Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just noted that in Section 4 of the ebay powered by packlink T&Cs, there is a link to a list of webpages for each Transport Agency including Evri. When clicking on this, it redirects to Evri's send terms and conditions, which says: Our contract with you When you send a parcel with us, you enter into a contract with Evri. These terms and conditions set out your responsibilities and our service commitments to you, along with some legal bits about our liability and how you will be compensated in the unlikely event that things go wrong. Link to Evri send T&Cs: https://www.evri.com/terms-and-conditions the extract highlighted in bold above is pertinent as in Evri's own T&Cs, by sending a parcel with Evri, the sender and Evri have entered into a contract. Screenshot of the above extract attached. Screenshot_20240524_030834_Chrome.pdf
    • Hi, Evri provided a copy of the Ebay powered by Packlink T&Cs in their WS/Court bundle - this is already uploaded in post #246 yesterday. I copy and pasted the actual wording of clauses 3b and 3c from there into my post #246. see points 3b and 3c in Section 3 (General) through this link to the T&Cs:  https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360004768420-eBay-Delivery-Powered-by-Packlink-Terms-and-Conditions#h_01HFXQJBTB441YZGPB7CQP9KFV Screenshot attached below. I cant answer why its not been picked up before. In my opinion, this is called Ebay powered by packlink T&Cs so it could be intepreted to mean Ebay and Packlink's T&Cs rather than Packlink and the delivery couriers T&Cs. In regards to seeing Evri/Packlink's entire contract in original form, in my WS, Evri has been invited to provide this. They have not provided the contract in their WS/court bundle. Screenshot_20240524_024259_Chrome.pdf
    • yes, and he has since emailed them to say he wants it done with a hearing
    • Do I take it that you had already informed the court that you wanted the case settled on the papers rather than by way of a hearing before you came here and told us?
    • This is a very important find. I don't understand why nobody has picked up on this before. It's a shame that you have only just found it but please will you get a screenshot and also give us a link to the page which contains this and if possible a link to the actual passage. This makes a huge difference because if this is right that the third party actually has a direct contract with the courier company then they can rely on their consumer rights rather than commercial rights. Also as you seem to have pointed out, even if  their commercial contract does exclude third-party rights, the clause that you have found on the eBay site directly contradicts that And this should be pointed out to the judge.  Please will you screenshot the passage. Give us a link and then stand by for a response later on today. We will have to send this additional piece of information to the court and don't worry we will manage to do it before the 4:00 pm deadline. And in any event, you will certainly want to see the entire contract in original form and receive clarification as to when their third-party exclusion close was included in it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit card debt after death


loonpants
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5308 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm after a bit of advice and i'd really really appreciate some help on it. My best mate's dad died this week leaving 4-5k of credit card debt that his mother didn't know about. He had PPI on it but it's a bit of a grey area as to where he stands on claiming on it. Does anyone have any ideas about the legal implications of where the mother stands with absorbing the debts? Is she liable for them? There's a lot of worry happening with it which i'd like to give her a definite answer.

 

I really appreciate any help.

 

 

thanks,

 

 

jon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

His mother is most definitely not reponsible for paying this debt, If he was paying PPI it should be covered in the policy.

 

the Executor of the estate should notify the bank of his death enclosing a copy of the death certificate & that should be an end of the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See also; PPI LEAFLET 2

 

What is payment protection insurance (PPI)?

 

PPI is designed to help you pay your debts if you have an

accident, become ill or unemployed, or if you die. You can

buy PPI with most types of credit, such as hire purchase, a

personal loan, a mortgage, a secured loan (this is a second

mortgage on your home), a credit card or a store card.

PPI will pay part (or all) of your repayments on your loan or

credit agreement if you cannot work because you are ill,

have an accident or lose your job. It can also pay a lump

sum to your credit provider if you die before you have paid

the amount you owe on your credit agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's brilliant. Thank you both so much. You've made a very sad lady a little less sad and worried.

 

Sorry for adding something but i'm finding things out as soon as i find them. He also had a sole bank account with barclays which his salary is paid into. IT's £500 overdrawn at the moment. What would happen with that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank should be notified in order to freeze the account & stop further interest being added. Accounts are normally paid by the executors of the estate after high priority debts have been paid. This could take a year depending on how complex the estate is. Have a look at the following link which will explain things in more detail. What happens to debts when someone dies? : Directgov - Money, tax and benefits

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, i see. So as executor of his estate, she's liable for the overdraft despite it being completely in his name? Will they have to claim for that or is it up to her to instigate it?

 

Another thing that's come to light is that he wasn't the best at paying on time with the credit cards, What i would love is that she gets as much money to secure her future as i can offer her, would she still be able to claim back any credit card charges from them even though the debt has been paid by the ppi?

 

I really do appreciate this help.Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh, i see. So as executor of his estate, she's liable for the overdraft despite it being completely in his name?

The Executor only pays from the Estate not their own money.

 

She will still be able to reclaim unfair charges on behalf of the Estate, but it would be better if that was done after the balance is settled by the PPI. This can be done within six years so there's plenty of time without having to rush things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

sorry to resurrect this thread but i need some more advice if possible. All the debts have been sorted apart from one loan that doesn't have ppi on it. They're now kicking off sending threatening letters to the widow demanding payment on the estate that simply isn't there. I've no idea where to take this, can anyone help? There's no money in the estate at all, what can they demand from her??

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to resurrect this thread but i need some more advice if possible. All the debts have been sorted apart from one loan that doesn't have ppi on it. They're now kicking off sending threatening letters to the widow demanding payment on the estate that simply isn't there. I've no idea where to take this, can anyone help? There's no money in the estate at all, what can they demand from her??

 

and this is who?

 

debts die with the debtor esp if they are civil debts

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello & wave

 

2u7t9g1.gif

 

Make a complaint to your local trading standards & the OFT with regards to their harassment and threats, they are in clear breach of OFT guidelines & CPUT;

 

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/DebtCollectionComplaintForm.DOC

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

 

[email protected]

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Debt collection practices

 

tel: 020 7211 5823

Debt collection guidance - Final guidance on unfair business practices - oft664

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi,

 

I am in a similar situation. My father died and had 2 credit cards. One with Monument who immediately wrote off the debt and one with Egg who are hounding me for the money. My father has a property and hopefully when sold there will be some money left over to pay funeral expenses etc. He had no life insurance or other assets and my mother died 6 months prior to my father. When my mother died her banl loan and credit card with HSBC were immediately written off and HSBC were very helpful and understanding. Am I responsible for the debt to Egg and why did Monument write off the debt to them?

 

Whats the latest in your situation?

 

Any ideas ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, i forgot to update!

 

Everything was finally sorted out once threats were issued to them with regards to the OFT and trading standards. All the debts were cleared. You're definitely not responsible for your father's debt. All the above advice was completely correct and they didn't have a leg to stand on.

 

Thanks to everyone!

 

What exactly are EGG saying? That you're responsible for the debt now? Or that they want money out of the estate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great news, glad you got it sorted.

Egg say that I need to sell the property and pay them, but other credit card just wrote it off no qibbles. Was planning to move into the property myself, but if I have to pay egg then I will have to sell it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...