Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital one - final response letter!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5517 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No!

Capital One, this just wont do and spouting reg. 3 of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copy Documents) Regulations 1983 wont help either.

Reg. 7 is quite clear and makes reference to an Executed Agreement!

 

If you cannot supply a true executed copy of the original agreement, section 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, applies.

 

Furthermore, STOP passing the buck to the FOS. You have received a legal request under the CPR's, comply, or shut up.

 

AC

Edited by angry cat
addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, can anybody who knows how delete the links that have the ref no in, please do so. Thankyou, cant figure out how to do it..........:confused:

 

Click on the EDIT button on the bottom right of the posting you want to edit, then just click on the image and hit the delete key, it'll remove the reference from tinypic.

 

You'll then need to re-add a new scanned version without the ref #

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel that you ought to get a red pen, make the speeling and gtrammar errors and send it back!

 

What I received had none of my details on whatsoever and could have been the contents of the bin at the next desk.

 

I have written to Ellie pointing out that as I won't speak and she says she won't reply how on earth are we going to resolve the situation.

 

Oh and her threat monkeys call em from various numbers up to and including 5 times a day.

 

I read s.43 of Ferguson V BG Trading which relates to not having a named person to pin the case of harassment onto and guess whose name popped into mind.

 

 

GK

Link to post
Share on other sites

cerberusalert...Thankyou for explaining, have deleted it now.

So anyway, on account of there being no CCA and Capital 1 giving me their last response on the matter, where do i go from here.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the very same letter from Ellie, posted it up under my CAP 1 thread.

 

Same printed current agreement with T&C's - (also seperate T&C's on another flyer which they said were in relation to the 'agreement') wouldnt supply signature etc due to section 3 as in this instance.

 

Im CPR'ing them tomorrow, I just dont see how they can let a print off of a standard current blank agreement be all they need to enforce an agreement they say I signed 3-4 years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im CPR'ing them tomorrow, I just dont see how they can let a print off of a standard current blank agreement be all they need to enforce an agreement they say I signed 3-4 years ago.

 

They know darn well it isn't all they need to send. But being very, very thick, they have no conception of how more intelligent people think, and therefore suppose that nobody will ever question their idiotic and untruthful statements :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its crazy though that in this day and age and with all the threats they make to ordinary uninformed people like ourselves (well before CAG Anyway!) that they are allowed to get away with the babbling and there is no one regulator who will draw a line in the sand and FORCE them to do things right.

 

Force them to treat people with repect and dignity

 

Force them to keep docs correctly

 

Force them to write the debt off if they do not or have not done this

 

Its called human rights and I think we all deserve the chances that these banks have had, these second, third and fourth chances that so many of them have had.

 

Sorry for the rant, but we arent bad people just because we are in debt. Thank God for CAG and the likes for being the light at the end of the dark tunnel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...