures.;

 

What Counts as Evidence ?

 

25 July 2008

 

‘Evidence’ means any material that helps prove one side’s case or the other’s - what witnesses say, pieces of paper with things written on them (commonly known as ‘documents’), computer files, records of text messages, photographs, CCTV footage, emails, monogrammed handkerchiefs dropped at the scene of the alleged sexual harassment, bloodstained blunt instruments (admittedly these are rare in employment tribunal proceedings) - etc. etc..

It’s a common mistake to think that what witnesses say doesn’t count as evidence: as in “It’s my word against his, but there’s no evidence.” If he says you did and you say you didn’t, that’s evidence on both sides: the tribunal will just have to decide who it finds more believable.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you obv need some clarification as to your legal standing as regards the emails (referring to them).

In the absence of knowing where you stand on this-it could be counter productive to take any steps until thats established.

I will ask site team collegues for some thoughts.

 

 

Thanks for your assistance on this...

There does not seem to be any disclaimer on emails yet I need to check company policy regarding the reading of other people's email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes agreed.Look forward to the updates.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes agreed.Look forward to the updates.

 

 

Have found a section under Electronic mail which states '

 

do not amend any messages recieved,and excepet where specifically authorised by the other person,do not access any other persons inbox or other email folders nor send other email porporting to be that person '

 

For some of the mails I have access this persons account...

 

Need to check the general policies regarding email overall...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you would also have to do a lot of explaining on how you got to read his emails - sorry, I don't buy the administrative logs. Your admin rights would give you the option to access his mailbox, but you would be the one in the wrong. I have always thought that having admin rights gives you the ability to access data, but not the right. This could be considered gross misconduct and you would be the one in the firing line.

 

You will find this kind of bullying, excluding or ganging up on an individual, happens in every organisation. It isn't right, but it is commonplace. Did you say this person is your supervisor? I think a face to face with this guy is not going to sort it out. You should go directly to your manager and discuss your problem with him. It is his responsibility to try to resolve the matter (and definitely don't mention about reading other people's emails). If your manager does nothing, then I guess you will have to make it official. Make sure you have evidence, but only that which you have accumulated without breaking the rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have found a section under Electronic mail which states '

 

do not amend any messages recieved,and excepet where specifically authorised by the other person,do not access any other persons inbox or other email folders nor send other email porporting to be that person '

 

For some of the mails I have access this persons account...

 

Need to check the general policies regarding email overall...

 

You do not need to disclose that you have these emails and it is not a pre-requisite of any complaint.

 

Your internal audit and/or HR will be able to access these legitimately, if they have reasonable grounds to do so.

 

You need to complain stating that you believe such documentation exists which is undermining your position. It will then be for HR to undertake an investigation.

 

If you don't pursue this matter through the proper channels, then you could be the one on the receiving end and not your colleague.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Umm, if I were the manager I would be asking for an explanation of how he knew the emails existed. Just because somebody leaves themselves logged in, doesn't give you the authority to go routing through their files. I would also expect (and if I managed the systems I'd make sure of it) that there was an audit trail to show if a mailbox was accessed by someone who was not the owner. If your colleague suspects that this is what you have done, he may go looking for evidence and make his own complaint against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the great advice.

I know that showing the emails will be counter productive as I will look in the wrong for accessing these in the first place.

I will go down the route of HR asking them to check for any material.

To be honest I have other areas in my favour such as the lack of involvement and the passing on of information from this colleague when he has been on training or recieved documentation that should be passed down to us all in the team.

I have overheard him talking to another team member about his latest training and how he will show him what is required,which appears to not involve me.

I am tempted to let them get on with it and report any lack of experience down to the fact information is only flowing one way..

 

To answer another question the person is not in a manager role.We are all tech support guys in the same role it is just this person started a few months before us and belives he is more senior and would like a team leader role...lol

Also we have no immediate bosses on site as they are based in another office in the UK.

We basically manage ourselves which is part of the problem i think.HR are on site as is our union.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...